Physical activities, longevity gene, and all-cause mortality among older adults: a prospective community-based cohort study.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lanjing Xu, Jun Wang, Xinwei Li, Yang Li, Chen Chen, Zinan Xu, Yuan Xia, Zihan Lu, Jinghui Zhou, Min Zhang, Yuan Wei, Bing Wu, Zheng Zhang, Fangyu Li, Yufei Luo, Guangdi Chen, Yuebin Lv, Xiaoming Shi
{"title":"Physical activities, longevity gene, and all-cause mortality among older adults: a prospective community-based cohort study.","authors":"Lanjing Xu, Jun Wang, Xinwei Li, Yang Li, Chen Chen, Zinan Xu, Yuan Xia, Zihan Lu, Jinghui Zhou, Min Zhang, Yuan Wei, Bing Wu, Zheng Zhang, Fangyu Li, Yufei Luo, Guangdi Chen, Yuebin Lv, Xiaoming Shi","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04176-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The health benefits of physical activity (PA) have been well recognized, while which types of PA are most beneficial are still unclear, especially for older adults. The study aimed to explore associations of different PAs (physical work, regular exercise, and leisure activities) with mortality among Chinese older adults, considering genetic risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 9690 older adults from the Chinese Longitudinal Health Longevity Survey (CLHLS, 1998-2018) were included. Self-reported PAs information on physical work, regular exercise, and leisure activities were collected through face-to-face interviews. Leisure activities were interviewed about their engagement in 6 typical activities (i.e., housework tasks, personal outdoor activities, gardening, rearing domestic animals/pets, playing cards/mahjong, and attending in social activities). A weighted genetic risk score (GRS) was constructed based on 11 lifespan-related loci and divided into two groups according to the median scores (0.21). The Cox proportional risk model was used to assess the association between different types of PAs and genetic risk with all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 63,832 person-years of follow-up, 5678 deaths were documented. The hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality between different PAs (lowest activity vs highest activity) were 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) for leisure activities, 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99) for regular exercise, and 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.01) for physical work, respectively. Compared with low leisure activities, high leisure activities were associated with 16% reduction in all-cause mortality for individuals with low longevity GRS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93), and 14% reduction in all-cause mortality for individuals with high longevity GRS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.96). Adherence to regular exercise was associated with 11% reduction in all-cause mortality for individuals with high longevity GRS (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97), while there was no statistically significance for those with low longevity GRS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06) compared with those without regular exercise. There was no additive or multiplicative interaction between PAs and longevity genetics (P<sub>interaction</sub> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leisure activities, as a low-risk, low-intensity, simple and inexpensive PA, rather than regular exercise, might bring the greatest health benefits, even for individuals with less longevity genes, highlighting the importance of providing individualized PA recommendations for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"361"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04176-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The health benefits of physical activity (PA) have been well recognized, while which types of PA are most beneficial are still unclear, especially for older adults. The study aimed to explore associations of different PAs (physical work, regular exercise, and leisure activities) with mortality among Chinese older adults, considering genetic risk.

Methods: A total of 9690 older adults from the Chinese Longitudinal Health Longevity Survey (CLHLS, 1998-2018) were included. Self-reported PAs information on physical work, regular exercise, and leisure activities were collected through face-to-face interviews. Leisure activities were interviewed about their engagement in 6 typical activities (i.e., housework tasks, personal outdoor activities, gardening, rearing domestic animals/pets, playing cards/mahjong, and attending in social activities). A weighted genetic risk score (GRS) was constructed based on 11 lifespan-related loci and divided into two groups according to the median scores (0.21). The Cox proportional risk model was used to assess the association between different types of PAs and genetic risk with all-cause mortality.

Results: During 63,832 person-years of follow-up, 5678 deaths were documented. The hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality between different PAs (lowest activity vs highest activity) were 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) for leisure activities, 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99) for regular exercise, and 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.01) for physical work, respectively. Compared with low leisure activities, high leisure activities were associated with 16% reduction in all-cause mortality for individuals with low longevity GRS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93), and 14% reduction in all-cause mortality for individuals with high longevity GRS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.96). Adherence to regular exercise was associated with 11% reduction in all-cause mortality for individuals with high longevity GRS (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97), while there was no statistically significance for those with low longevity GRS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06) compared with those without regular exercise. There was no additive or multiplicative interaction between PAs and longevity genetics (Pinteraction > 0.05).

Conclusions: Leisure activities, as a low-risk, low-intensity, simple and inexpensive PA, rather than regular exercise, might bring the greatest health benefits, even for individuals with less longevity genes, highlighting the importance of providing individualized PA recommendations for older adults.

老年人的体育活动、长寿基因和全因死亡率:一项前瞻性社区队列研究
背景:体育活动(PA)的健康益处已得到充分认识,但哪种类型的PA最有益仍不清楚,特别是对老年人。本研究旨在探讨在考虑遗传风险的情况下,中国老年人不同PAs(体力劳动、定期运动和休闲活动)与死亡率的关系。方法:纳入中国纵向健康寿命调查(CLHLS, 1998-2018)的9690名老年人。通过面对面访谈收集自我报告的体力工作、定期锻炼和休闲活动的pa信息。在休闲活动方面,调查受访者参与6项典型活动(即家务劳动、个人户外活动、园艺、饲养家畜/宠物、打牌/麻将和参加社交活动)的情况。基于11个与寿命相关的基因座构建加权遗传风险评分(GRS),并根据得分中位数(0.21)分为两组。Cox比例风险模型用于评估不同类型PAs和遗传风险与全因死亡率之间的关系。结果:在63,832人年的随访期间,记录了5678例死亡。不同活动量(最低活动量vs最高活动量)之间全因死亡率的危险比(hr)分别为:休闲活动0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92),定期运动0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99),体力劳动0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.01)。与低休闲活动相比,高休闲活动与低长寿GRS个体全因死亡率降低16%相关(HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93),与高长寿GRS个体全因死亡率降低14%相关(HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.96)。坚持定期运动与高寿命GRS个体的全因死亡率降低11%相关(HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97),而低寿命GRS个体与没有定期运动的个体相比,无统计学意义(HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06)。PAs与长寿遗传之间不存在加性或乘法互作(p互作>.05)。结论:休闲活动作为一种低风险、低强度、简单和廉价的活动,可能比常规运动带来最大的健康益处,即使对于长寿基因较少的个体来说也是如此,这突出了为老年人提供个性化活动建议的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信