Association between frailty, use of advanced therapies, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day readmission in elderly patients admitted with acute pulmonary embolism.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mohammad Zghouzi, Ahmad Jabri, Sant Kumar, Anand Maligireddy, Roshan Bista, Timir K Paul, Mohamed Farhan Nasser, Hady Lichaa, Herbert D Aronow, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Bryan Kelly, Gillian Grafton, Rana Awdish, Mir Babar Basir, Khaldoon Alaswad, Mohammad Alqarqaz, Gerald Koenig, Vikas Aggarwal
{"title":"Association between frailty, use of advanced therapies, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day readmission in elderly patients admitted with acute pulmonary embolism.","authors":"Mohammad Zghouzi, Ahmad Jabri, Sant Kumar, Anand Maligireddy, Roshan Bista, Timir K Paul, Mohamed Farhan Nasser, Hady Lichaa, Herbert D Aronow, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Bryan Kelly, Gillian Grafton, Rana Awdish, Mir Babar Basir, Khaldoon Alaswad, Mohammad Alqarqaz, Gerald Koenig, Vikas Aggarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty increases vulnerability to morbidity and mortality among elderly individuals, particularly those with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Elderly patients, especially frail ones, remain underrepresented in studies evaluating advanced PE therapies, creating uncertainty regarding therapy utilization and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Readmission Database (NRD), elderly patients (>75 years) admitted with acute PE between 2016 and 2020 were identified via ICD-10 codes. Patients were stratified based on the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS >5 defined frailty) and clinical presentation (high-risk vs. non-high-risk features). Advanced therapies analyzed included systemic thrombolysis (ST), catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), catheter-directed embolectomy (CDE), and surgical embolectomy (SE). Logistic regression adjusted for demographics and comorbidities compared in-hospital outcomes between frail and non-frail patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 233,091 patients were included; 53.0 % without and 79.9 % with high-risk features were frail. Advanced therapy utilization did not differ significantly between frail and non-frail patients within high-risk PE. Frail patients experienced higher in-hospital mortality in both non-high-risk (7.2 % vs. 1.8 %, adjusted OR [aOR]: 2.3, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-2.6, p < 0.001) and high-risk groups (36.2 % vs. 30.2 %, aOR: 1.2, 95 % CI: 1.0-1.3, p = 0.02). Frailty was associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 3.9, 95 % CI: 3.3-4.7, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (aOR: 2.1, 95 % CI: 1.9-2.3, p < 0.001), and hematuria (aOR: 10.8, 95 % CI: 9.4-12.4, p < 0.001). Frail patients had higher 30-day readmissions compared to non-frail patients (aOR: 1.2, 95 % CI: 1.1-1.2, p < 0.001), longer lengths of stay (6.1 vs. 3.6 days, p < 0.001), and higher total charges ($61,100 vs. $36,370, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty significantly increases mortality and adverse events in elderly patients hospitalized with acute PE, particularly in non-high-risk individuals. These findings highlight the necessity of frailty assessment to optimize management decisions and guide therapeutic strategies in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.06.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty increases vulnerability to morbidity and mortality among elderly individuals, particularly those with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Elderly patients, especially frail ones, remain underrepresented in studies evaluating advanced PE therapies, creating uncertainty regarding therapy utilization and outcomes.

Methods: Using the National Readmission Database (NRD), elderly patients (>75 years) admitted with acute PE between 2016 and 2020 were identified via ICD-10 codes. Patients were stratified based on the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS >5 defined frailty) and clinical presentation (high-risk vs. non-high-risk features). Advanced therapies analyzed included systemic thrombolysis (ST), catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), catheter-directed embolectomy (CDE), and surgical embolectomy (SE). Logistic regression adjusted for demographics and comorbidities compared in-hospital outcomes between frail and non-frail patients.

Results: A total of 233,091 patients were included; 53.0 % without and 79.9 % with high-risk features were frail. Advanced therapy utilization did not differ significantly between frail and non-frail patients within high-risk PE. Frail patients experienced higher in-hospital mortality in both non-high-risk (7.2 % vs. 1.8 %, adjusted OR [aOR]: 2.3, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-2.6, p < 0.001) and high-risk groups (36.2 % vs. 30.2 %, aOR: 1.2, 95 % CI: 1.0-1.3, p = 0.02). Frailty was associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 3.9, 95 % CI: 3.3-4.7, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (aOR: 2.1, 95 % CI: 1.9-2.3, p < 0.001), and hematuria (aOR: 10.8, 95 % CI: 9.4-12.4, p < 0.001). Frail patients had higher 30-day readmissions compared to non-frail patients (aOR: 1.2, 95 % CI: 1.1-1.2, p < 0.001), longer lengths of stay (6.1 vs. 3.6 days, p < 0.001), and higher total charges ($61,100 vs. $36,370, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Frailty significantly increases mortality and adverse events in elderly patients hospitalized with acute PE, particularly in non-high-risk individuals. These findings highlight the necessity of frailty assessment to optimize management decisions and guide therapeutic strategies in this vulnerable population.

老年急性肺栓塞患者虚弱、先进治疗方法的使用、住院结果和30天再入院之间的关系
背景:虚弱增加了老年人发病率和死亡率的易感性,特别是急性肺栓塞(PE)患者。老年患者,尤其是体弱多病的患者,在评估高级PE治疗的研究中仍然代表性不足,这给治疗的使用和结果带来了不确定性。方法:使用国家再入院数据库(NRD),通过ICD-10代码识别2016年至2020年间入院的急性PE老年患者(bb0 ~ 75岁)。根据医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS bbbb5定义的虚弱)和临床表现(高危与非高危特征)对患者进行分层。分析的先进疗法包括全身溶栓(ST)、导管定向溶栓(CDT)、导管定向栓塞切除术(CDE)和外科栓塞切除术(SE)。Logistic回归调整了人口统计学和合并症,比较了体弱和非体弱患者的住院结果。结果:共纳入233,091例患者;53.0%无高危特征,79.9%有高危特征;在高危PE患者中,体弱多病和非体弱多病患者的先进治疗应用无显著差异。体弱患者在非高危人群中均有较高的住院死亡率(7.2% vs. 1.8%,调整OR [aOR]: 2.3, 95%可信区间[CI]: 2.2-2.6, p)。结论:体弱显著增加急性PE住院老年患者的死亡率和不良事件,尤其是在非高危人群中。这些发现强调了虚弱评估对优化管理决策和指导治疗策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信