Functional goals and outcomes of rehabilitation within palliative care: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Matthew Maddocks, Lucy Fettes, Naomi Takemura, Joanne Bayly, Helena Talbot-Rice, Karen Turner, Rebecca Tiberini, Richard Harding, Fliss E M Murtagh, Richard J Siegert, Irene J Higginson, Stephen A Ashford, Lynne Turner-Stokes
{"title":"Functional goals and outcomes of rehabilitation within palliative care: a multicentre prospective cohort study.","authors":"Matthew Maddocks, Lucy Fettes, Naomi Takemura, Joanne Bayly, Helena Talbot-Rice, Karen Turner, Rebecca Tiberini, Richard Harding, Fliss E M Murtagh, Richard J Siegert, Irene J Higginson, Stephen A Ashford, Lynne Turner-Stokes","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01816-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rehabilitation is an integral component of palliative care. An understanding of functional goals can help tailor interventions and support the evaluation of services. This study examined the nature and timescale of functional goals in palliative care, attainment of goals following personalised rehabilitation, responsiveness relative to health-related quality of life across, and factors associated with goal achievement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, observational cohort study of adults with advanced progressive illness from 10 UK hospices referred for rehabilitation assessment. Urgency of care needs and functional status were assessed using the palliative Phase of Illness (stable, unstable, deteriorating) and Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS, ≥ 60,60 - 50, ≤ 40) respectively. Health-related quality of life was assessed using EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5 L) utility score. Functional goals were set collaboratively with patients using SMART goal statements, mapped onto the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) was used to evaluate achievement against an anticipated outcome using a T-score. Ordinal logistic regression was sued to identify factors associated with goal achievement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>364 patients (54% female, mean (SD) age 68 (14) years, 71% cancer, 71% stable Phase, median AKPS 60) took part. They set a median (range) of 2 (1-4) goals; 645 in total. Goals had a median (range) timeframe of 28 (1-196) days and spanned 13/30 ICF domains; most frequently mobility, general tasks and demands, mental functions, community, social and civic life, and self-care. The majority focused on activity (51%) and participation (20%). Following personalised rehabilitation, GAS T-scores improved overall (mean (SD) change 8.9 (13.4)) and for each subgroup by Phase and AKPS (all p < 0.01). EQ-5D scores improved overall, but not for those with a deteriorating Phase or AKPS ≤ 40. Living alone or receiving multiple interventions increased the likelihood of goal achievement, whereas being wheelchair or bedbound, receiving a generic exercise intervention, or having goals rated as very difficult reduced it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Functional goals in palliative care typically focus on optimising activity and participation in the short term. Progress towards personalised goals can be achieved through personalised rehabilitation, including among people with deteriorating health or largely confined to bed. Goal Attainment Scaling can help direct and evaluate rehabilitation interventions in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01816-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation is an integral component of palliative care. An understanding of functional goals can help tailor interventions and support the evaluation of services. This study examined the nature and timescale of functional goals in palliative care, attainment of goals following personalised rehabilitation, responsiveness relative to health-related quality of life across, and factors associated with goal achievement.

Methods: Prospective, observational cohort study of adults with advanced progressive illness from 10 UK hospices referred for rehabilitation assessment. Urgency of care needs and functional status were assessed using the palliative Phase of Illness (stable, unstable, deteriorating) and Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS, ≥ 60,60 - 50, ≤ 40) respectively. Health-related quality of life was assessed using EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5 L) utility score. Functional goals were set collaboratively with patients using SMART goal statements, mapped onto the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) was used to evaluate achievement against an anticipated outcome using a T-score. Ordinal logistic regression was sued to identify factors associated with goal achievement.

Results: 364 patients (54% female, mean (SD) age 68 (14) years, 71% cancer, 71% stable Phase, median AKPS 60) took part. They set a median (range) of 2 (1-4) goals; 645 in total. Goals had a median (range) timeframe of 28 (1-196) days and spanned 13/30 ICF domains; most frequently mobility, general tasks and demands, mental functions, community, social and civic life, and self-care. The majority focused on activity (51%) and participation (20%). Following personalised rehabilitation, GAS T-scores improved overall (mean (SD) change 8.9 (13.4)) and for each subgroup by Phase and AKPS (all p < 0.01). EQ-5D scores improved overall, but not for those with a deteriorating Phase or AKPS ≤ 40. Living alone or receiving multiple interventions increased the likelihood of goal achievement, whereas being wheelchair or bedbound, receiving a generic exercise intervention, or having goals rated as very difficult reduced it.

Conclusions: Functional goals in palliative care typically focus on optimising activity and participation in the short term. Progress towards personalised goals can be achieved through personalised rehabilitation, including among people with deteriorating health or largely confined to bed. Goal Attainment Scaling can help direct and evaluate rehabilitation interventions in this setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

姑息治疗中康复的功能目标和结果:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
背景:康复是姑息治疗的一个组成部分。对功能目标的理解有助于调整干预措施并支持对服务的评估。本研究考察了姑息治疗中功能目标的性质和时间尺度、个性化康复后目标的实现、与健康相关的生活质量相关的反应性以及与目标实现相关的因素。方法:前瞻性、观察性队列研究,对来自英国10家临终关怀医院的晚期进行性疾病患者进行康复评估。分别采用姑息期疾病(稳定、不稳定、恶化)和澳大利亚修正Karnofsky性能状态(AKPS,≥60、60 - 50、≤40)评估护理需求的紧迫性和功能状态。采用EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (eq - 5d - 5l)效用评分评估健康相关生活质量。使用SMART目标声明与患者合作制定功能目标,并将其映射到世卫组织国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)。目标实现量表(GAS)使用t分数来评估成就与预期结果的关系。运用序数逻辑回归找出与目标达成相关的因素。结果:364例患者(54%为女性,平均(SD)年龄68(14)岁,71%为癌症,71%为稳定期,中位AKPS为60)参与研究。他们设定了2(1-4)个目标的中位数(范围);总共645个。目标的中位(范围)时间框架为28(1-196)天,跨越13/30个ICF域;最常见的是活动能力,一般任务和需求,心理功能,社区,社会和公民生活,以及自我保健。大多数人关注活动(51%)和参与(20%)。个性化康复后,GAS t评分总体改善(平均(SD)变化8.9(13.4)),每个亚组的分期和AKPS均有所改善(所有p结论:姑息治疗的功能目标通常侧重于优化短期内的活动和参与。实现个性化目标的进展可以通过个性化康复来实现,包括对健康状况恶化或主要卧床的人进行个性化康复。目标实现量表可以帮助指导和评估这种情况下的康复干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信