Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lei Cao, Yingying Xiang, Zhuoxi Wu, Qi Chen, Fang Chen, Guiying Yang, Hong Li
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lei Cao, Yingying Xiang, Zhuoxi Wu, Qi Chen, Fang Chen, Guiying Yang, Hong Li","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03196-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The overall benefits and potential risks of corticosteroids, frequently administered to critically ill patients remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid therapy in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or acute respiratory distress syndrome. We hypothesized that corticosteroids reduce short-term mortality in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception up to November 30, 2024. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials in human populations published in English. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RRs) and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was short-term mortality (28-day or nearest reported). Secondary outcomes included ICU/hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, ventilator-free days at 28 days, oxygenation index, reversed shock in sepsis or septic shock, and adverse events. We evaluated heterogeneity using I<sup>2</sup> and explored it using subgroup and meta-regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three randomized controlled trials (n = 10853) were included. Corticosteroids reduced short-term mortality in critically ill patients compared to placebo (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94). Corticosteroid treatment for critically ill patients reduced intensive care unit (MD, - 2.02 days; 95% CI, - 3.14 - -0.90) and hospital (MD, - 2.66 days; 95% CI, - 4.58 - -0.74) lengths of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD, - 4.24 days; 95% CI, - 6.38 - -2.10); it increased ventilator-free days at 28 days (MD, 2.83 days; 95% CI, 1.20-4.47), improved oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MD, 61.41 mmHg; 95% CI, 26.64-96.18), and reversed shock in sepsis or septic shock (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.35). No significant differences were observed in infection rates (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92-1.12) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.86-1.33). Hyperglycemia was more prevalent in the corticosteroid group (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subgroup analysis indicated that early initiation (≤ 72 h), low-dose (e.g., < 400 mg/day hydrocortisone equivalent), and prolonged (≥ 7 days) corticosteroid therapy was associated with reduced short-term mortality in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome. For septic shock, combination therapy (hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone) may enhance efficacy.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42024517843.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03196-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The overall benefits and potential risks of corticosteroids, frequently administered to critically ill patients remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid therapy in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia, sepsis or septic shock, or acute respiratory distress syndrome. We hypothesized that corticosteroids reduce short-term mortality in critically ill patients.

Methods: We performed a search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception up to November 30, 2024. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials in human populations published in English. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RRs) and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was short-term mortality (28-day or nearest reported). Secondary outcomes included ICU/hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, ventilator-free days at 28 days, oxygenation index, reversed shock in sepsis or septic shock, and adverse events. We evaluated heterogeneity using I2 and explored it using subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

Results: Forty-three randomized controlled trials (n = 10853) were included. Corticosteroids reduced short-term mortality in critically ill patients compared to placebo (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94). Corticosteroid treatment for critically ill patients reduced intensive care unit (MD, - 2.02 days; 95% CI, - 3.14 - -0.90) and hospital (MD, - 2.66 days; 95% CI, - 4.58 - -0.74) lengths of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD, - 4.24 days; 95% CI, - 6.38 - -2.10); it increased ventilator-free days at 28 days (MD, 2.83 days; 95% CI, 1.20-4.47), improved oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MD, 61.41 mmHg; 95% CI, 26.64-96.18), and reversed shock in sepsis or septic shock (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.35). No significant differences were observed in infection rates (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92-1.12) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.86-1.33). Hyperglycemia was more prevalent in the corticosteroid group (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14).

Conclusions: Subgroup analysis indicated that early initiation (≤ 72 h), low-dose (e.g., < 400 mg/day hydrocortisone equivalent), and prolonged (≥ 7 days) corticosteroid therapy was associated with reduced short-term mortality in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome. For septic shock, combination therapy (hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone) may enhance efficacy.

Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024517843.

皮质类固醇在危重患者中的疗效和安全性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:经常用于危重患者的皮质类固醇的总体获益和潜在风险仍不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了皮质类固醇治疗严重社区获得性肺炎、败血症或感染性休克或急性呼吸窘迫综合征危重患者的疗效和安全性。我们假设皮质类固醇可以降低危重病人的短期死亡率。方法:我们对Medline、Embase和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials从数据库建立到2024年11月30日进行了检索。这项研究仅限于用英语发表的人群随机对照试验。二分类结果报告为相对危险度(rr),连续结果报告为平均差异(md),均有95%置信区间(ci)。主要终点是短期死亡率(28天或最近报道)。次要结局包括ICU/住院时间、机械通气时间、28天无呼吸机天数、氧合指数、败血症或感染性休克的逆转休克和不良事件。我们使用I2评估异质性,并使用亚组和元回归分析对其进行探讨。结果:纳入43项随机对照试验(n = 10853)。与安慰剂相比,皮质类固醇降低了危重患者的短期死亡率(RR, 0.85;95% ci, 0.77-0.94)。重症患者皮质类固醇治疗减少重症监护病房(MD, - 2.02天;95% CI, - 3.14 - -0.90)和医院(MD, - 2.66天;95% CI, - 4.58 - -0.74)住院时间和机械通气持续时间(MD, - 4.24天;95% ci, - 6.38 - -2.10);28 d时增加无呼吸机天数(MD, 2.83 d);95% CI, 1.20-4.47),机械通气患者氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)改善(MD, 61.41 mmHg;95% CI, 26.64-96.18),以及败血症或脓毒性休克的逆转休克(RR, 1.20;95% ci, 1.06-1.35)。两组感染率差异无统计学意义(RR, 1.01;95% CI, 0.92-1.12)和胃肠道出血(RR, 1.07;95% ci, 0.86-1.33)。糖皮质激素组高血糖更普遍(RR, 1.10;95% ci, 1.06-1.14)。结论:亚组分析提示,早期启动(≤72 h)、低剂量(如:临床试验注册:PROSPERO: CRD42024517843)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信