Application of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in femoral head necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yangbin Cao, Peiyuan Tang, Han Tan, Wenbo Ma, Hua Chai, Bin Lin, Ying Zhu, Wenfeng Xiao, Ting Wen, Jun Zhang, Yusheng Li, Shuguang Liu
{"title":"Application of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in femoral head necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yangbin Cao, Peiyuan Tang, Han Tan, Wenbo Ma, Hua Chai, Bin Lin, Ying Zhu, Wenfeng Xiao, Ting Wen, Jun Zhang, Yusheng Li, Shuguang Liu","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2024-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search for term systems related to ONFH and HBOT in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases. The risk ratio (RR) was used as the effective index for dichotomous variables while mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the effective index for continuous variables, with a two-sided P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. I2 statistic and Q test were used to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included, involving 568 participants. Pre-post meta-analyses to show the visual analog scale after HBOT (MD = -2.94, 95% CI: -4.27, -1.60, P < 0.0001), short form 12 physical component summary scale (SF12 PCS) (MD = 17.28, 95% CI: 8.26, 26.31, P = 0.0002), short form 12 mental component summary scale (SF12 MCS) (MD = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.56, 5.95, P < 0.00001), Harris hip score (HHS) (MD = 26.91, 95% CI: 0.35, 53.46, P = 0.05), modified Harris hip score (mHHS) (MD = 44.31, 95% CI: 13.75, 74.87, P = 0.004) were significantly different from those before treatment. The results of SF12 PCS (MD = -0.39, 95% CI: -7.85, 7.06, P = 0.92) and SF12 MCS (MD = 0.76, 95% CI: -7.02, 8.52, P = 0.85), patients' improved events (RR = 1.83, 95% CI: 0.37, 9.09, P = 0.46) showed no significant difference between the HBO and non-HBO groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicate that HBOT cannot be regarded as an effective measure for the treatment of early-stage necrosis of the femoral head and more large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed for further verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"10 7","pages":"466-474"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2024-0167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

Methods: Search for term systems related to ONFH and HBOT in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases. The risk ratio (RR) was used as the effective index for dichotomous variables while mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the effective index for continuous variables, with a two-sided P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. I2 statistic and Q test were used to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity of the included studies.

Results: Ten studies were included, involving 568 participants. Pre-post meta-analyses to show the visual analog scale after HBOT (MD = -2.94, 95% CI: -4.27, -1.60, P < 0.0001), short form 12 physical component summary scale (SF12 PCS) (MD = 17.28, 95% CI: 8.26, 26.31, P = 0.0002), short form 12 mental component summary scale (SF12 MCS) (MD = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.56, 5.95, P < 0.00001), Harris hip score (HHS) (MD = 26.91, 95% CI: 0.35, 53.46, P = 0.05), modified Harris hip score (mHHS) (MD = 44.31, 95% CI: 13.75, 74.87, P = 0.004) were significantly different from those before treatment. The results of SF12 PCS (MD = -0.39, 95% CI: -7.85, 7.06, P = 0.92) and SF12 MCS (MD = 0.76, 95% CI: -7.02, 8.52, P = 0.85), patients' improved events (RR = 1.83, 95% CI: 0.37, 9.09, P = 0.46) showed no significant difference between the HBO and non-HBO groups.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that HBOT cannot be regarded as an effective measure for the treatment of early-stage necrosis of the femoral head and more large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed for further verification.

高压氧治疗股骨头坏死的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价高压氧治疗股骨头骨坏死(ONFH)的疗效。方法:在PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase和Web of Science数据库中检索与ONFH和HBOT相关的术语系统。以风险比(RR)作为二分类变量的有效指标,以均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)作为连续变量的有效指标,双侧P < 0.05认为有统计学意义。采用I2统计量和Q检验评价纳入研究的统计异质性。结果:纳入10项研究,568名受试者。张后荟萃分析显示HBOT后视觉模拟量表(MD = -2.94, 95% CI: -4.27, -1.60, P < 0.0001),简式12物理组件总结规模(SF12 pc) (MD = 17.28, 95% CI: 8.26, 26.31, P = 0.0002),简式12心理组件总结规模(SF12 MCS) (MD = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.56, 5.95, P < 0.00001), Harris髋关节评分(HHS) (MD = 26.91, 95% CI: 0.35, 53.46, P = 0.05),修改Harris髋关节评分(mHHS) (MD = 44.31, 95%置信区间CI:13.75, 74.87, P = 0.004),与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义。结果显示,SF12 PCS (MD = -0.39, 95% CI: -7.85, 7.06, P = 0.92)和SF12 MCS (MD = 0.76, 95% CI: -7.02, 8.52, P = 0.85)患者的改善事件(RR = 1.83, 95% CI: 0.37, 9.09, P = 0.46)在高压氧组和非高压氧组之间无显著差异。结论:本研究结果提示HBOT不能作为治疗股骨头早期坏死的有效措施,需要更多的大规模随机对照试验进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信