Cross-sectoral follow-up after hospital discharge from a geriatric ward: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (G-UD).

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08922-7
Alexander Viktor Eriksen, Sanne Have Beck, Dorthe Nielsen, Katja Thomsen, Josefine Oredson Krone, Karen Andersen-Ranberg
{"title":"Cross-sectoral follow-up after hospital discharge from a geriatric ward: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (G-UD).","authors":"Alexander Viktor Eriksen, Sanne Have Beck, Dorthe Nielsen, Katja Thomsen, Josefine Oredson Krone, Karen Andersen-Ranberg","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08922-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advancing age is associated with multimorbidity, polypharmacy and functional impairments and older adults with these characteristics are at increased risk of acute admission and readmission. Readmission rate of geriatric patients is high, especially within the first week after discharge. Previous studies on transitional care interventions have mainly showed positive effects, but no study has assessed the effect of a home visit done jointly by a geriatric nurse and a community nurse, with a systematic review of health functions, objective clinical assessment and bedside blood analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre two-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial using permuted block randomisation will be conducted. Randomisation occurs at discharge. The intervention consists of a follow-up visit within 2-5 days by a geriatric nurse and a community nurse. A systematic review of bodily functions is carried out, and solutions of identified problems are discussed taking into consideration the patient's view. If the patient shows signs of worsened health since discharge vital status and bedside blood analyses using point-of-care-testing (POCT) can be carried out at the discretion of the geriatric nurse. As required the patients will be conferred with a senior geriatrician by video consultation. The patient's primary care physician is invited to participate online. The control group will receive usual discharge. Endpoints are readmission, mortality rates and financial costs. User perspectives include focus group interviews with patients, geriatric nurses, community nurses, geriatricians and primary care physicians.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The intervention is multifactorial to match the needs of complex geriatric patients. We will thus not be able to discern, which part of the intervention has the greatest impact, but the intervention will encompass most of the clinical situation that may potentially lead to acute readmission. If a positive effect is found the intervention may be scaled up to include all departments discharging vulnerable geriatric patients, as well as implemented in guidelines for the discharge of older medical patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05139823, Registered 1 December 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08922-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advancing age is associated with multimorbidity, polypharmacy and functional impairments and older adults with these characteristics are at increased risk of acute admission and readmission. Readmission rate of geriatric patients is high, especially within the first week after discharge. Previous studies on transitional care interventions have mainly showed positive effects, but no study has assessed the effect of a home visit done jointly by a geriatric nurse and a community nurse, with a systematic review of health functions, objective clinical assessment and bedside blood analyses.

Methods: A single-centre two-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial using permuted block randomisation will be conducted. Randomisation occurs at discharge. The intervention consists of a follow-up visit within 2-5 days by a geriatric nurse and a community nurse. A systematic review of bodily functions is carried out, and solutions of identified problems are discussed taking into consideration the patient's view. If the patient shows signs of worsened health since discharge vital status and bedside blood analyses using point-of-care-testing (POCT) can be carried out at the discretion of the geriatric nurse. As required the patients will be conferred with a senior geriatrician by video consultation. The patient's primary care physician is invited to participate online. The control group will receive usual discharge. Endpoints are readmission, mortality rates and financial costs. User perspectives include focus group interviews with patients, geriatric nurses, community nurses, geriatricians and primary care physicians.

Discussion: The intervention is multifactorial to match the needs of complex geriatric patients. We will thus not be able to discern, which part of the intervention has the greatest impact, but the intervention will encompass most of the clinical situation that may potentially lead to acute readmission. If a positive effect is found the intervention may be scaled up to include all departments discharging vulnerable geriatric patients, as well as implemented in guidelines for the discharge of older medical patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05139823, Registered 1 December 2021.

老年病房出院后跨部门随访:一项随机对照试验(G-UD)的研究方案
背景:年龄增长与多病、多药和功能障碍有关,具有这些特征的老年人急性入院和再入院的风险增加。老年患者再入院率高,出院后1周内再入院率最高。以往关于过渡性护理干预的研究主要显示了积极的效果,但没有研究评估由老年护士和社区护士共同进行的家访的效果,包括系统的健康功能回顾、客观的临床评估和床边血液分析。方法:采用排列区随机化进行单中心、双臂平行组随机对照试验。随机化发生在出院时。干预措施包括由一名老年护士和一名社区护士在2-5天内进行随访。对身体功能进行系统的回顾,并考虑到患者的观点,讨论确定问题的解决方案。如果患者出院后出现健康恶化的迹象,可由老年护士酌情使用即时检测(POCT)进行生命状况和床边血液分析。根据需要,患者将通过视频会诊与资深老年病专家进行交流。邀请患者的初级保健医生在线参与。对照组按常规出院。终点是再入院率、死亡率和财务成本。用户视角包括对患者、老年护士、社区护士、老年医生和初级保健医生进行焦点小组访谈。讨论:干预是多因素的,以满足复杂老年患者的需求。因此,我们将无法辨别干预的哪一部分影响最大,但干预将包括大多数可能导致急性再入院的临床情况。如果发现积极效果,可扩大干预范围,使其包括所有易受伤害的老年病人出院的部门,并在老年病人出院的指导方针中加以实施。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT05139823,注册日期:2021年12月1日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信