Interindividual and sex differences in resilience and vulnerability to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): insights from animal models.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Giulia Federica Mancini, Sebastiano Alfio Torrisi, Eva Myriam Goussivi Viho, Onno Cornelis Meijer, Gian Marco Leggio, Patrizia Campolongo
{"title":"Interindividual and sex differences in resilience and vulnerability to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): insights from animal models.","authors":"Giulia Federica Mancini, Sebastiano Alfio Torrisi, Eva Myriam Goussivi Viho, Onno Cornelis Meijer, Gian Marco Leggio, Patrizia Campolongo","doi":"10.1186/s13293-025-00732-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress triggers many responses including behavioral strategies to cope with the environment and to maintain homeostasis. Notably, the experience of stressful events is highly subjective. In fact, in susceptible individuals, primary adaptation responses can fail leading to maladaptive mechanisms and to the subsequent development of stress-related disorders (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder; PTSD). However, the mechanisms underlying interindividual variability in stress adaptation are still to be elucidated. Animal models are widely recognized as essential scientific tools to understand the neurobiological underpinnings of stress susceptibility/resilience, and as tools to identify novel and personalized interventions to treat (and prevent) such disorders in humans. Experimental models have however several limitations, as validity criteria can be very problematic when modeling psychiatric disorders. Also, while sex dimorphism crucially contributes to the risk for stress-related diseases, several frequently used models overlooked sex differences in the interindividual variability in response to stress. In this review, we describe the interindividual and sex differences in susceptibility and resilience in stress-related disorders, with a particular focus on PTSD. Further, we examine aspects of animal models of PTSD that can be improved to obtain higher translational value.</p>","PeriodicalId":8890,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sex Differences","volume":"16 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sex Differences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-025-00732-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress triggers many responses including behavioral strategies to cope with the environment and to maintain homeostasis. Notably, the experience of stressful events is highly subjective. In fact, in susceptible individuals, primary adaptation responses can fail leading to maladaptive mechanisms and to the subsequent development of stress-related disorders (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder; PTSD). However, the mechanisms underlying interindividual variability in stress adaptation are still to be elucidated. Animal models are widely recognized as essential scientific tools to understand the neurobiological underpinnings of stress susceptibility/resilience, and as tools to identify novel and personalized interventions to treat (and prevent) such disorders in humans. Experimental models have however several limitations, as validity criteria can be very problematic when modeling psychiatric disorders. Also, while sex dimorphism crucially contributes to the risk for stress-related diseases, several frequently used models overlooked sex differences in the interindividual variability in response to stress. In this review, we describe the interindividual and sex differences in susceptibility and resilience in stress-related disorders, with a particular focus on PTSD. Further, we examine aspects of animal models of PTSD that can be improved to obtain higher translational value.

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的恢复和易受伤害的个体间和性别差异:来自动物模型的见解。
压力触发许多反应,包括应对环境和维持体内平衡的行为策略。值得注意的是,压力事件的体验是高度主观的。事实上,在易感个体中,初级适应反应可能失败,导致适应不良机制,并随后发展为压力相关障碍(例如,创伤后应激障碍;创伤后应激障碍)。然而,应激适应中个体间差异的机制仍有待阐明。动物模型被广泛认为是理解应激易感性/恢复力的神经生物学基础的重要科学工具,也是确定治疗(和预防)人类此类疾病的新型和个性化干预措施的工具。然而,实验模型有一些局限性,因为在模拟精神疾病时,有效性标准可能非常有问题。此外,尽管性别二态性对压力相关疾病的风险起着至关重要的作用,但一些经常使用的模型忽略了个体间对压力反应差异的性别差异。在这篇综述中,我们描述了应激相关疾病的易感性和恢复力的个体间和性别差异,特别关注创伤后应激障碍。此外,我们还研究了创伤后应激障碍动物模型可以改进的方面,以获得更高的转化价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology of Sex Differences
Biology of Sex Differences ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sex Differences is a unique scientific journal focusing on sex differences in physiology, behavior, and disease from molecular to phenotypic levels, incorporating both basic and clinical research. The journal aims to enhance understanding of basic principles and facilitate the development of therapeutic and diagnostic tools specific to sex differences. As an open-access journal, it is the official publication of the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences and co-published by the Society for Women's Health Research. Topical areas include, but are not limited to sex differences in: genomics; the microbiome; epigenetics; molecular and cell biology; tissue biology; physiology; interaction of tissue systems, in any system including adipose, behavioral, cardiovascular, immune, muscular, neural, renal, and skeletal; clinical studies bearing on sex differences in disease or response to therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信