Facilitators and barriers for return to work among patients with post-COVID-19 condition: a qualitative interview study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aleksandra Sulg, Aki Vuokko, Kirsi Kvarnström, Mikko Varonen, Antti Malmivaara, Jari Arokoski, Helena Liira
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers for return to work among patients with post-COVID-19 condition: a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Aleksandra Sulg, Aki Vuokko, Kirsi Kvarnström, Mikko Varonen, Antti Malmivaara, Jari Arokoski, Helena Liira","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2525434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post COVID-19 condition (PCC) can have long-lasting adverse effects, including impacts on work ability. This study explores the facilitators and barriers in the return-to-work (RTW) process.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Conducted in spring 2023 at the Outpatient Clinic for Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, this qualitative study involved phone interviews with 32 patients with PCC, of whom 28 were included in the analysis, while four interviews served as pilots. A research doctor conducted semi-structured interviews covering work ability, RTW actions and rehabilitation experiences. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several factors influenced work ability and the RTW process. For individual-related factors, self-guided rehabilitation, stress management, a positive attitude and high motivation supported RTW. Severe symptoms like fatigue and cognitive impairment, along with negative thoughts about them and experience of stress, hindered progress. Work-related factors included supportive employers and flexible work arrangements, while negative attitudes, skepticism about PCC and inflexible workloads were barriers. Health care-related and social factors showed that adequate emotional support and comprehensive healthcare services facilitated rehabilitation, whereas poor support, limited services and insufficient PCC understanding were obstacles. Regarding social insurance, partial sick leave supported RTW, but unmet criteria for benefits posed a barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCC's multifactorial nature, complicated by work ability challenges, requires a holistic approach considering individual, social and work-related factors. Effective support involves understanding patients' experiences and fostering collaboration among healthcare providers, employers and the social security system to facilitate RTW, especially in prolonged cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2525434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post COVID-19 condition (PCC) can have long-lasting adverse effects, including impacts on work ability. This study explores the facilitators and barriers in the return-to-work (RTW) process.

Design and methods: Conducted in spring 2023 at the Outpatient Clinic for Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, this qualitative study involved phone interviews with 32 patients with PCC, of whom 28 were included in the analysis, while four interviews served as pilots. A research doctor conducted semi-structured interviews covering work ability, RTW actions and rehabilitation experiences. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an inductive approach.

Results: Several factors influenced work ability and the RTW process. For individual-related factors, self-guided rehabilitation, stress management, a positive attitude and high motivation supported RTW. Severe symptoms like fatigue and cognitive impairment, along with negative thoughts about them and experience of stress, hindered progress. Work-related factors included supportive employers and flexible work arrangements, while negative attitudes, skepticism about PCC and inflexible workloads were barriers. Health care-related and social factors showed that adequate emotional support and comprehensive healthcare services facilitated rehabilitation, whereas poor support, limited services and insufficient PCC understanding were obstacles. Regarding social insurance, partial sick leave supported RTW, but unmet criteria for benefits posed a barrier.

Conclusion: PCC's multifactorial nature, complicated by work ability challenges, requires a holistic approach considering individual, social and work-related factors. Effective support involves understanding patients' experiences and fostering collaboration among healthcare providers, employers and the social security system to facilitate RTW, especially in prolonged cases.

covid -19后患者重返工作岗位的促进因素和障碍:一项定性访谈研究
背景:COVID-19后状态(PCC)可产生长期不良影响,包括对工作能力的影响。本研究探讨复工过程中的促进因素与阻碍因素。设计与方法:本定性研究于2023年春季在COVID-19长期影响门诊进行,对32名PCC患者进行了电话访谈,其中28人被纳入分析,另有4人作为试点。一名研究医生进行了半结构化访谈,内容包括工作能力、RTW行动和康复经历。访谈被记录下来,逐字抄写,并使用归纳方法进行分析。结果:几个因素影响工作能力和RTW过程。在个体相关因素方面,自我引导康复、压力管理、积极态度和高动机支持RTW。严重的症状,如疲劳和认知障碍,以及对它们的消极想法和压力的经历,阻碍了进步。与工作相关的因素包括雇主的支持和灵活的工作安排,而消极态度、对PCC的怀疑和不灵活的工作量是障碍。卫生保健相关因素和社会因素表明,充分的情感支持和全面的卫生保健服务有助于康复,而支持不足、服务有限和对PCC理解不足则是障碍。关于社会保险,部分病假支持复职,但未达到福利标准构成障碍。结论:PCC的多因素性,与工作能力挑战有关,需要综合考虑个人、社会和工作因素。有效的支持包括了解患者的经历,并促进医疗保健提供者、雇主和社会保障系统之间的合作,以促进复诊,特别是长期病例的复诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信