Ulrich R. Orth , Jule Timm , Anna-Lena Sager , Stephanie Tischler , Roberta Crouch
{"title":"Linking biodiversity perception with restorativeness: Mechanism and moderators","authors":"Ulrich R. Orth , Jule Timm , Anna-Lena Sager , Stephanie Tischler , Roberta Crouch","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study contributes to research on the restorative capacity of contact with nature by investigating a novel process mechanism, including important boundary conditions, and by linking restorativeness with behavioral intentions relevant to businesses. We develop and test a conditional process model where people's momentary feelings of being one with nature (state nature connectedness) mediate effects of perception of biodiversity on restorativeness, in turn, stimulating behavioral intentions (to visit the place, to purchase products from there and to engage in positive word-of-mouth). This novel mechanism was tested against two boundary conditions: an individual's frequency of exposure to nature and their need-for-deceleration. Results from three studies (N<sub>1</sub> = 71; N<sub>2</sub> = 258; N<sub>3</sub> = 301) strongly support the mediating role of state connectedness with nature on restorativeness with positive downstream effects on behavioral intention. While we found no moderating effect of frequency of nature exposure on the relationship between perceived biodiversity and state nature connectedness, the relationship between connectedness and restorativeness gets weaker as levels of a need-for-deceleration increased. Including an alternative process explanation through aesthetics along with a number of control variables attests to the mechanism's robustness. Implications center on the power of perceptions of higher biodiversity to work through a heightened feeling of connectedness with nature, in turn improving restorativeness and stimulating behavioral intentions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102671"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001549","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study contributes to research on the restorative capacity of contact with nature by investigating a novel process mechanism, including important boundary conditions, and by linking restorativeness with behavioral intentions relevant to businesses. We develop and test a conditional process model where people's momentary feelings of being one with nature (state nature connectedness) mediate effects of perception of biodiversity on restorativeness, in turn, stimulating behavioral intentions (to visit the place, to purchase products from there and to engage in positive word-of-mouth). This novel mechanism was tested against two boundary conditions: an individual's frequency of exposure to nature and their need-for-deceleration. Results from three studies (N1 = 71; N2 = 258; N3 = 301) strongly support the mediating role of state connectedness with nature on restorativeness with positive downstream effects on behavioral intention. While we found no moderating effect of frequency of nature exposure on the relationship between perceived biodiversity and state nature connectedness, the relationship between connectedness and restorativeness gets weaker as levels of a need-for-deceleration increased. Including an alternative process explanation through aesthetics along with a number of control variables attests to the mechanism's robustness. Implications center on the power of perceptions of higher biodiversity to work through a heightened feeling of connectedness with nature, in turn improving restorativeness and stimulating behavioral intentions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space