Comparison of positive expiratory pressure device versus non-invasive ventilation on outcomes in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the emergency department.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emine Sarcan, Ahmet Burak Erdem, Merve Yazla, Şerife Büşra Uysal, Elif Çelikel
{"title":"Comparison of positive expiratory pressure device versus non-invasive ventilation on outcomes in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the emergency department.","authors":"Emine Sarcan, Ahmet Burak Erdem, Merve Yazla, Şerife Büşra Uysal, Elif Çelikel","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01267-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are among the most common reasons for emergency department visits. In patients who develop hypercapnic respiratory failure, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is generally the preferred treatment. However, in overcrowded emergency departments, the number of mechanical ventilation devices may be insufficient. In such situations, positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices can be utilized. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the PEP device (EzPAP<sup>®</sup>) compared to NIV for the management of exacerbations of COPD in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted on 103 patients who presented to the emergency department with exacerbations of COPD and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure between November 2023 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: EzPAP<sup>®</sup> (E) and NIV (N). Spirometric parameters, arterial blood gas values, hospital admission rates, and 30-day mortality rates were compared before and after treatment in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients were included in the study (N: 49, E: 54). In Group N, no statistically significant increase was observed in FEV₁ and FVC after treatment (p = 0.120). A statistically significant increase in FEV₁ and FVC was detected in the EzPAP group (p < 0.001). An increase in oxygen saturation and an improvement in PaCO₂ and lactate levels were observed in both groups (p < 0.001). The difference in blood gas values before and after treatment (delta = Δ) was not statistically significant between the two groups. However, ΔFEV₁ and ΔFVC were significantly higher in the EzPAP group compared to the NIV group (p = 0.007, p = 0.022). The hospital admission rate was higher in the NIV group than in the EzPAP<sup>®</sup> group (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EzPAP<sup>®</sup> may be a suitable option for use in overcrowded emergency departments, as it demonstrates efficacy comparable to NIV in the management of exacerbations in COPD. Additionally, it can also be considered as a treatment alternative in situations where the number of mechanical ventilation devices for NIV is insufficient, such as during a pandemic.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials Number: NCT06561464 Registration Date: 07/08/2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01267-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are among the most common reasons for emergency department visits. In patients who develop hypercapnic respiratory failure, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is generally the preferred treatment. However, in overcrowded emergency departments, the number of mechanical ventilation devices may be insufficient. In such situations, positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices can be utilized. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the PEP device (EzPAP®) compared to NIV for the management of exacerbations of COPD in the emergency department.

Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted on 103 patients who presented to the emergency department with exacerbations of COPD and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure between November 2023 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: EzPAP® (E) and NIV (N). Spirometric parameters, arterial blood gas values, hospital admission rates, and 30-day mortality rates were compared before and after treatment in both groups.

Results: A total of 103 patients were included in the study (N: 49, E: 54). In Group N, no statistically significant increase was observed in FEV₁ and FVC after treatment (p = 0.120). A statistically significant increase in FEV₁ and FVC was detected in the EzPAP group (p < 0.001). An increase in oxygen saturation and an improvement in PaCO₂ and lactate levels were observed in both groups (p < 0.001). The difference in blood gas values before and after treatment (delta = Δ) was not statistically significant between the two groups. However, ΔFEV₁ and ΔFVC were significantly higher in the EzPAP group compared to the NIV group (p = 0.007, p = 0.022). The hospital admission rate was higher in the NIV group than in the EzPAP® group (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: EzPAP® may be a suitable option for use in overcrowded emergency departments, as it demonstrates efficacy comparable to NIV in the management of exacerbations in COPD. Additionally, it can also be considered as a treatment alternative in situations where the number of mechanical ventilation devices for NIV is insufficient, such as during a pandemic.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials Number: NCT06561464 Registration Date: 07/08/2024.

呼气正压通气与无创通气对急诊科慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期预后的比较
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重是急诊科就诊的最常见原因之一。对于发生高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭的患者,无创机械通气(NIV)通常是首选的治疗方法。然而,在人满为患的急诊科,机械通风装置的数量可能不足。在这种情况下,可以使用呼气正压(PEP)装置。本研究旨在评价PEP装置(EzPAP®)与NIV在急诊科治疗COPD加重的临床疗效。方法:这项前瞻性、随机对照研究纳入了2023年11月至2024年4月期间因COPD加重和急性高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭而就诊于急诊科的103例患者。患者分为EzPAP®(E)和NIV (N)两组。比较两组治疗前后肺活量测定参数、动脉血气值、住院率和30天死亡率。结果:共纳入103例患者(N: 49, E: 54)。N组治疗后FEV 1和FVC均无统计学意义升高(p = 0.120)。EzPAP组FEV 1和FVC升高有统计学意义(p®组(p = 0.04)。结论:EzPAP®可能是在拥挤的急诊科使用的合适选择,因为它在慢性阻塞性肺病加重的管理中显示出与NIV相当的疗效。此外,在大流行期间,如NIV机械通气装置数量不足的情况下,也可以将其视为一种替代治疗方法。试验注册:ClinicalTrials编号:NCT06561464注册日期:07/08/2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信