Evaluating public bicycle sharing system in Ahmedabad, Gujarat: A multi-criteria decision-making approach

T.S. Shagufta , Dimpu Byalal Chindappa , Seelam Srikanth , Subhashish Dey
{"title":"Evaluating public bicycle sharing system in Ahmedabad, Gujarat: A multi-criteria decision-making approach","authors":"T.S. Shagufta ,&nbsp;Dimpu Byalal Chindappa ,&nbsp;Seelam Srikanth ,&nbsp;Subhashish Dey","doi":"10.1016/j.tbench.2025.100220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the existing Public Bicycle Sharing System (PBSS) at Ahmedabad, Gujarat by applying four decision-making methods such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy AHP, Analytic Network Process (ANP), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The study aims to identify the most effective strategies for improving PBSS, focusing on safety, infrastructure, user convenience, and environmental impact. The analysis shows that Enhanced Non-Motorized Transport (NMT) Infrastructure and Expansion of Bicycle Networks are the preferred alternatives across all methods. Personal safety and safe cycling infrastructure are identified as critical factors influencing the success of PBSS. Socio-demographic data reveals a male-dominant user base, with financial barriers and safety concerns limiting broader adoption. Positive perceptions of cycle design are noted, though electric and hybrid cycles are preferred due to climatic conditions. Monthly variations in ridership demonstrate significant fluctuations, peaking at 68,529 rides in March, underscoring the need for targeted interventions during peak periods. The study provides a robust framework for transport planners, emphasizing safety, inclusivity, and affordability. Future research should focus on expanding electric cycle options and enhancing gender inclusivity in PBSS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100155,"journal":{"name":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277248592500033X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the existing Public Bicycle Sharing System (PBSS) at Ahmedabad, Gujarat by applying four decision-making methods such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy AHP, Analytic Network Process (ANP), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The study aims to identify the most effective strategies for improving PBSS, focusing on safety, infrastructure, user convenience, and environmental impact. The analysis shows that Enhanced Non-Motorized Transport (NMT) Infrastructure and Expansion of Bicycle Networks are the preferred alternatives across all methods. Personal safety and safe cycling infrastructure are identified as critical factors influencing the success of PBSS. Socio-demographic data reveals a male-dominant user base, with financial barriers and safety concerns limiting broader adoption. Positive perceptions of cycle design are noted, though electric and hybrid cycles are preferred due to climatic conditions. Monthly variations in ridership demonstrate significant fluctuations, peaking at 68,529 rides in March, underscoring the need for targeted interventions during peak periods. The study provides a robust framework for transport planners, emphasizing safety, inclusivity, and affordability. Future research should focus on expanding electric cycle options and enhancing gender inclusivity in PBSS.

Abstract Image

古吉拉特邦艾哈迈达巴德市公共自行车共享系统评估:多标准决策方法
本文采用层次分析法(AHP)、模糊层次分析法(Fuzzy AHP)、网络分析法(ANP)和TOPSIS法(Order Preference Technique by Similarity to Ideal Solution)四种决策方法,对古吉拉特邦艾哈迈达巴德市现有公共自行车共享系统(PBSS)进行了评价。该研究旨在确定改善PBSS的最有效策略,重点关注安全性、基础设施、用户便利性和环境影响。分析表明,加强非机动交通(NMT)基础设施和扩大自行车网络是所有方法的首选选择。人身安全和安全骑行基础设施是影响PBSS成功的关键因素。社会人口统计数据显示,男性用户占主导地位,经济障碍和安全问题限制了更广泛的采用。注意到对循环设计的积极看法,尽管由于气候条件,电动和混合动力循环是首选。乘车人数的月度变化显示出很大的波动,3月份达到68,529人次的峰值,强调需要在高峰期间进行有针对性的干预。该研究为交通规划者提供了一个强有力的框架,强调了安全性、包容性和可负担性。未来的研究应侧重于扩大电动自行车选择和增强PBSS的性别包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信