Managing borderline personality disorder within the NDIS: challenges and opportunities.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Cale Johnstone, Ben Bernard, Alex Holmes
{"title":"Managing borderline personality disorder within the NDIS: challenges and opportunities.","authors":"Cale Johnstone, Ben Bernard, Alex Holmes","doi":"10.1177/10398562251355156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis paper describes a case of borderline personality disorder (BPD) receiving National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) services and managed by an Area Mental Health Services (AMHS). It aims to explore the challenges encountered and identify useful principles of shared management.ConclusionsMental health guidelines for BPD highlight the importance of using an explicit and integrated theoretical approach and adequate clinician training. NDIS has a strong consumer-led focus, putting individuals in charge of their own care including choosing their providers and how workers address their needs. Disability support workers are not required to have any mental health training and are not provided with supervision. Initially an escalating cycle of affective instability, crisis, reduced self-agency and increasing NDIS support was observed. The support workers were placed in a vulnerable position. Integrated care required the intervention of a state-wide service.The provision of psychosocial support under the NDIS, especially for those with BPD, is in a process of development and an argument for more specific and specialised NDIS services can easily be made. Currently, at the very least, mental health clinicians need to consider whether more support is always better when considering the role of the NDIS in individuals with BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562251355156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251355156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThis paper describes a case of borderline personality disorder (BPD) receiving National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) services and managed by an Area Mental Health Services (AMHS). It aims to explore the challenges encountered and identify useful principles of shared management.ConclusionsMental health guidelines for BPD highlight the importance of using an explicit and integrated theoretical approach and adequate clinician training. NDIS has a strong consumer-led focus, putting individuals in charge of their own care including choosing their providers and how workers address their needs. Disability support workers are not required to have any mental health training and are not provided with supervision. Initially an escalating cycle of affective instability, crisis, reduced self-agency and increasing NDIS support was observed. The support workers were placed in a vulnerable position. Integrated care required the intervention of a state-wide service.The provision of psychosocial support under the NDIS, especially for those with BPD, is in a process of development and an argument for more specific and specialised NDIS services can easily be made. Currently, at the very least, mental health clinicians need to consider whether more support is always better when considering the role of the NDIS in individuals with BPD.

在NDIS中管理边缘型人格障碍:挑战与机遇。
目的本文描述了一例边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者接受国家残疾保险计划(NDIS)服务,并由地区精神卫生服务(AMHS)管理。它旨在探讨所遇到的挑战,并确定共享管理的有用原则。结论BPD的心理健康指南强调了使用明确和综合的理论方法和充分的临床医生培训的重要性。NDIS以消费者为导向,让个人负责自己的护理,包括选择供应商以及员工如何满足他们的需求。残疾支助工作人员不需要接受任何心理健康培训,也不受监督。最初观察到一个不断升级的情感不稳定、危机、自我能动性降低和NDIS支持增加的循环。后勤人员被置于易受伤害的地位。综合护理需要全州服务机构的介入。根据NDIS提供的社会心理支持,特别是对那些患有BPD的人,正在发展过程中,很容易提出更具体和专门的NDIS服务的论点。目前,至少,当考虑NDIS在BPD患者中的作用时,心理健康临床医生需要考虑更多的支持是否总是更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信