Prelaryngoscopy predictors of first-attempt success in pediatric out-of-hospital intubation: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
François Javaudin, Mathilde Papin, Louis-Marie Bodet, Joël Jenvrin, Philippe Pes, Quentin Le Bastard
{"title":"Prelaryngoscopy predictors of first-attempt success in pediatric out-of-hospital intubation: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"François Javaudin, Mathilde Papin, Louis-Marie Bodet, Joël Jenvrin, Philippe Pes, Quentin Le Bastard","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric out-of-hospital tracheal intubation is associated with lower success rates compared with adult populations and presents distinct clinical challenges. Achieving success on the first attempt is critical, as multiple intubation attempts are associated with an increased risk of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to identify factors available before laryngoscopy that are independently associated with first-attempt success in pediatric out-of-hospital intubation and to evaluate the performance of a gestalt evaluation of intubation difficulty scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from a retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study conducted in three physician-staffed mobile intensive care units (ICUs) in France. The study included patients aged 0-17 years who required out-of-hospital airway management. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed including clinically relevant variables available before laryngoscope insertion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 206 pediatric patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 6 years (interquartile range: 1-16). The overall first-attempt success rate was 59.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): (52.7-66.4)]. In the multivariable analysis, patient age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): for 2-9 years, 2.33, 95% CI: (1.00-5.39); for 10-17 years, 3.86, 95% CI: (1.55-9.60); reference: 0-1 years] and presence of a soiled airway before laryngoscopy [aOR, 0.38, 95% CI: (0.20-0.71)] were independent predictors of successful intubation on the first attempt. The gestalt evaluation of the intubation difficulty scale yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.63, 95% CI: (0.56-0.71), and it showed only a weak correlation with the Cormack-Lehane grade (Kendall tau-b = 0.36; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort of pediatric tracheal intubation procedures performed by physician-staffed mobile ICUs, soiled airways and younger age were associated with a lower incidence of first-attempt success. The gestalt evaluation of intubation difficulty demonstrated poor discriminative ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric out-of-hospital tracheal intubation is associated with lower success rates compared with adult populations and presents distinct clinical challenges. Achieving success on the first attempt is critical, as multiple intubation attempts are associated with an increased risk of adverse events.

Objectives: The aims were to identify factors available before laryngoscopy that are independently associated with first-attempt success in pediatric out-of-hospital intubation and to evaluate the performance of a gestalt evaluation of intubation difficulty scale.

Methods: Data were extracted from a retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study conducted in three physician-staffed mobile intensive care units (ICUs) in France. The study included patients aged 0-17 years who required out-of-hospital airway management. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed including clinically relevant variables available before laryngoscope insertion.

Results: A total of 206 pediatric patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 6 years (interquartile range: 1-16). The overall first-attempt success rate was 59.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): (52.7-66.4)]. In the multivariable analysis, patient age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): for 2-9 years, 2.33, 95% CI: (1.00-5.39); for 10-17 years, 3.86, 95% CI: (1.55-9.60); reference: 0-1 years] and presence of a soiled airway before laryngoscopy [aOR, 0.38, 95% CI: (0.20-0.71)] were independent predictors of successful intubation on the first attempt. The gestalt evaluation of the intubation difficulty scale yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.63, 95% CI: (0.56-0.71), and it showed only a weak correlation with the Cormack-Lehane grade (Kendall tau-b = 0.36; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this cohort of pediatric tracheal intubation procedures performed by physician-staffed mobile ICUs, soiled airways and younger age were associated with a lower incidence of first-attempt success. The gestalt evaluation of intubation difficulty demonstrated poor discriminative ability.

儿童院外插管首次尝试成功的喉镜前预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:与成人相比,儿科院外气管插管的成功率较低,并且具有明显的临床挑战。在第一次尝试时取得成功是至关重要的,因为多次插管尝试与不良事件的风险增加有关。目的:目的是确定喉镜检查前可用的因素,这些因素与儿科院外插管首次尝试成功独立相关,并评估插管难度量表的格式塔评估效果。方法:数据来自一项回顾性、观察性、多中心队列研究,该研究在法国三家有医生的移动重症监护病房(icu)进行。该研究包括0-17岁需要院外气道管理的患者。主要结果是第一次插管成功。建立多变量logistic回归模型,包括插入喉镜前可用的临床相关变量。结果:共纳入206例儿童患者,中位年龄为6岁(四分位数范围:1-16岁)。总体首次尝试成功率为59.7%[95%置信区间(CI): 52.7-66.4]。在多变量分析中,患者年龄[调整优势比(aOR): 2-9岁,2.33,95% CI: (1.00-5.39);10-17年,3.86,95% CI:(1.55-9.60);[文献:0-1岁]和喉镜检查前气道脏污的存在[aOR, 0.38, 95% CI:(0.20-0.71)]是首次插管成功的独立预测因素。插管困难量表的完形评价在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.63,95% CI:(0.56 ~ 0.71),与Cormack-Lehane评分仅呈弱相关(Kendall τ -b = 0.36;结论:在由医生配备的移动icu进行的儿科气管插管手术队列中,气道脏污和年龄较小与首次尝试成功率较低相关。格式塔对插管困难的判断能力较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信