Multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging-derived parameters for differentiating high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma from other epithelial ovarian cancers.
{"title":"Multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging-derived parameters for differentiating high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma from other epithelial ovarian cancers.","authors":"Tsukasa Saida, Miki Yoshida, Taishi Amano, Masashi Shindo, Reo Nemoto, Takeo Iizuka, Ayumi Shikama, Toyomi Satoh, Takahito Nakajima","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01813-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common ovarian cancer subtype, and its differentiation from others is crucial for treatment. This study aimed to evaluate parameters derived from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and metrics based on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), for differentiating HGSC from other ovarian cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent preoperative MRI including multi-b-value DWI. From the solid tissues of the tumours, diffusion parameters were derived from the multi-b-value DWI data using different models: ADC using a mono-exponential model; the true diffusion coefficient (Di), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) using the IVIM model; and kurtosis (K) using the DKI model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 56 patients with different histological cancer subtypes (mean age, 60 years; range, 24-87 years). The mean values of HGSC compared to the other cancers showed lower ADC (0.58 ± 0.21 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 0.76 ± 0.18 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, p < 0.001), lower Di (0.37 ± 0.09 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. 0.42 ± 0.15 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, p = 0.201), and lower f (35.79 ± 11.48% vs. 48.01 ± 17.21%, p = 0.003), with a higher K (1.06 ± 0.25 vs. 0.84 ± 0.20, p = 0.341). Among these parameters, ADC showed the highest diagnostic performance in differentiating HGSC from others, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79. These trends were particularly pronounced between HGSC and clear cell carcinoma, with significant differences in all parameters except D*. Additionally, K <sub>Mean</sub> was the only parameter that showed a significant difference between HGSC and endometrioid carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multi-b-value DWI-derived parameters, particularly ADC, may aid in the non-invasive preoperative differentiation of HGSC from other ovarian cancers. Multi-b-value DWI-derived parameters, especially ADC, demonstrated utility in differentiating high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) from other ovarian cancers, highlighting their potential in non-invasive preoperative tumor characterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1678-1687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01813-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common ovarian cancer subtype, and its differentiation from others is crucial for treatment. This study aimed to evaluate parameters derived from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and metrics based on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), for differentiating HGSC from other ovarian cancers.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent preoperative MRI including multi-b-value DWI. From the solid tissues of the tumours, diffusion parameters were derived from the multi-b-value DWI data using different models: ADC using a mono-exponential model; the true diffusion coefficient (Di), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) using the IVIM model; and kurtosis (K) using the DKI model.
Results: This study included 56 patients with different histological cancer subtypes (mean age, 60 years; range, 24-87 years). The mean values of HGSC compared to the other cancers showed lower ADC (0.58 ± 0.21 × 10⁻3 mm2/s vs. 0.76 ± 0.18 × 10⁻3 mm2/s, p < 0.001), lower Di (0.37 ± 0.09 × 10⁻3 mm2/s vs. 0.42 ± 0.15 × 10⁻3 mm2/s, p = 0.201), and lower f (35.79 ± 11.48% vs. 48.01 ± 17.21%, p = 0.003), with a higher K (1.06 ± 0.25 vs. 0.84 ± 0.20, p = 0.341). Among these parameters, ADC showed the highest diagnostic performance in differentiating HGSC from others, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79. These trends were particularly pronounced between HGSC and clear cell carcinoma, with significant differences in all parameters except D*. Additionally, K Mean was the only parameter that showed a significant difference between HGSC and endometrioid carcinoma.
Conclusion: Multi-b-value DWI-derived parameters, particularly ADC, may aid in the non-invasive preoperative differentiation of HGSC from other ovarian cancers. Multi-b-value DWI-derived parameters, especially ADC, demonstrated utility in differentiating high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) from other ovarian cancers, highlighting their potential in non-invasive preoperative tumor characterization.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.