Multi-machine learning model based on radiomics features to predict prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Bin Wang, Zijian Gong, Peide Su, Guanghao Zhen, Tao Zeng, Yinquan Ye
{"title":"Multi-machine learning model based on radiomics features to predict prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Bin Wang, Zijian Gong, Peide Su, Guanghao Zhen, Tao Zeng, Yinquan Ye","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14279-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to construct a survival prognosis prediction model for muscle-invasive bladder cancer based on CT imaging features.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 91 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer were sourced from the TCGA and TCIA dataset and were divided into a training group (64 cases) and a validation group (27 cases). Additionally, 54 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer were retrospectively collected from our hospital to serve as an external test group; their enhanced CT imaging data were analyzed and processed to identify the most relevant radiomic features. Five distinct machine learning methods were employed to develop the optimal radiomics model, which was then combined with clinical data to create a nomogram model aimed at accurately predicting the overall survival (OS) of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The model's performance was ultimately assessed using various evaluation methods, including the ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curve, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight radiomic features were identified for modeling analysis. Among the models evaluated, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) In the prediction of OS performed the best. the 2-year AUCs were 0.859, 95% CI (0.767-0.952) for the training group, 0.850, 95% CI (0.705-0.995) for the validation group, and 0.700, 95% CI (0.520-0.880) for the external test group. The 3-year AUCs were 0.809, 95% CI (0.704-0.913) for the training group, 0.895, 95% CI (0.768-1.000) for the validation group, and 0.730, 95% CI (0.569-0.891) for the external test group. The nomogram model incorporating clinical data achieved superior results, the AUCs for predicting 2-year OS were 0.913 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98) for the training group, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.96) for the validation group, and 0.778 (95% CI: 0.69-0.94) for the external test group; for predicting 3-year OS, the AUCs were 0.837 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98) for the training group, 0.982 (95% CI: 0.84-1.0) for the validation group, and 0.785 (95% CI: 0.75-0.96) for the external test group. The calibration curve demonstrated excellent calibration of the model, while the decision curve and KM analysis indicated that the model possesses substantial clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GBM model, based on the radiomic features of enhanced CT imaging, holds significant potential for predicting the prognosis of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Furthermore, the combined model, which incorporates clinical features, demonstrates enhanced performance and is beneficial for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14279-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to construct a survival prognosis prediction model for muscle-invasive bladder cancer based on CT imaging features.

Materials and methods: A total of 91 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer were sourced from the TCGA and TCIA dataset and were divided into a training group (64 cases) and a validation group (27 cases). Additionally, 54 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer were retrospectively collected from our hospital to serve as an external test group; their enhanced CT imaging data were analyzed and processed to identify the most relevant radiomic features. Five distinct machine learning methods were employed to develop the optimal radiomics model, which was then combined with clinical data to create a nomogram model aimed at accurately predicting the overall survival (OS) of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The model's performance was ultimately assessed using various evaluation methods, including the ROC curve, calibration curve, decision curve, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis.

Results: Eight radiomic features were identified for modeling analysis. Among the models evaluated, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) In the prediction of OS performed the best. the 2-year AUCs were 0.859, 95% CI (0.767-0.952) for the training group, 0.850, 95% CI (0.705-0.995) for the validation group, and 0.700, 95% CI (0.520-0.880) for the external test group. The 3-year AUCs were 0.809, 95% CI (0.704-0.913) for the training group, 0.895, 95% CI (0.768-1.000) for the validation group, and 0.730, 95% CI (0.569-0.891) for the external test group. The nomogram model incorporating clinical data achieved superior results, the AUCs for predicting 2-year OS were 0.913 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98) for the training group, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.96) for the validation group, and 0.778 (95% CI: 0.69-0.94) for the external test group; for predicting 3-year OS, the AUCs were 0.837 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98) for the training group, 0.982 (95% CI: 0.84-1.0) for the validation group, and 0.785 (95% CI: 0.75-0.96) for the external test group. The calibration curve demonstrated excellent calibration of the model, while the decision curve and KM analysis indicated that the model possesses substantial clinical utility.

Conclusion: The GBM model, based on the radiomic features of enhanced CT imaging, holds significant potential for predicting the prognosis of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Furthermore, the combined model, which incorporates clinical features, demonstrates enhanced performance and is beneficial for clinical decision-making.

基于放射组学特征的多机器学习模型预测肌肉浸润性膀胱癌预后。
目的:建立基于CT影像特征的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌生存预后预测模型。材料和方法:91例肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者来自TCGA和TCIA数据集,分为训练组(64例)和验证组(27例)。回顾性收集我院肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者54例作为外试验组;他们的增强CT成像数据进行分析和处理,以确定最相关的放射学特征。采用五种不同的机器学习方法来开发最佳放射组学模型,然后将其与临床数据相结合,创建旨在准确预测肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者总生存期(OS)的nomogram模型。最终采用ROC曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线和Kaplan-Meier (KM)分析等多种评价方法对模型的性能进行评价。结果:确定了8个放射学特征进行建模分析。在评估的模型中,梯度增强机(Gradient Boosting Machine, GBM)对OS的预测效果最好。训练组的2年auc为0.859,95% CI(0.767-0.952),验证组为0.850,95% CI(0.705-0.995),外部试验组为0.700,95% CI(0.520-0.880)。训练组的3年auc为0.809,95% CI(0.704-0.913),验证组为0.895,95% CI(0.768-1.000),外部试验组为0.730,95% CI(0.569-0.891)。纳入临床资料的nomogram模型取得了较好的结果,训练组预测2年OS的auc为0.913 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98),验证组为0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.96),外部试验组为0.778 (95% CI: 0.69-0.94);对于预测3年OS,训练组的auc为0.837 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98),验证组的auc为0.982 (95% CI: 0.84-1.0),外部试验组的auc为0.785 (95% CI: 0.75-0.96)。校正曲线表明该模型具有良好的校正性,决策曲线和KM分析表明该模型具有较强的临床实用性。结论:基于增强CT影像放射学特征的GBM模型在预测肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者预后方面具有重要潜力。此外,结合临床特征的组合模型表现出更高的性能,有利于临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信