Comparison of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Subdiaphragmatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S524399
Hao-Yun Liu, Chih-Yang Hsiao, Rey-Heng Hu, Po-Chin Liang, Chih-Horng Wu
{"title":"Comparison of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Subdiaphragmatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection.","authors":"Hao-Yun Liu, Chih-Yang Hsiao, Rey-Heng Hu, Po-Chin Liang, Chih-Horng Wu","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S524399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although surgical resection and liver transplantation are considered curative, recurrence is common, especially after hepatectomy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers a minimally invasive alternative for treating recurrent HCC. However, its efficacy is influenced by tumor location and imaging guidance. This study aims to compare the outcomes of CT-guided and US-guided RFA in patients with single small recurrent HCCs located in the subdiaphragmatic region after hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, we included patients who received RFA for recurrent HCC following curative hepatectomy between 2008 and 2020. Patients were categorized into CT-guided or US-guided RFA groups. RFA was performed by experienced interventional radiologists, and follow-up imaging was conducted every 3-6 months to assess recurrence. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary outcome was overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 59 and 32 patients with subdiaphragmatic lesions underwent CT-guided- and US-guided RFA, respectively, for single recurrent HCC. The CT-guided group showed larger tumor size, lower recurrence rates, and significantly better RFS in Kaplan-Meier analysis compared to the US-guided group (49.5 months vs 35.7 months, p value= 0.042). Multivariate analysis confirmed a superior RFS hazard ratio (HR=0.551) for CT-guided RFA, although the overall survival showed no significant difference. Major complications were absent in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-guided RFA provides improved RFS for subdiaphragmatic recurrent HCC, highlighting its potential as a preferred technique for challenging anatomical locations. Further multicenter prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings and assess the long-term survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"1231-1240"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S524399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although surgical resection and liver transplantation are considered curative, recurrence is common, especially after hepatectomy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers a minimally invasive alternative for treating recurrent HCC. However, its efficacy is influenced by tumor location and imaging guidance. This study aims to compare the outcomes of CT-guided and US-guided RFA in patients with single small recurrent HCCs located in the subdiaphragmatic region after hepatectomy.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we included patients who received RFA for recurrent HCC following curative hepatectomy between 2008 and 2020. Patients were categorized into CT-guided or US-guided RFA groups. RFA was performed by experienced interventional radiologists, and follow-up imaging was conducted every 3-6 months to assess recurrence. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary outcome was overall survival (OS).

Results: In this study, 59 and 32 patients with subdiaphragmatic lesions underwent CT-guided- and US-guided RFA, respectively, for single recurrent HCC. The CT-guided group showed larger tumor size, lower recurrence rates, and significantly better RFS in Kaplan-Meier analysis compared to the US-guided group (49.5 months vs 35.7 months, p value= 0.042). Multivariate analysis confirmed a superior RFS hazard ratio (HR=0.551) for CT-guided RFA, although the overall survival showed no significant difference. Major complications were absent in both groups.

Conclusion: CT-guided RFA provides improved RFS for subdiaphragmatic recurrent HCC, highlighting its potential as a preferred technique for challenging anatomical locations. Further multicenter prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings and assess the long-term survival outcomes.

ct与超声引导下射频消融治疗膈下肝细胞癌术后复发的比较。
目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一。虽然手术切除和肝移植被认为可以治愈,但复发是常见的,尤其是肝切除术后。射频消融(RFA)是治疗复发性肝癌的一种微创方法。但其疗效受肿瘤定位和影像学引导的影响。本研究旨在比较ct引导下和us引导下RFA治疗膈下区单发小肝癌的疗效。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们纳入了2008年至2020年期间接受射频消融术治疗复发性HCC的患者。患者分为ct引导组和us引导组。RFA由经验丰富的介入放射科医生进行,每3-6个月随访一次影像学检查复发情况。主要终点是无复发生存期(RFS),次要终点是总生存期(OS)。结果:在本研究中,59例和32例膈下病变患者分别接受了ct引导下和us引导下的RFA治疗单发复发HCC。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,ct引导组肿瘤体积更大,复发率更低,RFS明显优于us引导组(49.5个月vs 35.7个月,p值= 0.042)。多因素分析证实,ct引导下的RFA具有更高的RFS风险比(HR=0.551),但总生存率无显著差异。两组患者均无重大并发症。结论:ct引导下RFA为膈下复发性HCC提供了更好的RFS,突出了其作为具有挑战性解剖位置的首选技术的潜力。需要进一步的多中心前瞻性研究来验证这些发现并评估长期生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信