Recanalization of basilar artery occlusion during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy.

IF 8.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Grace Adwane, Maarten G Lansberg, Simon Liebart, Frederique Charbonneau, Maya A Schwartz, Jeremy J Heit, Michael Mlynash, Denis Sablot, Anne Wacongne, Jean-Philippe Desilles, Vincent Costalat, Michael Obadia, Carole Henry, Eric Manchon, Caroline Arquizan, Gregory W Albers, Adrien Ter Schiphorst, Pierre Seners
{"title":"Recanalization of basilar artery occlusion during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy.","authors":"Grace Adwane, Maarten G Lansberg, Simon Liebart, Frederique Charbonneau, Maya A Schwartz, Jeremy J Heit, Michael Mlynash, Denis Sablot, Anne Wacongne, Jean-Philippe Desilles, Vincent Costalat, Michael Obadia, Carole Henry, Eric Manchon, Caroline Arquizan, Gregory W Albers, Adrien Ter Schiphorst, Pierre Seners","doi":"10.1177/17474930251357739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with acute ischemic stroke and a large vessel occlusion admitted to non-endovascular capable centers frequently require inter-hospital transfer to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for thrombectomy. Data regarding arterial recanalization of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) during transfer are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed prospectively collected data of acute stroke patients with BAO transferred for consideration of thrombectomy to three CSCs (Rothschild Hospital, France; Montpellier Hospital, France; Stanford Hospital, USA) between 2016 and 2024, with arterial imaging at the referring hospital and on CSC arrival. Inter-hospital recanalization was assessed by comparison of the baseline and post-transfer arterial imaging and was defined as 2a-3 on the modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Independent predictors of inter-hospital recanalization were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 228 patients were included: median age 71 years, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 14, transfer time of 3.5 h, and 39% of patients received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before transfer. The primary reason for withholding IVT was late presentation. Inter-hospital BAO recanalization occurred in 15% of patients. Variables independently associated with inter-hospital BAO recanalization were IVT use (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 24.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.9-85.5, <i>P</i> < 0.01), distal BAO site (aOR = 2.9, 1.0-8.5, <i>P</i> = 0.05), lack of diabetes (aOR = 11.4, 1.4-93.2, <i>P</i> = 0.02), and non-atheromatous etiology (aOR = 6.6, 1.4-31.4, <i>P</i> = 0.02). BAO recanalization rates ranged from 1% in non-IVT-treated patients with proximal BAO to 45% in IVT-treated patients with distal BAO. Inter-hospital recanalization was associated with an increased odds of good functional outcome (odds ratio (OR) for 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) = 0-2 = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.2-8.8, <i>P</i> = 0.02, adjusted for age, pre-stroke mRS, baseline NIHSS, Posterior Circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS), IVT use, and onset-to-imaging time).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BAO recanalization during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy occurred in 15% of patients and was associated with a favorable 3-month outcome. IVT use in the referring center was the primary modifiable factor associated with recanalization, yet its use remains low. Expanding IVT indications in primary stroke centers and developing new therapies that increase recanalization may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251357739"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251357739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with acute ischemic stroke and a large vessel occlusion admitted to non-endovascular capable centers frequently require inter-hospital transfer to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for thrombectomy. Data regarding arterial recanalization of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) during transfer are lacking.

Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data of acute stroke patients with BAO transferred for consideration of thrombectomy to three CSCs (Rothschild Hospital, France; Montpellier Hospital, France; Stanford Hospital, USA) between 2016 and 2024, with arterial imaging at the referring hospital and on CSC arrival. Inter-hospital recanalization was assessed by comparison of the baseline and post-transfer arterial imaging and was defined as 2a-3 on the modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Independent predictors of inter-hospital recanalization were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: Overall, 228 patients were included: median age 71 years, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 14, transfer time of 3.5 h, and 39% of patients received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before transfer. The primary reason for withholding IVT was late presentation. Inter-hospital BAO recanalization occurred in 15% of patients. Variables independently associated with inter-hospital BAO recanalization were IVT use (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 24.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.9-85.5, P < 0.01), distal BAO site (aOR = 2.9, 1.0-8.5, P = 0.05), lack of diabetes (aOR = 11.4, 1.4-93.2, P = 0.02), and non-atheromatous etiology (aOR = 6.6, 1.4-31.4, P = 0.02). BAO recanalization rates ranged from 1% in non-IVT-treated patients with proximal BAO to 45% in IVT-treated patients with distal BAO. Inter-hospital recanalization was associated with an increased odds of good functional outcome (odds ratio (OR) for 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) = 0-2 = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.2-8.8, P = 0.02, adjusted for age, pre-stroke mRS, baseline NIHSS, Posterior Circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS), IVT use, and onset-to-imaging time).

Conclusions: BAO recanalization during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy occurred in 15% of patients and was associated with a favorable 3-month outcome. IVT use in the referring center was the primary modifiable factor associated with recanalization, yet its use remains low. Expanding IVT indications in primary stroke centers and developing new therapies that increase recanalization may improve outcomes.

院间转移取栓过程中基底动脉闭塞的再通。
背景:急性缺血性卒中和大血管闭塞的患者在非血管内功能中心住院时,经常需要转到综合卒中中心(CSC)进行血栓切除术。关于基底动脉闭塞(BAO)患者在移植过程中动脉再通的数据缺乏。方法:对考虑取栓的急性脑卒中BAO患者转至3家CSCs的前瞻性资料进行分析(Rothschild Hospital, France;蒙彼利埃医院,法国;斯坦福医院,美国)在2016年至2024年期间,在转诊医院和CSC到达时进行动脉成像。通过比较基线和转移后动脉成像来评估院间再通,mTICI评分定义为2a-3。采用多变量logistic回归分析评估医院间再通的独立预测因素。结果:共纳入228例患者:中位年龄71岁,NIHSS 14,转移时间3.5小时,39%的患者在转移前接受静脉溶栓治疗。暂扣IVT的主要原因是迟交。医院间BAO再通发生率为15%。与院间BAO再通独立相关的变量是IVT使用(aOR=24.3, 95%CI 6.9-85.5, p)。结论:15%的患者在院间转移取栓期间BAO再通,并与良好的3个月预后相关。在转诊中心使用IVT是与再通相关的主要可改变因素,但其使用率仍然很低。扩大IVT在初级卒中中心的适应症和开发增加再通的新疗法可能会改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信