Clinical significance of contrast extravasation on computed tomography immediately after thermal ablation for hepatic tumors.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Dong Kyu Kim, Joon Ho Kwon, Kichang Han, Juil Park, Gyoung Min Kim, Man-Deuk Kim, Jong Yun Won
{"title":"Clinical significance of contrast extravasation on computed tomography immediately after thermal ablation for hepatic tumors.","authors":"Dong Kyu Kim, Joon Ho Kwon, Kichang Han, Juil Park, Gyoung Min Kim, Man-Deuk Kim, Jong Yun Won","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-04025-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the clinical significance of contrast extravasation observed on post-ablation computed tomography (CT) performed immediately following thermal ablation of hepatic tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2014 and December 2023, 1,274 patients with 1,745 primary or metastatic hepatic tumors underwent ablation, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation. Among them, 30 patients (median age: 66 years) with contrast extravasation observed on post-ablation CT scans were retrospectively analyzed. The pre- and post-ablation hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were measured. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 30 patients, angiography was performed in 6 patients. Contrast extravasation was observed on angiography in only two patients; contrast extravasation from the right inferior phrenic artery and intercostal artery was noted, and successful transarterial embolization was achieved. Conservative management was considered adequate without additional treatment in 28 of 30 patients. No significant differences were observed between the 1 day before and after ablation hemoglobin (12.9 g/dL; 12.0-13.8 g/dL vs. 12.5 g/dL; 11.5-13.8 g/dL, P = 0.102) and hematocrit (38.3%; 36.0-40.1% vs. 37.0%; 34.8-39.2%, P = 0.100) levels. During a mean follow up period of 23.3 ± 17.8 months, the LTPFS rates were 96.4% and 84.3% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The OS rate after the procedure was 96.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of contrast extravasation on post-ablation CT was not clinically significant, when extravasation confined to intrahepatic or venous origins. However, transarterial embolization is required if contrast extravasation is detected in the extrahepatic arteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04025-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the clinical significance of contrast extravasation observed on post-ablation computed tomography (CT) performed immediately following thermal ablation of hepatic tumors.

Methods: Between October 2014 and December 2023, 1,274 patients with 1,745 primary or metastatic hepatic tumors underwent ablation, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation. Among them, 30 patients (median age: 66 years) with contrast extravasation observed on post-ablation CT scans were retrospectively analyzed. The pre- and post-ablation hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were measured. Local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated.

Results: Among the 30 patients, angiography was performed in 6 patients. Contrast extravasation was observed on angiography in only two patients; contrast extravasation from the right inferior phrenic artery and intercostal artery was noted, and successful transarterial embolization was achieved. Conservative management was considered adequate without additional treatment in 28 of 30 patients. No significant differences were observed between the 1 day before and after ablation hemoglobin (12.9 g/dL; 12.0-13.8 g/dL vs. 12.5 g/dL; 11.5-13.8 g/dL, P = 0.102) and hematocrit (38.3%; 36.0-40.1% vs. 37.0%; 34.8-39.2%, P = 0.100) levels. During a mean follow up period of 23.3 ± 17.8 months, the LTPFS rates were 96.4% and 84.3% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The OS rate after the procedure was 96.7%.

Conclusion: The presence of contrast extravasation on post-ablation CT was not clinically significant, when extravasation confined to intrahepatic or venous origins. However, transarterial embolization is required if contrast extravasation is detected in the extrahepatic arteries.

肝肿瘤热消融后立即ct造影剂外渗的临床意义。
背景:评价肝肿瘤热消融后立即行CT扫描观察造影剂外渗的临床意义。方法:2014年10月至2023年12月,1274例原发性或转移性肝脏肿瘤患者接受了消融术,包括射频消融术、微波消融术和冷冻消融术。回顾性分析30例(中位年龄:66岁)消融后CT扫描观察到造影剂外渗的患者。测定消融前后血红蛋白和红细胞压积水平。评估局部肿瘤无进展生存期(LTPFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:30例患者中6例行血管造影。造影剂外渗仅2例;右膈下动脉及肋间动脉造影剂外渗,经动脉栓塞成功。30例患者中有28例认为保守治疗是足够的,无需额外治疗。消融前后1 d血红蛋白(12.9 g/dL;12.0 ~ 13.8 g/dL vs. 12.5 g/dL;11.5 - -13.8 g / dL, P = 0.102)和红细胞比容(38.3%;36.0-40.1% vs. 37.0%;34.8-39.2%, P = 0.100)。在平均23.3±17.8个月的随访期间,1年和2年的LTPFS分别为96.4%和84.3%。术后总生存率为96.7%。结论:当造影剂外渗局限于肝内或静脉源时,消融术后CT显示造影剂外渗无临床意义。然而,如果在肝外动脉检测到造影剂外渗,则需要经动脉栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信