Efficacy and safety of omitting 5-fluorouracil bolus in combination chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yusuf Ilhan, Onur Yazdan Balcık, Elif Sahın, Aysegul Merc Cetınkaya, Elvina Almuradova, Murat Bardakcı, Cigdem Dınckal, Murat Karateke, Kadriye Bır Yucel, Arif Hakan Onder, Yakup Ergun
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of omitting 5-fluorouracil bolus in combination chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yusuf Ilhan, Onur Yazdan Balcık, Elif Sahın, Aysegul Merc Cetınkaya, Elvina Almuradova, Murat Bardakcı, Cigdem Dınckal, Murat Karateke, Kadriye Bır Yucel, Arif Hakan Onder, Yakup Ergun","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2527962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of omitting the 5-FU bolus in chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers on treatment efficacy and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 25 October 2024 to identify studies comparing 5-FU bolus and non-5-FU bolus regimens in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The studies included those reporting on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 7 studies with 12,698 patients. No significant differences in PFS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-1.07) or OS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03) were found between the 5-FU bolus and non-bolus groups. However, significantly higher rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.57) and any grade thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.80) were observed in the 5-FU bolus group. No significant differences were found for other toxicities like febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, or nausea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that the omission of 5-FU bolus from the commonly used 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens in gastrointestinal cancers, with the use of only 5-FU infusion, may reduce the risk of hematologic toxicities such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia without affecting survival outcomes in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024602968.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2527962","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of omitting the 5-FU bolus in chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers on treatment efficacy and toxicity.

Methods: We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 25 October 2024 to identify studies comparing 5-FU bolus and non-5-FU bolus regimens in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The studies included those reporting on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Results: The analysis included 7 studies with 12,698 patients. No significant differences in PFS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-1.07) or OS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03) were found between the 5-FU bolus and non-bolus groups. However, significantly higher rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.57) and any grade thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.80) were observed in the 5-FU bolus group. No significant differences were found for other toxicities like febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, or nausea.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the omission of 5-FU bolus from the commonly used 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens in gastrointestinal cancers, with the use of only 5-FU infusion, may reduce the risk of hematologic toxicities such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia without affecting survival outcomes in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.

Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024602968.

胃肠道肿瘤联合化疗方案中不使用5-氟尿嘧啶丸的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
本荟萃分析旨在评估胃肠道肿瘤化疗方案中不使用5-FU丸对治疗疗效和毒性的影响。方法:我们检索了截至2024年10月25日的主要数据库和会议记录,以确定比较胃肠道癌症患者5-FU丸和非5-FU丸方案的研究。这些研究包括报告转移性胃肠道癌症患者的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件的研究。结果:纳入7项研究,12698例患者。5-FU注射组和非注射组的PFS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-1.07)和OS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03)无显著差异。然而,在5-FU组中,观察到3-4级中性粒细胞减少(OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37-0.57)和任何级别血小板减少(OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35-0.80)的发生率明显更高。其他毒性如发热性中性粒细胞减少症、腹泻或恶心没有发现显著差异。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,在胃肠道癌症常用的基于5-FU的化疗方案中,不使用5-FU丸,只使用5-FU输注,可能会降低血液学毒性(如中性粒细胞减少症和血小板减少症)的风险,而不会影响转移性胃肠道癌症的生存结果。协议注册:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero标识为CRD42024602968。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信