An Indocyanine Green Light for Cross-Leg Free Flap Division: Presentation of the Technique and Review of Literature.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Can Ege Yalcin, Ece Davutluoglu, Levent Demir, Mehmet Demir, Berrak Karatan, Hakan Arslan
{"title":"An Indocyanine Green Light for Cross-Leg Free Flap Division: Presentation of the Technique and Review of Literature.","authors":"Can Ege Yalcin, Ece Davutluoglu, Levent Demir, Mehmet Demir, Berrak Karatan, Hakan Arslan","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cross-leg free flaps (CLFFs) and cross-leg cable bridge flaps (CLCBFs) are essential techniques in reconstructive surgery for complex lower limb defects when local options or suitable recipient vessels are unavailable. Although the surgical approaches are well established, standardized protocols for flap division, ischemic preconditioning, and perfusion assessment are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents a systematic review of the literature on CLFFs and CLCBFs, focusing on division timing, conditioning methods, and perfusion evaluation. A total of 38 studies involving 319 patients were identified through PubMed and EuroPMC searches in March 2025. Additionally, we present a case of a 23-year-old man with a 25 × 15-cm tibial defect reconstructed using a cross-leg latissimus dorsi free flap, where indocyanine green (ICG) angiography was employed to assess perfusion prior to flap division.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pedicle division was most commonly performed between 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Ischemic preconditioning-typically through intermittent clamping-was reported in 54% of studies. Among studies that described perfusion assessment, 75% used clinical pedicle clamping, whereas 25% utilized ICG angiography. Our case demonstrated the successful application of ICG imaging to confirm neovascularization and enable safe, early flap division without complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CLFF and CLCBF techniques are effective for limb salvage but require individualized postoperative protocols. Ischemic preconditioning and objective perfusion assessment, particularly using ICG angiography, may support earlier and safer flap division, minimizing patient morbidity and hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cross-leg free flaps (CLFFs) and cross-leg cable bridge flaps (CLCBFs) are essential techniques in reconstructive surgery for complex lower limb defects when local options or suitable recipient vessels are unavailable. Although the surgical approaches are well established, standardized protocols for flap division, ischemic preconditioning, and perfusion assessment are lacking.

Methods: This study presents a systematic review of the literature on CLFFs and CLCBFs, focusing on division timing, conditioning methods, and perfusion evaluation. A total of 38 studies involving 319 patients were identified through PubMed and EuroPMC searches in March 2025. Additionally, we present a case of a 23-year-old man with a 25 × 15-cm tibial defect reconstructed using a cross-leg latissimus dorsi free flap, where indocyanine green (ICG) angiography was employed to assess perfusion prior to flap division.

Results: Pedicle division was most commonly performed between 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Ischemic preconditioning-typically through intermittent clamping-was reported in 54% of studies. Among studies that described perfusion assessment, 75% used clinical pedicle clamping, whereas 25% utilized ICG angiography. Our case demonstrated the successful application of ICG imaging to confirm neovascularization and enable safe, early flap division without complications.

Conclusion: CLFF and CLCBF techniques are effective for limb salvage but require individualized postoperative protocols. Ischemic preconditioning and objective perfusion assessment, particularly using ICG angiography, may support earlier and safer flap division, minimizing patient morbidity and hospital stay.

跨腿自由皮瓣分割的吲哚菁绿灯:技术介绍及文献复习。
背景:当无法获得局部选择或合适的受体血管时,交叉腿游离皮瓣(CLFFs)和交叉腿索桥皮瓣(CLCBFs)是复杂下肢缺损重建手术的基本技术。虽然手术入路已经建立,但是对于皮瓣分割、缺血预处理和灌注评估的标准化方案仍然缺乏。方法:本研究系统回顾了有关CLFFs和CLCBFs的文献,重点关注分裂时间、调节方法和灌注评估。2025年3月,通过PubMed和EuroPMC检索共确定了38项研究,涉及319名患者。此外,我们报告了一例23岁的男性患者,他用交叉腿背阔肌游离皮瓣重建了25 × 15厘米的胫骨缺损,在皮瓣分割之前,采用吲吲吲胺绿(ICG)血管造影评估灌注。结果:术后3 ~ 6周进行椎弓根分割最为常见。54%的研究报告了缺血性预适应-通常通过间歇性夹紧-。在描述灌注评估的研究中,75%使用临床椎弓根夹紧,而25%使用ICG血管造影。我们的病例展示了ICG成像的成功应用,以确认新生血管和实现安全,早期皮瓣分割无并发症。结论:CLFF和CLCBF技术对肢体保留是有效的,但需要个性化的术后方案。缺血预处理和客观灌注评估,特别是使用ICG血管造影,可以支持更早、更安全的皮瓣分割,最大限度地减少患者的发病率和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信