Gerardo Roa-Dabike;Michael A. Akeroyd;Scott Bannister;Jon P. Barker;Trevor J. Cox;Bruno Fazenda;Jennifer Firth;Simone Graetzer;Alinka Greasley;Rebecca R. Vos;William M. Whitmer
{"title":"The First Cadenza Challenges: Using Machine Learning Competitions to Improve Music for Listeners With a Hearing Loss","authors":"Gerardo Roa-Dabike;Michael A. Akeroyd;Scott Bannister;Jon P. Barker;Trevor J. Cox;Bruno Fazenda;Jennifer Firth;Simone Graetzer;Alinka Greasley;Rebecca R. Vos;William M. Whitmer","doi":"10.1109/OJSP.2025.3578299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Listening to music can be an issue for those with a hearing impairment, and hearing aids are not a universal solution. This paper details the first use of an open challenge methodology to improve the audio quality of music for those with hearing loss through machine learning. The first challenge (CAD1) had 9 participants. The second was a 2024 ICASSP grand challenge (ICASSP24), which attracted 17 entrants. The challenge tasks concerned demixing and remixing pop/rock music to allow a personalized rebalancing of the instruments in the mix, along with amplification to correct for raised hearing thresholds. The software baselines provided for entrants to build upon used two state-of-the-art demix algorithms: Hybrid Demucs and Open-Unmix. Objective evaluation used HAAQI, the Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index. No entries improved on the best baseline in CAD1. It is suggested that this arose because demixing algorithms are relatively mature, and recent work has shown that access to large (private) datasets is needed to further improve performance. Learning from this, for ICASSP24 the scenario was made more difficult by using loudspeaker reproduction and specifying gains to be applied before remixing. This also made the scenario more useful for listening through hearing aids. Nine entrants scored better than the best ICASSP24 baseline. Most of the entrants used a refined version of Hybrid Demucs and NAL-R amplification. The highest scoring system combined the outputs of several demixing algorithms in an ensemble approach. These challenges are now open benchmarks for future research with freely available software and data.","PeriodicalId":73300,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of signal processing","volume":"6 ","pages":"722-734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11030066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of signal processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11030066/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Listening to music can be an issue for those with a hearing impairment, and hearing aids are not a universal solution. This paper details the first use of an open challenge methodology to improve the audio quality of music for those with hearing loss through machine learning. The first challenge (CAD1) had 9 participants. The second was a 2024 ICASSP grand challenge (ICASSP24), which attracted 17 entrants. The challenge tasks concerned demixing and remixing pop/rock music to allow a personalized rebalancing of the instruments in the mix, along with amplification to correct for raised hearing thresholds. The software baselines provided for entrants to build upon used two state-of-the-art demix algorithms: Hybrid Demucs and Open-Unmix. Objective evaluation used HAAQI, the Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index. No entries improved on the best baseline in CAD1. It is suggested that this arose because demixing algorithms are relatively mature, and recent work has shown that access to large (private) datasets is needed to further improve performance. Learning from this, for ICASSP24 the scenario was made more difficult by using loudspeaker reproduction and specifying gains to be applied before remixing. This also made the scenario more useful for listening through hearing aids. Nine entrants scored better than the best ICASSP24 baseline. Most of the entrants used a refined version of Hybrid Demucs and NAL-R amplification. The highest scoring system combined the outputs of several demixing algorithms in an ensemble approach. These challenges are now open benchmarks for future research with freely available software and data.