{"title":"Health impact of alcohol regulatory interventions: A systematic review of policies in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Amila Suranga Malawige, Leopold Ndemnge Aminde, Gayathri Udeshika Weeratunga, Kumudu Weerakoon, J Lennert Veerman","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alcohol consumption poses significant public health challenges globally, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experiencing a substantial burden from alcohol-related harm. However, the effectiveness of interventions to control alcohol consumption in LMICs remains understudied. This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of alcohol regulatory interventions adopted in LMICs. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science was conducted on 10th August 2024. The search strategy included terms related to regulatory interventions and their impact on alcohol consumption, health, and other related outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the NIH, EPOC checklist, ISPOR-SDMD checklist and CASP quality assessment tools, and a narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the review findings. Of the 169 full texts screened, 62 studies were included in this review. Most of the studies were conducted in upper middle-income countries (n=48, 77%), seven were from lower middle-income countries, one from a low-income country and others were combinations of the above. Sixty percent of the included studies were of good quality. In terms of WHO alcohol policy domains, 18 studies focused on restriction of physical availability, 11 on pricing, one on marketing, 21 on drink driving, and 11 on a combination of all policy domains. Alcohol consumption-related outcomes were reported in 26 studies while health and other outcomes were reported in 25 and 14 studies respectively. Restrictions on physical availability of alcohol were largely effective across all outcomes while the pricing policy domain consistently demonstrated effectiveness in reducing alcohol consumption. The scarce evidence on marketing policy interventions was inconclusive; interventions targeting drink driving showed beneficial effects. The available evidence suggests that alcohol control policies are largely effective in LMICs. Further regular and statutory enforcement of these interventions is likely to improve their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Alcohol consumption poses significant public health challenges globally, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experiencing a substantial burden from alcohol-related harm. However, the effectiveness of interventions to control alcohol consumption in LMICs remains understudied. This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of alcohol regulatory interventions adopted in LMICs. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science was conducted on 10th August 2024. The search strategy included terms related to regulatory interventions and their impact on alcohol consumption, health, and other related outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the NIH, EPOC checklist, ISPOR-SDMD checklist and CASP quality assessment tools, and a narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the review findings. Of the 169 full texts screened, 62 studies were included in this review. Most of the studies were conducted in upper middle-income countries (n=48, 77%), seven were from lower middle-income countries, one from a low-income country and others were combinations of the above. Sixty percent of the included studies were of good quality. In terms of WHO alcohol policy domains, 18 studies focused on restriction of physical availability, 11 on pricing, one on marketing, 21 on drink driving, and 11 on a combination of all policy domains. Alcohol consumption-related outcomes were reported in 26 studies while health and other outcomes were reported in 25 and 14 studies respectively. Restrictions on physical availability of alcohol were largely effective across all outcomes while the pricing policy domain consistently demonstrated effectiveness in reducing alcohol consumption. The scarce evidence on marketing policy interventions was inconclusive; interventions targeting drink driving showed beneficial effects. The available evidence suggests that alcohol control policies are largely effective in LMICs. Further regular and statutory enforcement of these interventions is likely to improve their effectiveness.
酒精消费在全球范围内构成了重大的公共卫生挑战,低收入和中等收入国家承受着酒精相关危害的沉重负担。然而,在中低收入国家控制酒精消费的干预措施的有效性仍未得到充分研究。本文旨在探讨中低收入国家酒精管制干预措施的有效性。于2024年8月10日对MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO和Web of Science进行系统检索。搜索策略包括与监管干预及其对酒精消费、健康和其他相关结果的影响相关的术语。采用NIH、EPOC检查表、ISPOR-SDMD检查表和CASP质量评估工具评估偏倚风险,并进行叙述性综合来总结综述结果。在筛选的169篇全文中,有62篇研究被纳入本综述。大多数研究是在中高收入国家进行的(n=48, 77%),七项研究来自中低收入国家,一项来自低收入国家,其他研究是上述研究的组合。60%的纳入研究质量良好。就世卫组织酒精政策领域而言,18项研究侧重于限制实际可得性,11项研究侧重于定价,1项研究侧重于营销,21项研究侧重于酒驾,11项研究侧重于所有政策领域的组合。26项研究报告了与酒精消费相关的结果,而25项和14项研究分别报告了健康和其他结果。对酒精实物供应的限制在所有结果中基本有效,而定价政策领域在减少酒精消费方面一贯显示出有效性。缺乏关于市场政策干预的证据是不确定的;针对酒后驾驶的干预措施显示出有益的效果。现有证据表明,酒精控制政策在中低收入国家基本上是有效的。进一步定期和法定地执行这些干预措施可能会提高其有效性。
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries.
Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.