Enhancing provider adoption of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) through implementation science: insights from two international workshops.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Angela C Wolff, Kate Absolom, Sara Ahmed, Susan J Bartlett, Maria Jose Santana, Angela M Stover, Elizabeth J Austin
{"title":"Enhancing provider adoption of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) through implementation science: insights from two international workshops.","authors":"Angela C Wolff, Kate Absolom, Sara Ahmed, Susan J Bartlett, Maria Jose Santana, Angela M Stover, Elizabeth J Austin","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00911-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in practice is increasing, successful implementation is contingent on engaging healthcare providers (HCPs). Using Implementation Science (IS), we present the content of two workshops hosted at the International Society for Quality-of-Life annual conferences for individuals seeking to implement PROMs collection and use in their settings. Our goals were to provide workshop participants with knowledge, tools, and resources to prepare HCPs for PROM adoption and to demonstrate tailored strategies to meet context-specific needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interdisciplinary team with diverse expertise in PROMs implementation delivered two workshops guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behavior (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Using dotmocracy, participants were asked to consider, for their local context, the factors most important for changing HCPs' behaviors to adopt PROMs in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The workshops incorporated IS theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) to identify barriers faced by HCPs, support behavior change, and apply tailored theory-informed implementation strategies to prepare HCPs for PROM integration and evaluate adoption success. The factors rated the most important by workshop participants (n = 53) were woven into the discussions to illustrate the most common barriers encountered by HCPs adopting PROMs. Presenters drew on real-world practice and research experiences to identify promising implementation strategies, including education, training, behavioral modeling, persuasion, environmental restructuring, enablement, and audit and feedback to increase the capability, opportunity, and motivation of HCPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the increasing evidence base supporting the role of PROMs in patient-centered care, it is imperative to understand the mechanisms and best practices for increasing provider adoption of PROMs. This work offers a roadmap for understanding determinants more important to HCPs and systematically selecting theory-informed implementation strategies that may increase the likelihood of HCP adoption of PROMs. Offering tailored HCP training/education programs and implementation strategies can prepare HCPs for timely and effective PROM implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00911-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in practice is increasing, successful implementation is contingent on engaging healthcare providers (HCPs). Using Implementation Science (IS), we present the content of two workshops hosted at the International Society for Quality-of-Life annual conferences for individuals seeking to implement PROMs collection and use in their settings. Our goals were to provide workshop participants with knowledge, tools, and resources to prepare HCPs for PROM adoption and to demonstrate tailored strategies to meet context-specific needs.

Methods: An interdisciplinary team with diverse expertise in PROMs implementation delivered two workshops guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behavior (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Using dotmocracy, participants were asked to consider, for their local context, the factors most important for changing HCPs' behaviors to adopt PROMs in daily practice.

Results: The workshops incorporated IS theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) to identify barriers faced by HCPs, support behavior change, and apply tailored theory-informed implementation strategies to prepare HCPs for PROM integration and evaluate adoption success. The factors rated the most important by workshop participants (n = 53) were woven into the discussions to illustrate the most common barriers encountered by HCPs adopting PROMs. Presenters drew on real-world practice and research experiences to identify promising implementation strategies, including education, training, behavioral modeling, persuasion, environmental restructuring, enablement, and audit and feedback to increase the capability, opportunity, and motivation of HCPs.

Conclusions: Given the increasing evidence base supporting the role of PROMs in patient-centered care, it is imperative to understand the mechanisms and best practices for increasing provider adoption of PROMs. This work offers a roadmap for understanding determinants more important to HCPs and systematically selecting theory-informed implementation strategies that may increase the likelihood of HCP adoption of PROMs. Offering tailored HCP training/education programs and implementation strategies can prepare HCPs for timely and effective PROM implementation.

通过实施科学加强提供者采用患者报告的结果措施(PROMs):来自两个国际研讨会的见解。
背景:尽管在实践中越来越多地使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),但成功的实施取决于医疗保健提供者(HCPs)的参与。利用实施科学(IS),我们介绍了在国际生活质量协会年会上为寻求在其环境中实施prom收集和使用的个人举办的两个研讨会的内容。我们的目标是为研讨会参与者提供知识、工具和资源,使hcp为PROM的采用做好准备,并展示量身定制的策略,以满足特定环境的需求。方法:在能力、机会、动机-行为(COM-B)模型和理论领域框架(TDF)的指导下,一个具有多种专业知识的跨学科团队举办了两次研讨会。使用网络民主,参与者被要求考虑,在他们当地的背景下,改变hcp的行为,在日常实践中采用prom最重要的因素。结果:研讨会结合了IS理论、模型和框架(tmf)来识别hcp面临的障碍,支持行为改变,并应用定制的理论知情实施策略,为hcp整合PROM做好准备,并评估采用成功。研讨会参与者(n = 53)认为最重要的因素被纳入讨论,以说明HCPs采用prom时遇到的最常见障碍。演讲者利用现实世界的实践和研究经验来确定有希望的实施策略,包括教育、培训、行为建模、说服、环境重组、实施、审计和反馈,以增加hcp的能力、机会和动机。结论:鉴于越来越多的证据支持PROMs在以患者为中心的护理中的作用,了解PROMs的机制和最佳实践是必要的。这项工作为理解对HCP更重要的决定因素提供了路线图,并系统地选择了有理论依据的实施策略,这可能会增加HCP采用prom的可能性。提供量身定制的HCP培训/教育计划和实施策略可以使HCP为及时有效地实施PROM做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信