Luka Petravić, Kaja Gril Rogina, Tit Albreht, Andreja Kukec, Janez Žibert
{"title":"Prognostic models for predicting patient arrivals in emergency departments: an updated systematic review and research agenda.","authors":"Luka Petravić, Kaja Gril Rogina, Tit Albreht, Andreja Kukec, Janez Žibert","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01250-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments (ED) are struggling with an increased influx of patients. One of the methods to help departments prepare for surges of admittance is time series forecasting (TSF). The aim of this study was to create an overview of current literature to help guide future research. Firstly, we aimed to identify external variables used. Secondly, we tried to identify TSF methods used and their performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included model development or validation studies that were forecasting patient arrivals to the ED and used external variables. We included studies on any forecast horizon and any forecasting methodology. Literature search was done through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Embase databases. We extracted data on methods and variables used. The study is reported according to TRIPOD-SRMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST and authors' own dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 30 studies. Our analysis has identified 10 different groups of variables used in models. Weather and calendar variables were commonly used. We found 3 different families of TSF methods. However, none of the studies followed reporting guidelines and model code was seldom published.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results identify the need for better reported results of model development and validation to better understand the role of external variables used in created models, as well as for more uniform reporting of results between different research groups and external validation of created models. Based on our findings, we also suggest a future research agenda for this field.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01250-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Emergency departments (ED) are struggling with an increased influx of patients. One of the methods to help departments prepare for surges of admittance is time series forecasting (TSF). The aim of this study was to create an overview of current literature to help guide future research. Firstly, we aimed to identify external variables used. Secondly, we tried to identify TSF methods used and their performance.
Methods: We included model development or validation studies that were forecasting patient arrivals to the ED and used external variables. We included studies on any forecast horizon and any forecasting methodology. Literature search was done through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Embase databases. We extracted data on methods and variables used. The study is reported according to TRIPOD-SRMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST and authors' own dimensions.
Results: We included 30 studies. Our analysis has identified 10 different groups of variables used in models. Weather and calendar variables were commonly used. We found 3 different families of TSF methods. However, none of the studies followed reporting guidelines and model code was seldom published.
Conclusions: Our results identify the need for better reported results of model development and validation to better understand the role of external variables used in created models, as well as for more uniform reporting of results between different research groups and external validation of created models. Based on our findings, we also suggest a future research agenda for this field.
背景:急诊科(ED)正在努力应对越来越多的患者涌入。时间序列预测(TSF)是帮助各院系应对入院人数激增的方法之一。本研究的目的是对当前文献进行概述,以帮助指导未来的研究。首先,我们的目标是确定所使用的外部变量。其次,我们试图确定所使用的TSF方法及其性能。方法:我们纳入了预测患者到达急诊科的模型开发或验证研究,并使用了外部变量。我们纳入了任何预测范围和任何预测方法的研究。文献检索通过PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL和Embase数据库完成。我们提取了所用方法和变量的数据。这项研究是根据TRIPOD-SRMA指南报道的。使用PROBAST和作者自己的量表评估偏倚风险。结果:我们纳入了30项研究。我们的分析已经确定了模型中使用的10组不同的变量。通常使用天气和日历变量。我们发现了三种不同的TSF方法。然而,没有一项研究遵循报告准则,模型代码也很少发表。结论:我们的研究结果表明,需要更好地报告模型开发和验证的结果,以便更好地理解创建模型中使用的外部变量的作用,以及在不同研究小组之间更统一地报告结果和创建模型的外部验证。基于我们的发现,我们还提出了该领域未来的研究议程。临床试验号:不适用。
期刊介绍:
BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.