Influence of crown-to-abutment height ratio on fracture resistance of full-coverage anterior restorations.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Amirmohammad Babaeianfar, Hamid Neshandar Asli, Yasamin Babaee Hemmati, Mehran Falahchai
{"title":"Influence of crown-to-abutment height ratio on fracture resistance of full-coverage anterior restorations.","authors":"Amirmohammad Babaeianfar, Hamid Neshandar Asli, Yasamin Babaee Hemmati, Mehran Falahchai","doi":"10.1111/jopr.14091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the effect of crown-to-abutment (C/A) height ratio on fracture resistance (FR) of full-coverage anterior restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this in vitro study, 66 human maxillary central incisors were assigned to six groups according to their abutment height (n = 11): control (sound tooth), V4 (prepared vital tooth with 4 mm height), V4e (4 mm abutment with 4 mm height gain through elective endodontic treatment, fiber post, and core build-up), V6 (prepared vital tooth with 6 mm height), V6e (6 mm abutment with 2 mm height gain through elective endodontic treatment, fiber post, and core build-up), and V8 (prepared vital tooth with 8 mm height). Zirconia crowns with 10 mm height were fabricated for all teeth and cemented. After thermomechanical loading, the FR and fracture mode were assessed. Data were analyzed by independent t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with James-Howell test for pairwise comparisons, and Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the experimental groups, V8 showed a significantly lower FR than other groups (p < 0.05). The FR of V6 was significantly lower than V4 (p < 0.001). V4 had a significantly higher FR than V4e (p < 0.001). However, the difference in FR was not significant between V6 and V6e (p = 0.408). V6e had the highest frequency of unfavorable fractures, and V4 had the highest frequency of favorable fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the same restorative space, the minimum tested abutment height resulted in the highest FR in full-coverage anterior restorations, eliminating the need for invasive procedures to increase the abutment height.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of crown-to-abutment (C/A) height ratio on fracture resistance (FR) of full-coverage anterior restorations.

Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, 66 human maxillary central incisors were assigned to six groups according to their abutment height (n = 11): control (sound tooth), V4 (prepared vital tooth with 4 mm height), V4e (4 mm abutment with 4 mm height gain through elective endodontic treatment, fiber post, and core build-up), V6 (prepared vital tooth with 6 mm height), V6e (6 mm abutment with 2 mm height gain through elective endodontic treatment, fiber post, and core build-up), and V8 (prepared vital tooth with 8 mm height). Zirconia crowns with 10 mm height were fabricated for all teeth and cemented. After thermomechanical loading, the FR and fracture mode were assessed. Data were analyzed by independent t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with James-Howell test for pairwise comparisons, and Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05).

Results: Among the experimental groups, V8 showed a significantly lower FR than other groups (p < 0.05). The FR of V6 was significantly lower than V4 (p < 0.001). V4 had a significantly higher FR than V4e (p < 0.001). However, the difference in FR was not significant between V6 and V6e (p = 0.408). V6e had the highest frequency of unfavorable fractures, and V4 had the highest frequency of favorable fractures.

Conclusion: In the same restorative space, the minimum tested abutment height resulted in the highest FR in full-coverage anterior restorations, eliminating the need for invasive procedures to increase the abutment height.

冠基比对全覆盖前牙修复体抗骨折能力的影响。
目的:探讨冠基比(C/A)对前牙全覆盖修复体抗骨折性的影响。材料与方法:66颗人上颌中切牙根据基牙高度分为6组(n = 11):控制组(健全牙)、V4组(预备的重要牙高4mm)、V4e组(预备的重要牙高4mm,通过选择性牙髓治疗、纤维桩、堆核增加)、V6组(预备的重要牙高6mm)、V6e组(预备的重要牙高6mm,通过选择性牙髓治疗、纤维桩、堆核增加)、V8组(预备的重要牙高8mm)。所有牙齿制作10mm高的氧化锆冠并粘接。热力学加载后,评估FR和断裂模式。数据分析采用独立t检验,两两比较采用James-Howell检验,Fisher精确检验(α = 0.05)。结果:实验组中,V8组FR明显低于其他组(p < 0.05)。V6的FR显著低于V4 (p < 0.001)。V4组FR明显高于V4e组(p < 0.001)。然而,V6和V6e的FR差异无统计学意义(p = 0.408)。V6e出现不良骨折的频率最高,V4出现有利骨折的频率最高。结论:在相同的修复空间内,测试的最小基台高度可使全覆盖前牙修复的FR最高,无需进行侵入性手术来增加基台高度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信