Treatment and exercise strategies and their associations with pain and disability: a prospective cohort study of patients with long-lasting low back pain.
Anne Mette Schmidt, Tue Secher Jensen, Morten Fenger-Grøn, Lise Hestbæk
{"title":"Treatment and exercise strategies and their associations with pain and disability: a prospective cohort study of patients with long-lasting low back pain.","authors":"Anne Mette Schmidt, Tue Secher Jensen, Morten Fenger-Grøn, Lise Hestbæk","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe self-reported treatment and exercise strategies among patients with long-lasting low back pain (LBP) 1 month after consultation at a specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic and evaluate their associations with changes in pain and disability 1 and 3 months after consultation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study using questionnaire data before consultation (baseline) and 1 and 3 months after consultation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic, Denmark.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1686 patients with long-lasting LBP completed the baseline questionnaire; 908 patients responded at 1 month, of them 623 responded at 3 month.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were categorised by treatment (physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, physiotherapy+chiropractic treatment and no recommended treatment) and exercise strategy (exercise continued, exercise ceased, exercise initiated and not exercising).</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>Pain was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS: 0-10), and disability was assessed by the Oswestry disability index (ODI: 0-100).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1-month postconsultation, half of the patients received no recommended treatment; most others received physiotherapy (42%). Nearly half of the patients continued exercise, 28% continued to be inactive, and 22% initiated exercise. For the population as a whole, pain changed by -0.74 (95% CI -0.90; -0.58) and <b>-</b>1.02 (95% CI -1.22; -0.83) points on the NRS at 1<b>-</b> and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and disability by -2.65 (95% CI -3.51; -1.78) and -4.48 (95% CI -5.59; -3.38) points on the ODI. Differences between treatment strategies were small. However, the two groups not exercising improved less compared with those who continued exercise when adjusted for age, sex and baseline level (order of magnitude from 0.07 to 1.18 points on the NRS and from 4.01 to 9.08 points on the ODI). For pain, these group differences were statistically significant at 1 month (p<0.001 for the exercise ceased group and p=0.01 for those not exercising) but not at 3 months (p=0.87, respectively, p=0.21). For disability, the differences were statistically significant both at 1 month (p<0.001 for both groups) and 3 months (p=0.03 and <0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mean improvement was negligible, with no differences between treatment strategies. However, patients not exercising showed no or less improvement, highlighting the importance of exercise in managing long-lasting LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 7","pages":"e100554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To describe self-reported treatment and exercise strategies among patients with long-lasting low back pain (LBP) 1 month after consultation at a specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic and evaluate their associations with changes in pain and disability 1 and 3 months after consultation.
Design: Prospective cohort study using questionnaire data before consultation (baseline) and 1 and 3 months after consultation.
Setting: Specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic, Denmark.
Participants: 1686 patients with long-lasting LBP completed the baseline questionnaire; 908 patients responded at 1 month, of them 623 responded at 3 month.
Interventions: Patients were categorised by treatment (physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, physiotherapy+chiropractic treatment and no recommended treatment) and exercise strategy (exercise continued, exercise ceased, exercise initiated and not exercising).
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Pain was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS: 0-10), and disability was assessed by the Oswestry disability index (ODI: 0-100).
Results: 1-month postconsultation, half of the patients received no recommended treatment; most others received physiotherapy (42%). Nearly half of the patients continued exercise, 28% continued to be inactive, and 22% initiated exercise. For the population as a whole, pain changed by -0.74 (95% CI -0.90; -0.58) and -1.02 (95% CI -1.22; -0.83) points on the NRS at 1- and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and disability by -2.65 (95% CI -3.51; -1.78) and -4.48 (95% CI -5.59; -3.38) points on the ODI. Differences between treatment strategies were small. However, the two groups not exercising improved less compared with those who continued exercise when adjusted for age, sex and baseline level (order of magnitude from 0.07 to 1.18 points on the NRS and from 4.01 to 9.08 points on the ODI). For pain, these group differences were statistically significant at 1 month (p<0.001 for the exercise ceased group and p=0.01 for those not exercising) but not at 3 months (p=0.87, respectively, p=0.21). For disability, the differences were statistically significant both at 1 month (p<0.001 for both groups) and 3 months (p=0.03 and <0.01).
Conclusions: Mean improvement was negligible, with no differences between treatment strategies. However, patients not exercising showed no or less improvement, highlighting the importance of exercise in managing long-lasting LBP.
目的:描述在专科医院医学脊柱诊所会诊1个月后长期腰痛(LBP)患者自我报告的治疗和运动策略,并评估其与会诊1个月和3个月后疼痛和残疾变化的关系。设计:前瞻性队列研究,采用会诊前(基线)和会诊后1个月和3个月的问卷数据。环境:丹麦,以医院为基础的专业医学脊柱诊所。参与者:1686例长期LBP患者完成基线问卷;908例患者1个月缓解,其中623例患者3个月缓解。干预措施:患者按治疗(物理治疗、捏脊治疗、物理治疗+捏脊治疗和不推荐治疗)和运动策略(继续运动、停止运动、开始运动和不运动)进行分类。主要和次要结局指标:疼痛采用数字评定量表(NRS: 0-10)评估,残疾采用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI: 0-100)评估。结果:会诊1个月后,半数患者未接受推荐治疗;其他大多数接受物理治疗(42%)。近一半的患者继续运动,28%继续不运动,22%开始运动。对于整个人群,疼痛变化为-0.74 (95% CI -0.90;-0.58)和-1.02 (95% CI -1.22;随访1个月和3个月时,NRS评分分别为-0.83),残疾评分为-2.65 (95% CI -3.51;-1.78)和-4.48 (95% CI -5.59;ODI指数为-3.38)。治疗策略之间的差异很小。然而,在调整了年龄、性别和基线水平后(NRS的数量级从0.07到1.18分,ODI从4.01到9.08分),不运动的两组与继续运动的组相比改善较小。对于疼痛,这些组在1个月时的差异具有统计学意义(结论:平均改善可以忽略不计,治疗策略之间没有差异。然而,不运动的患者没有或只有很少的改善,这突出了运动对治疗长期腰痛的重要性。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.