Three-year clinical outcomes of the Misago stent via transradial intervention for aorto-iliac arterial disease.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yasuyuki Tsuchida, Naoki Hayakawa, Hiromi Miwa, Shinya Ichihara, Shunsuke Maruta, Shunichi Kushida
{"title":"Three-year clinical outcomes of the Misago stent via transradial intervention for aorto-iliac arterial disease.","authors":"Yasuyuki Tsuchida, Naoki Hayakawa, Hiromi Miwa, Shinya Ichihara, Shunsuke Maruta, Shunichi Kushida","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02562-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transradial intervention (TRI) is increasingly used for EVT in these lesions, and the Misago bare nitinol stent (BNS) is compatible with this approach. However, clinical outcomes of the Misago stent via TRI have not yet been reported. Therefore, we evaluated the 3-year clinical outcomes of the Misago stent via TRI. We demonstrated the retrospective, single-center observational study included 348 aorto-iliac arteries in 255 patients treated between October 2019 and May 2023, with Rutherford classifications ranging from categories 1 to 6. The patients were divided into groups: those treated with other stent types via TFI (n = 231) and those treated with Misago stents (n = 117). Additionally, outcomes of patients treated with Misago stents via TRI (n = 72) were compared to those treated with Misago stents via TFI (n = 45). The primary endpoint was 3-year primary patency, and the secondary endpoints were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), all-cause mortality, major amputation, cerebral infarction, and procedure-associated complications during hospitalization. The 3-year primary patency rate was not significantly different between the Misago stent and other stents (93.2% versus 91.8%, respectively; P = 0.78). Similarly, the 3-year primary patency rate of the Misago stent via TRI was comparable to that of the Misago stent via TFI (91.7% versus 95.6%, respectively; P = 0.44). The competing risks model with multivariate analysis showed that the Misago stent and TRI were not associated with 3-year TLR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI],0.24-0.64; P = 0.71 and HR, 1.94; 95% CI,0.47-8.07; P = 0.36, respectively). Dialysis and TSAC II C-D were independent predictors of 3-year TLR (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.50-7.18; P = 0.003 and HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.28-5.69; P = 0.009, respectively). The Misago stent via TRI for aorto-iliac arterial disease demonstrated acceptable 3-year clinical outcomes. Dialysis and TSAC II C-D were identified as predictors of 3-year TLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02562-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transradial intervention (TRI) is increasingly used for EVT in these lesions, and the Misago bare nitinol stent (BNS) is compatible with this approach. However, clinical outcomes of the Misago stent via TRI have not yet been reported. Therefore, we evaluated the 3-year clinical outcomes of the Misago stent via TRI. We demonstrated the retrospective, single-center observational study included 348 aorto-iliac arteries in 255 patients treated between October 2019 and May 2023, with Rutherford classifications ranging from categories 1 to 6. The patients were divided into groups: those treated with other stent types via TFI (n = 231) and those treated with Misago stents (n = 117). Additionally, outcomes of patients treated with Misago stents via TRI (n = 72) were compared to those treated with Misago stents via TFI (n = 45). The primary endpoint was 3-year primary patency, and the secondary endpoints were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), all-cause mortality, major amputation, cerebral infarction, and procedure-associated complications during hospitalization. The 3-year primary patency rate was not significantly different between the Misago stent and other stents (93.2% versus 91.8%, respectively; P = 0.78). Similarly, the 3-year primary patency rate of the Misago stent via TRI was comparable to that of the Misago stent via TFI (91.7% versus 95.6%, respectively; P = 0.44). The competing risks model with multivariate analysis showed that the Misago stent and TRI were not associated with 3-year TLR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI],0.24-0.64; P = 0.71 and HR, 1.94; 95% CI,0.47-8.07; P = 0.36, respectively). Dialysis and TSAC II C-D were independent predictors of 3-year TLR (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.50-7.18; P = 0.003 and HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.28-5.69; P = 0.009, respectively). The Misago stent via TRI for aorto-iliac arterial disease demonstrated acceptable 3-year clinical outcomes. Dialysis and TSAC II C-D were identified as predictors of 3-year TLR.

Misago支架经桡动脉介入治疗主动脉-髂动脉疾病的三年临床结果
经桡动脉介入治疗(TRI)越来越多地用于这些病变的EVT, Misago裸镍钛合金支架(BNS)与该方法兼容。然而,Misago支架经TRI的临床结果尚未报道。因此,我们通过TRI评估Misago支架3年的临床结果。我们展示了回顾性、单中心观察性研究,包括2019年10月至2023年5月期间治疗的255名患者的348条主动脉-髂动脉,卢瑟福分类从1到6类。患者被分为两组:经TFI治疗的其他支架类型组(n = 231)和Misago支架组(n = 117)。此外,通过TRI治疗Misago支架的患者(n = 72)与通过TFI治疗Misago支架的患者(n = 45)的结果进行了比较。主要终点是3年原发性通畅,次要终点是临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术(CD-TLR)、全因死亡率、主要截肢、脑梗死和住院期间手术相关并发症。Misago支架与其他支架的3年一期通畅率无显著差异(分别为93.2%和91.8%;p = 0.78)。同样,经TRI的Misago支架与经TFI的Misago支架的3年初级通畅率相当(分别为91.7%和95.6%;p = 0.44)。多因素分析的竞争风险模型显示Misago支架和TRI与3年TLR无关(风险比[HR], 0.80;95%置信区间[CI],0.24-0.64;P = 0.71, HR为1.94;95%置信区间,0.47 - -8.07;P = 0.36)。透析和TSAC II C-D是3年TLR的独立预测因子(HR, 3.28;95% ci, 1.50-7.18;P = 0.003, HR为2.70;95% ci, 1.28-5.69;P = 0.009)。Misago支架经TRI治疗主动脉-髂动脉疾病显示出可接受的3年临床结果。透析和TSAC II C-D被确定为3年TLR的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信