Addressing individual needs in mindful eating: a latent profile analysis and exploration of demographics and social-cognitive beliefs.

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2025.2519587

Christian E Preissner, Dennis de Ruijter, Anke Oenema, Hein de Vries

{"title":"Addressing individual needs in mindful eating: a latent profile analysis and exploration of demographics and social-cognitive beliefs.","authors":"Christian E Preissner, Dennis de Ruijter, Anke Oenema, Hein de Vries","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2025.2519587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To promote mindful eating it may be relevant to take different eating profiles into account. This prospective study aimed to (i) identify the existence of potential respondent subgroups regarding mindful eating and (ii) compare these profiles on socio-demographic characteristics and social-cognitive beliefs about mindful eating using the I-Change Model (ICM).Methods: Dutch adults (Mage = 52.6; 53% male) responded to an online survey at baseline (N = 615) and 3-months (n = 513) follow-up asking about social-cognitive beliefs about practicing mindful eating based on the ICM. Following a latent profile analysis of mindful eating facets, profiles at baseline were compared on social-cognitive beliefs at follow-up using a MANOVA with Tukey-adjusted post-hoc tests.Results: Three profiles were identified (1. low awareness, high acceptance; 2. high awareness, low acceptance; 3. moderate awareness, moderate acceptance). These profiles significantly differed in their demographics and social-cognitive beliefs about mindful eating (e.g., knowledge, perceived pros and cons, self-efficacy, intention and planning to adopt mindful eating).Discussion: Findings suggest the limitations of a one-size-fits-all approach to promoting mindful eating. Interventions may need to consider different recruitment and targeted strategies based on socio-demographic characteristics and social-cognitive beliefs to ensure different groups of individuals are represented in and can benefit from interventions in a safe and accessible way.","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"2519587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2025.2519587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To promote mindful eating it may be relevant to take different eating profiles into account. This prospective study aimed to (i) identify the existence of potential respondent subgroups regarding mindful eating and (ii) compare these profiles on socio-demographic characteristics and social-cognitive beliefs about mindful eating using the I-Change Model (ICM).

Methods: Dutch adults (M_age = 52.6; 53% male) responded to an online survey at baseline (N = 615) and 3-months (n = 513) follow-up asking about social-cognitive beliefs about practicing mindful eating based on the ICM. Following a latent profile analysis of mindful eating facets, profiles at baseline were compared on social-cognitive beliefs at follow-up using a MANOVA with Tukey-adjusted post-hoc tests.

Results: Three profiles were identified (1. low awareness, high acceptance; 2. high awareness, low acceptance; 3. moderate awareness, moderate acceptance). These profiles significantly differed in their demographics and social-cognitive beliefs about mindful eating (e.g., knowledge, perceived pros and cons, self-efficacy, intention and planning to adopt mindful eating).

Discussion: Findings suggest the limitations of a one-size-fits-all approach to promoting mindful eating. Interventions may need to consider different recruitment and targeted strategies based on socio-demographic characteristics and social-cognitive beliefs to ensure different groups of individuals are represented in and can benefit from interventions in a safe and accessible way.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在正念饮食中解决个人需求：人口统计学和社会认知信念的潜在概况分析和探索。

引言：为了促进正念饮食，考虑到不同的饮食习惯可能是相关的。本前瞻性研究旨在(i)确定关于正念饮食的潜在受访者亚群体的存在，（ii）使用i - change模型（ICM）比较这些社会人口特征和关于正念饮食的社会认知信念。方法：荷兰成人(Mage = 52.6；53%的男性)在基线（N = 615）和3个月（N = 513）的随访中回答了关于基于ICM练习正念饮食的社会认知信念的在线调查。在对正念饮食方面的潜在特征分析之后，基线的特征在随访中使用方差分析和tukey调整后的事后测试进行了社会认知信念的比较。结果：鉴定出3个剖面(1；认知度低，接受度高；2. 认知度高，接受度低；3. 适度意识，适度接受)。这些概况在人口统计学和关于正念饮食的社会认知信念（例如，知识、感知的利弊、自我效能、采用正念饮食的意图和计划）方面存在显著差异。讨论：研究结果表明，推广正念饮食的一刀切方法存在局限性。干预措施可能需要考虑基于社会人口特征和社会认知信念的不同招募和有针对性的策略，以确保不同群体的个人以安全和可获得的方式参与干预并从中受益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

3.70%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.