Decolonizing global health: a scoping review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Deena Mehjabeen, Kyle Patel, Rahul M Jindal
{"title":"Decolonizing global health: a scoping review.","authors":"Deena Mehjabeen, Kyle Patel, Rahul M Jindal","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12890-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We summarize research on decolonizing global health and highlight existing gaps, including the lack of a formal definition and clear aims for the movement. We examine the decolonization of global health curricula and authorship in indexed journals, aiming to build a shared understanding among global health scholars. The review included studies from all global regions to ensure comprehensive geographical representation. Of the 155 identified records, most were published from 2021 onward and predominantly originated from the Global North. Studies focusing solely on racism were excluded. Additionally, non-English publications and studies prior to 2019 were excluded, which may have limited insights from other perspectives, such as those available in Spanish from Latin America. The included studies centered on topics such as curricula, the COVID-19 pandemic, and equity in authorship for Global South scholars. However, despite these discussions, voices from the Global South remain underrepresented in indexed journals, and there is limited focus on actionable strategies for shifting power dynamics to foster true decolonization in global health governance and funding. To address these issues, we recommend mentorship programs targeted at academics from the Global South, focusing on research capacity-building, grant writing, and leadership development. We call for broader structural reforms, including equitable funding allocation, the decolonization of research agendas, and the dismantling of hierarchical systems that privilege voices from the Global North over the Global South. The creation of collaborative networks focused on decolonization is critical in demonstrating a commitment to dismantling oppressive systems and fostering equity. While some progress has been made, further research is needed to explore how funding, knowledge systems and publishing can be more equitably distributed, supporting a truly decolonized global health agenda that advances social justice and health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12890-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We summarize research on decolonizing global health and highlight existing gaps, including the lack of a formal definition and clear aims for the movement. We examine the decolonization of global health curricula and authorship in indexed journals, aiming to build a shared understanding among global health scholars. The review included studies from all global regions to ensure comprehensive geographical representation. Of the 155 identified records, most were published from 2021 onward and predominantly originated from the Global North. Studies focusing solely on racism were excluded. Additionally, non-English publications and studies prior to 2019 were excluded, which may have limited insights from other perspectives, such as those available in Spanish from Latin America. The included studies centered on topics such as curricula, the COVID-19 pandemic, and equity in authorship for Global South scholars. However, despite these discussions, voices from the Global South remain underrepresented in indexed journals, and there is limited focus on actionable strategies for shifting power dynamics to foster true decolonization in global health governance and funding. To address these issues, we recommend mentorship programs targeted at academics from the Global South, focusing on research capacity-building, grant writing, and leadership development. We call for broader structural reforms, including equitable funding allocation, the decolonization of research agendas, and the dismantling of hierarchical systems that privilege voices from the Global North over the Global South. The creation of collaborative networks focused on decolonization is critical in demonstrating a commitment to dismantling oppressive systems and fostering equity. While some progress has been made, further research is needed to explore how funding, knowledge systems and publishing can be more equitably distributed, supporting a truly decolonized global health agenda that advances social justice and health equity.

非殖民化全球卫生:范围审查。
我们总结了关于非殖民化全球卫生的研究,并强调了现有的差距,包括缺乏正式的定义和运动的明确目标。我们研究了全球卫生课程的非殖民化和索引期刊的作者身份,旨在建立全球卫生学者之间的共同理解。审查包括来自全球所有区域的研究,以确保全面的地理代表性。在已确定的155份记录中,大多数是在2021年以后发布的,主要来自全球北方。只关注种族主义的研究被排除在外。此外,2019年之前的非英语出版物和研究被排除在外,这些出版物和研究可能从其他角度获得的见解有限,例如来自拉丁美洲的西班牙语版本。纳入的研究集中在课程、COVID-19大流行和全球南方学者的作者平等等主题上。然而,尽管进行了这些讨论,但全球南方的声音在索引期刊中的代表性仍然不足,而且对转移权力动态以促进全球卫生治理和筹资方面真正非殖民化的可操作战略的关注有限。为了解决这些问题,我们建议针对来自全球南方的学者的指导计划,重点是研究能力建设,拨款写作和领导力发展。我们呼吁进行更广泛的结构性改革,包括公平的资金分配,研究议程的非殖民化,以及拆除使全球北方的声音凌驾于全球南方的等级制度。建立以非殖民化为重点的合作网络对于表明对拆除压迫制度和促进公平的承诺至关重要。虽然取得了一些进展,但还需要进一步研究,探索如何更公平地分配资金、知识系统和出版,支持真正非殖民化的全球卫生议程,促进社会正义和卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信