{"title":"Evaluating public bicycle sharing system in Ahmedabad, Gujarat: A multi-criteria decision-making approach","authors":"T.S. Shagufta , Dimpu Byalal Chindappa , Seelam Srikanth , Subhashish Dey","doi":"10.1016/j.tbench.2025.100220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the existing Public Bicycle Sharing System (PBSS) at Ahmedabad, Gujarat by applying four decision-making methods such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy AHP, Analytic Network Process (ANP), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The study aims to identify the most effective strategies for improving PBSS, focusing on safety, infrastructure, user convenience, and environmental impact. The analysis shows that Enhanced Non-Motorized Transport (NMT) Infrastructure and Expansion of Bicycle Networks are the preferred alternatives across all methods. Personal safety and safe cycling infrastructure are identified as critical factors influencing the success of PBSS. Socio-demographic data reveals a male-dominant user base, with financial barriers and safety concerns limiting broader adoption. Positive perceptions of cycle design are noted, though electric and hybrid cycles are preferred due to climatic conditions. Monthly variations in ridership demonstrate significant fluctuations, peaking at 68,529 rides in March, underscoring the need for targeted interventions during peak periods. The study provides a robust framework for transport planners, emphasizing safety, inclusivity, and affordability. Future research should focus on expanding electric cycle options and enhancing gender inclusivity in PBSS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100155,"journal":{"name":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277248592500033X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the existing Public Bicycle Sharing System (PBSS) at Ahmedabad, Gujarat by applying four decision-making methods such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy AHP, Analytic Network Process (ANP), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The study aims to identify the most effective strategies for improving PBSS, focusing on safety, infrastructure, user convenience, and environmental impact. The analysis shows that Enhanced Non-Motorized Transport (NMT) Infrastructure and Expansion of Bicycle Networks are the preferred alternatives across all methods. Personal safety and safe cycling infrastructure are identified as critical factors influencing the success of PBSS. Socio-demographic data reveals a male-dominant user base, with financial barriers and safety concerns limiting broader adoption. Positive perceptions of cycle design are noted, though electric and hybrid cycles are preferred due to climatic conditions. Monthly variations in ridership demonstrate significant fluctuations, peaking at 68,529 rides in March, underscoring the need for targeted interventions during peak periods. The study provides a robust framework for transport planners, emphasizing safety, inclusivity, and affordability. Future research should focus on expanding electric cycle options and enhancing gender inclusivity in PBSS.
本文采用层次分析法(AHP)、模糊层次分析法(Fuzzy AHP)、网络分析法(ANP)和TOPSIS法(Order Preference Technique by Similarity to Ideal Solution)四种决策方法,对古吉拉特邦艾哈迈达巴德市现有公共自行车共享系统(PBSS)进行了评价。该研究旨在确定改善PBSS的最有效策略,重点关注安全性、基础设施、用户便利性和环境影响。分析表明,加强非机动交通(NMT)基础设施和扩大自行车网络是所有方法的首选选择。人身安全和安全骑行基础设施是影响PBSS成功的关键因素。社会人口统计数据显示,男性用户占主导地位,经济障碍和安全问题限制了更广泛的采用。注意到对循环设计的积极看法,尽管由于气候条件,电动和混合动力循环是首选。乘车人数的月度变化显示出很大的波动,3月份达到68,529人次的峰值,强调需要在高峰期间进行有针对性的干预。该研究为交通规划者提供了一个强有力的框架,强调了安全性、包容性和可负担性。未来的研究应侧重于扩大电动自行车选择和增强PBSS的性别包容性。