Healthy Lives 5 Axis Scale for individuals with complex health and social needs: assessment of validity and reliability.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Henry White, Peter Gonzalez, Sagi Shashar, Zoe Silver, Hannah Scott, Victor Novack
{"title":"Healthy Lives 5 Axis Scale for individuals with complex health and social needs: assessment of validity and reliability.","authors":"Henry White, Peter Gonzalez, Sagi Shashar, Zoe Silver, Hannah Scott, Victor Novack","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13069-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The field of complex care management for patients with urgent health and social challenges has rapidly grown, leading to calls for improved tools for measuring quality and outcomes. Most available measures were not developed specifically for a clinical context with a population with complex needs. The Healthy Lives 5 Axis Scale (HL-5) was created to fulfill this role. This concise, multidimensional scale measures key domains, including health-related functioning, physical and social needs, capacity for self-care, access, and utilization. The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater and test-retest reliability and the construct and concurrent validity of the HL-5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population included adults who attended an appointment with a primary care physician at an urban community health center. The reliability assessment of the HL-5 questionnaire included test-retest ratings by the same scorer and between two different scorers. Criterion convergent validity was evaluated by comparing the HL-5 domains with relevant domains of external questionnaires using Pearson correlation coefficients (r). The comparison measures have a strong evidence base, are widely used, and are nonproprietary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 64 participants, with a mean age of 39.1. Test-Retest Reliability, measured by the intraclass coefficient (ICC), was greater than 0.8 for Functioning, Needs, Utilization, and Access, indicating very strong internal consistency and 0.754 for Self-Care, representing good internal consistency. Criterion Validity for the axes, assessed by each axis' correlations with a criterion measure, was statistically significant at of p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study of the psychometric properties of the Healthy Lives 5 Axis Scale (HL-5) demonstrated its value for assessing patients' complex health and social needs. It showed high levels of reliability in a clinical setting with a diverse patient populations and strong correlations with well-established measures of functioning, needs, self-care, access, and utilization. HL-5 requires only a few minutes to complete and yields actionable results, demonstrating its potential for integration into the workflow of a primary care practice or care management program.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13069-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The field of complex care management for patients with urgent health and social challenges has rapidly grown, leading to calls for improved tools for measuring quality and outcomes. Most available measures were not developed specifically for a clinical context with a population with complex needs. The Healthy Lives 5 Axis Scale (HL-5) was created to fulfill this role. This concise, multidimensional scale measures key domains, including health-related functioning, physical and social needs, capacity for self-care, access, and utilization. The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater and test-retest reliability and the construct and concurrent validity of the HL-5.

Methods: The study population included adults who attended an appointment with a primary care physician at an urban community health center. The reliability assessment of the HL-5 questionnaire included test-retest ratings by the same scorer and between two different scorers. Criterion convergent validity was evaluated by comparing the HL-5 domains with relevant domains of external questionnaires using Pearson correlation coefficients (r). The comparison measures have a strong evidence base, are widely used, and are nonproprietary.

Results: There were 64 participants, with a mean age of 39.1. Test-Retest Reliability, measured by the intraclass coefficient (ICC), was greater than 0.8 for Functioning, Needs, Utilization, and Access, indicating very strong internal consistency and 0.754 for Self-Care, representing good internal consistency. Criterion Validity for the axes, assessed by each axis' correlations with a criterion measure, was statistically significant at of p < 0.05.

Conclusions: This study of the psychometric properties of the Healthy Lives 5 Axis Scale (HL-5) demonstrated its value for assessing patients' complex health and social needs. It showed high levels of reliability in a clinical setting with a diverse patient populations and strong correlations with well-established measures of functioning, needs, self-care, access, and utilization. HL-5 requires only a few minutes to complete and yields actionable results, demonstrating its potential for integration into the workflow of a primary care practice or care management program.

健康生活5轴量表用于具有复杂健康和社会需求的个体:效度和信度评估。
背景:对面临紧急健康和社会挑战的患者进行复杂护理管理的领域迅速发展,导致人们呼吁改进衡量质量和结果的工具。大多数可用的措施并不是专门针对具有复杂需求的人群的临床环境而制定的。健康生活5轴量表(HL-5)的创建就是为了履行这一职责。这一简洁的多维尺度衡量关键领域,包括与健康有关的功能、身体和社会需求、自我保健能力、获取和利用。本研究的目的是确定HL-5的解释信度和重测信度,以及HL-5的构效度和并发效度。方法:研究人群包括在城市社区卫生中心与初级保健医生预约的成年人。HL-5问卷的信度评估包括同一计分人的重测评分和两个不同计分人之间的重测评分。采用Pearson相关系数(r)将HL-5域与外部问卷相关域进行比较,评价标准收敛效度。比较方法有强有力的证据基础,被广泛使用,并且是非专有的。结果:参与者64人,平均年龄39.1岁。以类内系数(ICC)衡量的重测信度,功能、需求、利用和获取的信度大于0.8,表明内部一致性很强;自我护理的信度大于0.754,表明内部一致性较好。结论:健康生活5轴量表(HL-5)的心理测量特性的研究证明了它在评估患者复杂健康和社会需求方面的价值。它在临床环境中显示出高度的可靠性,具有不同的患者群体,并且与功能、需求、自我保健、获取和利用的既定措施有很强的相关性。HL-5只需几分钟即可完成,并产生可操作的结果,证明了其集成到初级保健实践或护理管理程序工作流程中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信