Insurance type and risk of dementia diagnosis after traumatic brain injury: a study of 267 473 US civilians from 2000 to 2022.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Maya Deshmukh, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Paola Gilsanz, Rachel A Whitmer, Maxwell Boakye, Miriam Nuño
{"title":"Insurance type and risk of dementia diagnosis after traumatic brain injury: a study of 267 473 US civilians from 2000 to 2022.","authors":"Maya Deshmukh, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Paola Gilsanz, Rachel A Whitmer, Maxwell Boakye, Miriam Nuño","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how insurance influences the risk of a dementia diagnosis among a large, diverse cohort of US civilian adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) over a 22-year period.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study involving individuals diagnosed with TBI.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study used the Merative MarketScan Research Database, specifically drawing from the Commercial Claims and Encounters, Medicare Supplemental and Medicaid databases, from 2000 to 2022 in the USA. These databases provide comprehensive insights into healthcare services received by enrollees, including inpatient and outpatient services, outpatient prescription claims, clinical utilisation records and healthcare expenditures.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>267 473 adults aged 55 and older who were diagnosed with a TBI between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2022. Individuals with unknown TBI severity and dementia claims 2 years preceding TBI were excluded. TBI and dementia diagnoses were identified using International Classification of Disease 9th and 10th editions codes from inpatient and outpatient admission records.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>We compared the incidence of all-cause dementia across different insurance types to assess potential disparities in diagnosis following TBI. Cox proportional hazards models, with age as the time scale, were used to study the association between insurance type and dementia diagnosis following a TBI. Models were adjusted for key demographic variables, medical comorbidities and psychiatric conditions to account for potential confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 267 473 individuals with TBI, 12.7% were diagnosed with dementia over a mean follow-up period of 40 months (SD of 42 months). Dementia incidence differed significantly by insurance type, with 18.2% for Medicaid recipients, 17.3% for Medicare beneficiaries and only 2.3% among individuals with commercial insurance. The adjusted HR for dementia was notably higher among individuals enrolled on Medicaid (HR 2.9, 95% CI: 2.8 to 3.1) and Medicare (HR 2.1, 95% CI: 2.0 to 2.2), when compared with those with commercial insurance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with TBI covered by Medicaid and Medicare are significantly more likely to be diagnosed with dementia, with a 2.9-fold and 2.1-fold increase risk, respectively, compared with those with commercial insurance. Addressing insurance-related disparities in dementia diagnosis is crucial for building a more equitable healthcare system. It is essential that individuals with TBI cases, regardless of their insurance type, have access to comprehensive care and preventive interventions to achieve the best possible long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 7","pages":"e095893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate how insurance influences the risk of a dementia diagnosis among a large, diverse cohort of US civilian adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) over a 22-year period.

Design: This is a retrospective cohort study involving individuals diagnosed with TBI.

Setting: The study used the Merative MarketScan Research Database, specifically drawing from the Commercial Claims and Encounters, Medicare Supplemental and Medicaid databases, from 2000 to 2022 in the USA. These databases provide comprehensive insights into healthcare services received by enrollees, including inpatient and outpatient services, outpatient prescription claims, clinical utilisation records and healthcare expenditures.

Participants: 267 473 adults aged 55 and older who were diagnosed with a TBI between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2022. Individuals with unknown TBI severity and dementia claims 2 years preceding TBI were excluded. TBI and dementia diagnoses were identified using International Classification of Disease 9th and 10th editions codes from inpatient and outpatient admission records.

Interventions: None.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: We compared the incidence of all-cause dementia across different insurance types to assess potential disparities in diagnosis following TBI. Cox proportional hazards models, with age as the time scale, were used to study the association between insurance type and dementia diagnosis following a TBI. Models were adjusted for key demographic variables, medical comorbidities and psychiatric conditions to account for potential confounding.

Results: Of the 267 473 individuals with TBI, 12.7% were diagnosed with dementia over a mean follow-up period of 40 months (SD of 42 months). Dementia incidence differed significantly by insurance type, with 18.2% for Medicaid recipients, 17.3% for Medicare beneficiaries and only 2.3% among individuals with commercial insurance. The adjusted HR for dementia was notably higher among individuals enrolled on Medicaid (HR 2.9, 95% CI: 2.8 to 3.1) and Medicare (HR 2.1, 95% CI: 2.0 to 2.2), when compared with those with commercial insurance.

Conclusions: Individuals with TBI covered by Medicaid and Medicare are significantly more likely to be diagnosed with dementia, with a 2.9-fold and 2.1-fold increase risk, respectively, compared with those with commercial insurance. Addressing insurance-related disparities in dementia diagnosis is crucial for building a more equitable healthcare system. It is essential that individuals with TBI cases, regardless of their insurance type, have access to comprehensive care and preventive interventions to achieve the best possible long-term outcomes.

创伤性脑损伤后痴呆诊断的保险类型和风险:一项2000年至2022年267 473名美国平民的研究
目的:评估保险如何影响22年期间美国创伤性脑损伤(TBI)成年平民的痴呆诊断风险。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,涉及诊断为TBI的个体。背景:该研究使用了Merative MarketScan研究数据库,特别是从美国2000年至2022年的商业索赔和遭遇、医疗保险补充和医疗补助数据库中提取数据。这些数据库提供了对参保人接受的医疗保健服务的全面洞察,包括住院和门诊服务、门诊处方索赔、临床利用记录和医疗保健支出。参与者:2000年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间诊断为TBI的年龄在55岁及以上的264773名成年人。排除了TBI严重程度未知和TBI前2年声称患有痴呆的个体。使用国际疾病分类第9版和第10版代码从住院和门诊住院记录中确定TBI和痴呆诊断。干预措施:没有。主要和次要结局指标:我们比较了不同保险类型的全因痴呆发生率,以评估脑外伤后诊断的潜在差异。采用Cox比例风险模型,以年龄为时间尺度,研究保险类型与脑损伤后痴呆诊断之间的关系。模型根据关键的人口统计学变量、医学合并症和精神疾病进行了调整,以解释潜在的混淆。结果:在267 473名TBI患者中,12.7%的患者在平均40个月的随访期间(SD为42个月)被诊断为痴呆。不同保险类型的痴呆症发病率差异显著,医疗补助受益人为18.2%,医疗保险受益人为17.3%,而商业保险个人仅为2.3%。与商业保险相比,参加医疗补助计划(HR 2.9, 95%可信区间:2.8至3.1)和医疗保险(HR 2.1, 95%可信区间:2.0至2.2)的人患痴呆症的调整后HR明显更高。结论:医疗补助和医疗保险覆盖的脑损伤患者被诊断为痴呆的可能性明显更高,与商业保险相比,风险分别增加2.9倍和2.1倍。解决痴呆症诊断中与保险相关的差异对于建立更公平的医疗保健系统至关重要。对于脑损伤患者,无论其保险类型如何,都必须获得全面的护理和预防性干预措施,以实现最佳的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信