The clinical significance of thrombocytopenia in sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Basel F Alqeeq, Mohammed Ayyad, Maram Albandak, Waseem J Almadhoun, Mahmoud Kullab, Ahmed W Ghabayen, Mohammed Al-Tawil
{"title":"The clinical significance of thrombocytopenia in sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Basel F Alqeeq, Mohammed Ayyad, Maram Albandak, Waseem J Almadhoun, Mahmoud Kullab, Ahmed W Ghabayen, Mohammed Al-Tawil","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03188-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thrombocytopenia (TCP) is a common finding in critically ill patients that has been linked to a worse prognosis. Specifically, sepsis is a major risk factor for TCP. Several observational studies have examined the prognostic role of TCP and its correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search through Medline, Scopus and CENTRAL, from inception until June 2024, in order to identify studies that discussed the effects of TCP on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis or septic shock. This review was performed in accordance with the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Study endpoints were ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, major bleeding and mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included twelve studies enrolling 14,093 patients in this meta-analysis. TCP was diagnosed at intensive care unit (ICU) admission in 5481 (39%) patients; on the other hand, it was encountered during the course of ICU stay in 1474 (10%) cases. Patients with TCP had significantly higher risks of ICU mortality (Odds Ratio: 1.93, 95% CI [1.6-2.33]; p < 0.01). and 28-day mortality (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% CI [1.67, 2.35]; p < 0.00001). Furthermore, patients with severe TCP (platelet count < 50 * 10<sup>9</sup>/L) had even higher odds of ICU mortality (odds ratio: 3.38, 95% CI [2.25, 5.08]; p < 0.00001). Major bleeding events were significantly more frequent in patients with TCP (odds ratio: 3.26, 95% CI [2.26, 4.72]; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCP exhibits significant clinical implications in critically ill patients admitted with sepsis and is associated with enhanced mortality and worse clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, this meta-analysis quantifies the significant association between TCP and poor clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03188-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thrombocytopenia (TCP) is a common finding in critically ill patients that has been linked to a worse prognosis. Specifically, sepsis is a major risk factor for TCP. Several observational studies have examined the prognostic role of TCP and its correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search through Medline, Scopus and CENTRAL, from inception until June 2024, in order to identify studies that discussed the effects of TCP on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis or septic shock. This review was performed in accordance with the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Study endpoints were ICU mortality, 28-day mortality, major bleeding and mechanical ventilation.

Results: We included twelve studies enrolling 14,093 patients in this meta-analysis. TCP was diagnosed at intensive care unit (ICU) admission in 5481 (39%) patients; on the other hand, it was encountered during the course of ICU stay in 1474 (10%) cases. Patients with TCP had significantly higher risks of ICU mortality (Odds Ratio: 1.93, 95% CI [1.6-2.33]; p < 0.01). and 28-day mortality (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% CI [1.67, 2.35]; p < 0.00001). Furthermore, patients with severe TCP (platelet count < 50 * 109/L) had even higher odds of ICU mortality (odds ratio: 3.38, 95% CI [2.25, 5.08]; p < 0.00001). Major bleeding events were significantly more frequent in patients with TCP (odds ratio: 3.26, 95% CI [2.26, 4.72]; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: TCP exhibits significant clinical implications in critically ill patients admitted with sepsis and is associated with enhanced mortality and worse clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, this meta-analysis quantifies the significant association between TCP and poor clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

血小板减少症在脓毒症和感染性休克中的临床意义:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:血小板减少症(TCP)是危重患者的常见发现,与较差的预后有关。具体来说,脓毒症是TCP的主要危险因素。一些观察性研究已经检查了TCP在脓毒症患者中的预后作用及其与临床结果的相关性。方法:我们通过Medline, Scopus和CENTRAL进行了系统检索,从成立到2024年6月,以确定讨论TCP对脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者临床结局影响的研究。本综述按照流行病学观察性研究荟萃分析(MOOSE)指南进行。研究终点为ICU死亡率、28天死亡率、大出血和机械通气。结果:我们在meta分析中纳入了12项研究,共纳入14093例患者。5481例(39%)患者在重症监护病房(ICU)入院时被诊断为TCP;另一方面,1474例(10%)在ICU住院期间发生。TCP患者ICU死亡风险显著增高(优势比:1.93,95% CI [1.6-2.33];p 9/L)的ICU死亡率更高(优势比:3.38,95% CI [2.25, 5.08];p结论:TCP在脓毒症住院的危重患者中具有重要的临床意义,并与死亡率增加和临床结果恶化相关。尽管如此,该荟萃分析量化了TCP与脓毒症和感染性休克患者不良临床结果之间的显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信