Matthew D. Ramey , Niklas H. Koehne , Auston R. Locke , Jonathan J. Huang , Laurel Wong , Nikan Namiri , Robert L. Parisien
{"title":"Pediatric lower extremity fracture treatments: a statistical review of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Matthew D. Ramey , Niklas H. Koehne , Auston R. Locke , Jonathan J. Huang , Laurel Wong , Nikan Namiri , Robert L. Parisien","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pediatric lower extremity fractures present with significant clinical challenges and largely rely on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for intervention evaluation. The statistical robustness of these trials is seldom evaluated, but when examined reveals issues such as small sample sizes and underpowered results. Therefore, this study aimed to test the statistical robustness of RCTs evaluating pediatric lower extremity fracture interventions using fragility statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched for recent RCTs (2000–2023) assessing outcomes for pediatric patients with lower extremity fractures. The fragility index (FI), or number of event reversals required to alter statistical significance, was calculated for all dichotomous outcomes. The fragility quotient (FQ) was then determined by dividing the FI by the study sample size.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening, 14 studies were included for analysis. Across 83 total dichotomous outcomes, the median FI was 5 (IQR 3–6) with an associated median FQ of 0.070 (IQR 0.033–0.107), suggesting that just event reversal in 5 patients, or 7.0 % of the study population, would alter significance for 50 % of outcomes. 15 outcomes were statistically significant (FQ = 0.029), and 68 outcomes were non-significant (FQ = 0.083). Outcomes were grouped into three categories, including fracture reduction or union (28 outcomes), functional improvement and patient satisfaction (26 outcomes), and adverse events (29 outcomes). Category FQs were 0.061, 0.069, and 0.076, respectively. 47 outcomes were extracted from studies published prior to 2018 (FQ = 0.086), while the 36 outcomes published in 2018 or later resulted in a median FQ of 0.048. Three fracture types were assessed, including tibia (37 outcomes), femur (39 outcomes), and ankle (7 outcomes) fractures, with FQs of 0.075, 0.060, and 0.050, respectively. Across the 59 outcomes from studies with operative interventions, the FQ was 0.075, whereas the 24 outcomes from studies with non-operative interventions reported a FQ of 0.060.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The efficacy of treatments in pediatric lower extremity fractures from RCTs are slightly fragile, particularly among significant outcomes. Over time, these studies have become less robust. Larger RCTs that combine the reporting of p-values with FI and FQ metrics may provide more robust evidence for guiding effective treatment strategies in pediatric lower extremity fractures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Pages 329-335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Pediatric lower extremity fractures present with significant clinical challenges and largely rely on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for intervention evaluation. The statistical robustness of these trials is seldom evaluated, but when examined reveals issues such as small sample sizes and underpowered results. Therefore, this study aimed to test the statistical robustness of RCTs evaluating pediatric lower extremity fracture interventions using fragility statistics.
Methods
PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched for recent RCTs (2000–2023) assessing outcomes for pediatric patients with lower extremity fractures. The fragility index (FI), or number of event reversals required to alter statistical significance, was calculated for all dichotomous outcomes. The fragility quotient (FQ) was then determined by dividing the FI by the study sample size.
Results
After screening, 14 studies were included for analysis. Across 83 total dichotomous outcomes, the median FI was 5 (IQR 3–6) with an associated median FQ of 0.070 (IQR 0.033–0.107), suggesting that just event reversal in 5 patients, or 7.0 % of the study population, would alter significance for 50 % of outcomes. 15 outcomes were statistically significant (FQ = 0.029), and 68 outcomes were non-significant (FQ = 0.083). Outcomes were grouped into three categories, including fracture reduction or union (28 outcomes), functional improvement and patient satisfaction (26 outcomes), and adverse events (29 outcomes). Category FQs were 0.061, 0.069, and 0.076, respectively. 47 outcomes were extracted from studies published prior to 2018 (FQ = 0.086), while the 36 outcomes published in 2018 or later resulted in a median FQ of 0.048. Three fracture types were assessed, including tibia (37 outcomes), femur (39 outcomes), and ankle (7 outcomes) fractures, with FQs of 0.075, 0.060, and 0.050, respectively. Across the 59 outcomes from studies with operative interventions, the FQ was 0.075, whereas the 24 outcomes from studies with non-operative interventions reported a FQ of 0.060.
Conclusion
The efficacy of treatments in pediatric lower extremity fractures from RCTs are slightly fragile, particularly among significant outcomes. Over time, these studies have become less robust. Larger RCTs that combine the reporting of p-values with FI and FQ metrics may provide more robust evidence for guiding effective treatment strategies in pediatric lower extremity fractures.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.