Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current Decision-Making Process of Invasive Alien Plant Management

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Current Masunungure, Agripa Ngorima, Amanda Manyani, Mwazvita T. B. Dalu, Tatenda Dalu
{"title":"Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current Decision-Making Process of Invasive Alien Plant Management","authors":"Current Masunungure,&nbsp;Agripa Ngorima,&nbsp;Amanda Manyani,&nbsp;Mwazvita T. B. Dalu,&nbsp;Tatenda Dalu","doi":"10.1111/aje.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective management responses to different risks posed by invasive alien plants (IAP) rely on the ability to assess the appropriateness of the decision-making process involved. IAP management is highly dynamic and complex, involving diverse stakeholders and it remains unclear whether the current decision-making processes are appropriate for managing IAP. However, there have been some notable successes both locally and elsewhere in the world. Here, 30 key informant interviews were conducted with private landowners (<i>n</i> = 7), natural resource managers from government parastatals (<i>n</i> = 7), private sector (<i>n</i> = 5), non-governmental organisations (NGO) practitioners (<i>n</i> = 6) and researchers (<i>n</i> = 5) involved in IAP management, to better understand the perspectives on the current decision-making process. In addition, the compliance of the current IAP decision-making process to the principles of robust decision-making was assessed. The availability of a plethora of management plans, science-based decisions, the creation of jobs, flexible process and coordination were frequently identified strengths. Furthermore, the results showed no significant differences among stakeholder groups in how the respondents characterise their current IAP decision-making process, with infrequent mention of the principles of robust decision-making. The findings demonstrate how infrequently the principles of robust decision-making are incorporated into the current IAP decision-making process. Incorporating the principles of robust decision-making offers an avenue for improving the decision-making process for invasive alien plant management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.70075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective management responses to different risks posed by invasive alien plants (IAP) rely on the ability to assess the appropriateness of the decision-making process involved. IAP management is highly dynamic and complex, involving diverse stakeholders and it remains unclear whether the current decision-making processes are appropriate for managing IAP. However, there have been some notable successes both locally and elsewhere in the world. Here, 30 key informant interviews were conducted with private landowners (n = 7), natural resource managers from government parastatals (n = 7), private sector (n = 5), non-governmental organisations (NGO) practitioners (n = 6) and researchers (n = 5) involved in IAP management, to better understand the perspectives on the current decision-making process. In addition, the compliance of the current IAP decision-making process to the principles of robust decision-making was assessed. The availability of a plethora of management plans, science-based decisions, the creation of jobs, flexible process and coordination were frequently identified strengths. Furthermore, the results showed no significant differences among stakeholder groups in how the respondents characterise their current IAP decision-making process, with infrequent mention of the principles of robust decision-making. The findings demonstrate how infrequently the principles of robust decision-making are incorporated into the current IAP decision-making process. Incorporating the principles of robust decision-making offers an avenue for improving the decision-making process for invasive alien plant management.

Abstract Image

外来入侵植物管理决策过程中的利益相关者视角
对外来入侵植物(IAP)带来的不同风险的有效管理反应依赖于评估相关决策过程的适当性的能力。IAP管理是高度动态和复杂的,涉及不同的利益相关者,目前尚不清楚当前的决策过程是否适合管理IAP。然而,在当地和世界其他地方都取得了一些显著的成功。为了更好地了解当前决策过程的观点,我们对30个关键信息提供者进行了访谈,受访者包括私人土地所有者(n = 7)、政府半国有企业的自然资源管理者(n = 7)、私营部门(n = 5)、非政府组织(NGO)从业人员(n = 6)和研究人员(n = 5)。此外,还评估了现行IAP决策过程是否遵守稳健决策原则。提供大量的管理计划、基于科学的决定、创造就业机会、灵活的过程和协调经常被认为是优势。此外,结果显示,在受访者如何描述其当前IAP决策过程方面,利益相关者群体之间没有显著差异,很少提及稳健决策原则。调查结果表明,稳健决策原则很少被纳入当前IAP决策过程。整合稳健决策原则为改进外来入侵植物管理的决策过程提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Ecology
African Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of Ecology (formerly East African Wildlife Journal) publishes original scientific research into the ecology and conservation of the animals and plants of Africa. It has a wide circulation both within and outside Africa and is the foremost research journal on the ecology of the continent. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes comprehensive reviews on topical subjects and brief communications of preliminary results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信