Propofol-assisted deep extubation in the dental treatment of pediatrics: a randomized controlled triple-blind trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Wei Cui, Xiang Zhang, Ying Shang, Yun Liu
{"title":"Propofol-assisted deep extubation in the dental treatment of pediatrics: a randomized controlled triple-blind trial.","authors":"Wei Cui, Xiang Zhang, Ying Shang, Yun Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03170-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To verify whether propofol-assisted deep extubation is associated with fewer complications in pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 60 pediatric candidates undergoing elective dental interventions, with randomized allocation to either deep extubation (DE; n = 30) or awake extubation (AE; n = 30) protocols. The primary endpoint was the incidence of at least 1 respiratory adverse event, whereas time to extubation (TOE), time to wake-up (TOW), hemodynamic fluctuations during extubation, incidence of emergence agitation (EA), nasal obstruction, epistaxis, sore throat, and hoarse voice after extubation were the secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DE group reported significantly lower incidence of at least 1 respiratory adverse event (0.0% VS 23.3%, P = 0.016). The TOE was significantly shorter in the DE group, averaging 2.78 ± 0.87 min, compared to 5.50 ± 1.01 min in the AE group (P < .001). The TOW was longer in the DE group, with an average of 15.03 ± 3.44 min compared to 10.63 ± 1.52 min in the AE group (P < .001). The average value of mean arterial pressure (AVMAP) during extubation was lower in the DE group at 74.70 ± 13.35 mmHg, compared to 87.43 ± 15.31 mmHg in the AE group (P < .001). The average value of heart rate (AVHR) in the DE group was 108.37 ± 13.41 bpm, while in the AE group, it was 127.93 ± 20.74 bpm (P < .001). Additionally, the rates of sore throat and hoarse voice were significantly lower in the DE group (6.7% and 3.3%) than in the AE group (27% and 30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment, propofol-assisted deep extubation is superior, allowing for less extubation time without increasing airway complications. This technique provides a smoother extubation with fewer hemodynamic fluctuations and lower incidences of voice hoarseness and persistent coughing, provided that certain rules for deep extubation are followed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03170-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To verify whether propofol-assisted deep extubation is associated with fewer complications in pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment.

Materials and methods: This prospective study enrolled 60 pediatric candidates undergoing elective dental interventions, with randomized allocation to either deep extubation (DE; n = 30) or awake extubation (AE; n = 30) protocols. The primary endpoint was the incidence of at least 1 respiratory adverse event, whereas time to extubation (TOE), time to wake-up (TOW), hemodynamic fluctuations during extubation, incidence of emergence agitation (EA), nasal obstruction, epistaxis, sore throat, and hoarse voice after extubation were the secondary endpoints.

Results: The DE group reported significantly lower incidence of at least 1 respiratory adverse event (0.0% VS 23.3%, P = 0.016). The TOE was significantly shorter in the DE group, averaging 2.78 ± 0.87 min, compared to 5.50 ± 1.01 min in the AE group (P < .001). The TOW was longer in the DE group, with an average of 15.03 ± 3.44 min compared to 10.63 ± 1.52 min in the AE group (P < .001). The average value of mean arterial pressure (AVMAP) during extubation was lower in the DE group at 74.70 ± 13.35 mmHg, compared to 87.43 ± 15.31 mmHg in the AE group (P < .001). The average value of heart rate (AVHR) in the DE group was 108.37 ± 13.41 bpm, while in the AE group, it was 127.93 ± 20.74 bpm (P < .001). Additionally, the rates of sore throat and hoarse voice were significantly lower in the DE group (6.7% and 3.3%) than in the AE group (27% and 30%).

Conclusions: For pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment, propofol-assisted deep extubation is superior, allowing for less extubation time without increasing airway complications. This technique provides a smoother extubation with fewer hemodynamic fluctuations and lower incidences of voice hoarseness and persistent coughing, provided that certain rules for deep extubation are followed.

异丙酚辅助深度拔管在儿科牙科治疗中的应用:一项随机对照三盲试验。
目的:验证异丙酚辅助深度拔管是否与接受牙科治疗的儿科患者并发症减少有关。材料和方法:这项前瞻性研究招募了60名接受选择性牙科干预的儿科候选人,随机分配到深度拔管(DE);n = 30)或清醒拔管(AE;N = 30)方案。主要终点是至少1例呼吸不良事件的发生率,而拔管时间(TOE)、醒来时间(TOW)、拔管过程中的血流动力学波动、急激(EA)、鼻塞、鼻出血、喉咙痛和拔管后声音沙哑的发生率是次要终点。结果:DE组患者至少1次呼吸系统不良事件发生率明显低于对照组(0.0% VS 23.3%, P = 0.016)。DE组TOE平均为2.78±0.87 min, AE组平均为5.50±1.01 min,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。AE组平均TOW为10.63±1.52 min, DE组平均TOW为15.03±3.44 min (P < 0.001)。拔管时DE组平均动脉压平均值(AVMAP)为74.70±13.35 mmHg, AE组为87.43±15.31 mmHg (P < 0.001)。DE组平均心率(AVHR)为108.37±13.41 bpm, AE组平均心率(AVHR)为127.93±20.74 bpm (P < 0.001)。此外,DE组喉咙痛和声音沙哑的发生率(6.7%和3.3%)明显低于AE组(27%和30%)。结论:对于接受牙科治疗的儿科患者,异丙酚辅助深拔管是优越的,可以减少拔管时间,而不会增加气道并发症。如果遵循一定的深拔管规则,该技术提供更顺畅的拔管,血流动力学波动更少,声音嘶哑和持续咳嗽的发生率更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信