Comparison of somatic mutations and clinicopathologic features of micropapillary and non-micropapillary colorectal carcinomas.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Zeynep Sagnak Yilmaz, Sibel Demir Kececi, Sevdegul Aydin Mungan, Ismail Saygin, Sulen Sarioglu
{"title":"Comparison of somatic mutations and clinicopathologic features of micropapillary and non-micropapillary colorectal carcinomas.","authors":"Zeynep Sagnak Yilmaz, Sibel Demir Kececi, Sevdegul Aydin Mungan, Ismail Saygin, Sulen Sarioglu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14487-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Micropapillary carcinoma (MPC) is a type of tumor that is histopathologically characterized by the presence of small papillary structures. Literature data on somatic mutations in MPCs are very limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred fifty-nine colon resection cases diagnosed with adenocarcinoma whose DNA mutations were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) were retrospectively reviewed. In 10 cases, the MPC area exceeded 5%. Chi-square test was used to evaluate histopathologic characteristics and somatic mutations in MPCs and non-MPCs. The relationship between mutations and clinicopathological parameters in all cases was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of MPC areas in carcinomas was associated with higher histologic grades (MPC: n = 6; 60% vs. non-MPC: n = 22; 14.8%), more advanced pathologic T (pT4 MPC: n = 5; 50% vs. non-MPC: n = 46; 34.6%) and N stages (pN2b MPC: n = 5; 50% vs. non-MPC: n = 26; 19.5%) and more frequent tumor deposits (MPC: n = 7; 87.5% vs. non-MPC: n = 44; 46.8%), lymphovascular invasion (MPC: n = 8; 80% vs. non-MPC: n = 83; 55.7%), and perineural invasion (MPC: n = 7; 70% vs. non-MPC: n = 42; 28.2%). A significant difference was found between MPCs and non-MPCs in terms of histological grade (p = 0.002) and perineural invasion (p = 0.01). TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA genes were the most frequently mutated genes in both MPCs and non-MPCs (TP53 MPC: n = 6; 100% vs. non-MPC: n = 72; 64.9% - KRAS MPC: n = 4; 40% vs. non-MPC: n = 66; 44.3% - PIK3CA MPC: n = 2; 20% vs. non-MPC: n = 32; 21.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in somatic mutations between the groups (TP53: p = 0.177, KRAS: p = 1.000, PIK3CA: p = 1.000, BRCA2: p = 0.181, ERBB2: p = 0.327, BRAF: p = 1.000, MAP2K1: p = 0.062). A significant difference was found between the TP53 mutant and TP53 wild-type groups in terms of tumor deposits (p = 0.033) and perineural invasion (p = 0.046). The male rate was significantly higher in KRAS wild-type cases (n = 69; 77.5%) compared to KRAS mutant cases (n = 38; 54.3%) (p = 0.002). The mean age, T and N staging were significantly different between PIK3CA mutant and PIK3CA wild-type cases (p = 0.01; p = 0.033; p = 0.019, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that MPCs had more advanced clinical stages and histological features associated with poor prognosis, such as advanced T and N stages, higher histological grade, presence of tumor deposits, lymphovascular and perineural invasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14487-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Micropapillary carcinoma (MPC) is a type of tumor that is histopathologically characterized by the presence of small papillary structures. Literature data on somatic mutations in MPCs are very limited.

Methods: One hundred fifty-nine colon resection cases diagnosed with adenocarcinoma whose DNA mutations were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) were retrospectively reviewed. In 10 cases, the MPC area exceeded 5%. Chi-square test was used to evaluate histopathologic characteristics and somatic mutations in MPCs and non-MPCs. The relationship between mutations and clinicopathological parameters in all cases was investigated.

Results: The presence of MPC areas in carcinomas was associated with higher histologic grades (MPC: n = 6; 60% vs. non-MPC: n = 22; 14.8%), more advanced pathologic T (pT4 MPC: n = 5; 50% vs. non-MPC: n = 46; 34.6%) and N stages (pN2b MPC: n = 5; 50% vs. non-MPC: n = 26; 19.5%) and more frequent tumor deposits (MPC: n = 7; 87.5% vs. non-MPC: n = 44; 46.8%), lymphovascular invasion (MPC: n = 8; 80% vs. non-MPC: n = 83; 55.7%), and perineural invasion (MPC: n = 7; 70% vs. non-MPC: n = 42; 28.2%). A significant difference was found between MPCs and non-MPCs in terms of histological grade (p = 0.002) and perineural invasion (p = 0.01). TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA genes were the most frequently mutated genes in both MPCs and non-MPCs (TP53 MPC: n = 6; 100% vs. non-MPC: n = 72; 64.9% - KRAS MPC: n = 4; 40% vs. non-MPC: n = 66; 44.3% - PIK3CA MPC: n = 2; 20% vs. non-MPC: n = 32; 21.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in somatic mutations between the groups (TP53: p = 0.177, KRAS: p = 1.000, PIK3CA: p = 1.000, BRCA2: p = 0.181, ERBB2: p = 0.327, BRAF: p = 1.000, MAP2K1: p = 0.062). A significant difference was found between the TP53 mutant and TP53 wild-type groups in terms of tumor deposits (p = 0.033) and perineural invasion (p = 0.046). The male rate was significantly higher in KRAS wild-type cases (n = 69; 77.5%) compared to KRAS mutant cases (n = 38; 54.3%) (p = 0.002). The mean age, T and N staging were significantly different between PIK3CA mutant and PIK3CA wild-type cases (p = 0.01; p = 0.033; p = 0.019, respectively).

Conclusions: We found that MPCs had more advanced clinical stages and histological features associated with poor prognosis, such as advanced T and N stages, higher histological grade, presence of tumor deposits, lymphovascular and perineural invasion.

微乳头状与非微乳头状结直肠癌的体细胞突变及临床病理特征比较。
背景:微乳头状癌(MPC)是一种组织病理学特征为存在小乳头状结构的肿瘤。关于MPCs体细胞突变的文献资料非常有限。方法:回顾性分析159例结肠切除术诊断为腺癌的病例,采用新一代测序(NGS)技术对其DNA突变进行分析。10例MPC面积超过5%。采用卡方检验评价MPCs和非MPCs的组织病理学特征和体细胞突变。研究了所有病例的突变与临床病理参数的关系。结果:肿瘤中MPC区域的存在与较高的组织学分级相关(MPC: n = 6;60% vs.非mpc: n = 22;14.8%),更晚期的病理T (pT4 MPC: n = 5;50% vs.非mpc: n = 46;34.6%)和N期(pN2b MPC: N = 5;50% vs.非mpc: n = 26;19.5%)和更频繁的肿瘤沉积(MPC: n = 7;87.5% vs.非mpc: n = 44;46.8%),淋巴血管侵犯(MPC: n = 8;80% vs.非mpc: n = 83;55.7%),神经周围浸润(MPC: n = 7;70% vs.非mpc: n = 42;28.2%)。MPCs与非MPCs在组织学分级(p = 0.002)和神经周围侵袭(p = 0.01)方面存在显著差异。TP53、KRAS和PIK3CA基因是MPCs和非MPCs中最常见的突变基因(TP53 MPC: n = 6;100% vs.非mpc: n = 72;64.9% - KRAS MPC: n = 4;40% vs.非mpc: n = 66;44.3% - PIK3CA MPC: n = 2;20% vs.非mpc: n = 32;21.5%)。各组间体细胞突变差异无统计学意义(TP53: p = 0.177, KRAS: p = 1.000, PIK3CA: p = 1.000, BRCA2: p = 0.181, ERBB2: p = 0.327, BRAF: p = 1.000, MAP2K1: p = 0.062)。TP53突变型组与野生型组在肿瘤沉积(p = 0.033)和神经周围浸润(p = 0.046)方面存在显著差异。KRAS野生型病例的男性发病率显著高于野生型(n = 69;77.5%),而KRAS突变病例(n = 38;54.3%) (p = 0.002)。PIK3CA突变型和PIK3CA野生型患者的平均年龄、T、N分期差异有统计学意义(p = 0.01;p = 0.033;P = 0.019)。结论:我们发现MPCs具有更晚期的临床分期和与预后不良相关的组织学特征,如晚期T和N分期,更高的组织学分级,存在肿瘤沉积物,淋巴血管和神经周围浸润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信