Half a Century of Public Sector Accounting Research Through Bibliometric Analysis: Looking Back to Move Forward

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mariafrancesca Sicilia, Ileana Steccolini, Sara Giovanna Mauro, Carmela Barbera, Giuseppe Grossi
{"title":"Half a Century of Public Sector Accounting Research Through Bibliometric Analysis: Looking Back to Move Forward","authors":"Mariafrancesca Sicilia,&nbsp;Ileana Steccolini,&nbsp;Sara Giovanna Mauro,&nbsp;Carmela Barbera,&nbsp;Giuseppe Grossi","doi":"10.1111/faam.12432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This literature review aims to highlight the themes and the developments of public sector accounting (PSA) research over the last five decades (1970–2019), analyzing 2187 papers though a combination of bibliometric (co-word) analysis and qualitative insights into the selected papers. The review shows that PSA scholarship has grown in significance over the last few decades giving rise to a vibrant and variegated scientific community, flourishing at the intersection among but also increasingly spanning across, different disciplines. Moreover, it reveals that traditional themes such as budgeting, performance measurement, and accountability remained at the core of the literature across most of the decades, attracting attention from multiple communities and journals. Other themes, such as accruals accounting, accounting standards, reporting, and auditing experienced varied interest over the decades and reflected the interests of more specialized, or “niche” communities of scholarship. By looking at the trends of PSA over time, the paper shows how accounting systems and calculative practices have come to reflect and affect the multiple values and the need for quantifying techniques of an ever-evolving public sector. A call for more attention toward accounting for multiple and plural values is advanced, with suggestions for future research avenues.</p>","PeriodicalId":47120,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accountability & Management","volume":"41 3","pages":"583-601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faam.12432","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accountability & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faam.12432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This literature review aims to highlight the themes and the developments of public sector accounting (PSA) research over the last five decades (1970–2019), analyzing 2187 papers though a combination of bibliometric (co-word) analysis and qualitative insights into the selected papers. The review shows that PSA scholarship has grown in significance over the last few decades giving rise to a vibrant and variegated scientific community, flourishing at the intersection among but also increasingly spanning across, different disciplines. Moreover, it reveals that traditional themes such as budgeting, performance measurement, and accountability remained at the core of the literature across most of the decades, attracting attention from multiple communities and journals. Other themes, such as accruals accounting, accounting standards, reporting, and auditing experienced varied interest over the decades and reflected the interests of more specialized, or “niche” communities of scholarship. By looking at the trends of PSA over time, the paper shows how accounting systems and calculative practices have come to reflect and affect the multiple values and the need for quantifying techniques of an ever-evolving public sector. A call for more attention toward accounting for multiple and plural values is advanced, with suggestions for future research avenues.

Abstract Image

从文献计量学分析看半个世纪的公共部门会计研究:回顾与前进
本文献综述旨在突出过去五十年(1970-2019)公共部门会计(PSA)研究的主题和发展,通过文献计量学(共词)分析和对所选论文的定性见解相结合,分析了2187篇论文。回顾显示,在过去的几十年里,PSA奖学金的重要性不断提高,形成了一个充满活力和多样化的科学社区,在不同学科之间的交叉点蓬勃发展,但也越来越多地跨越不同学科。此外,它还揭示了预算、绩效衡量和问责制等传统主题在过去几十年的大部分时间里仍然是文献的核心,吸引了多个社区和期刊的关注。其他主题,如权责发生制会计、会计准则、报告和审计在过去几十年中经历了不同的兴趣,反映了更专业或“利基”学术社区的兴趣。通过观察PSA随时间的趋势,本文显示了会计系统和计算实践如何反映和影响不断发展的公共部门的多重价值和对量化技术的需求。呼吁更多地关注多重和多元价值的核算,并对未来的研究途径提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信