Artificial Intelligence in Digital Self-Diagnosis Tools: A Narrative Overview of Reviews

Aikaterini Mentzou PhD , Amy Rogers MD , Edzia Carvalho PhD , Angela Daly PhD , Maeve Malone HDip , Xaroula Kerasidou PhD
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Digital Self-Diagnosis Tools: A Narrative Overview of Reviews","authors":"Aikaterini Mentzou PhD ,&nbsp;Amy Rogers MD ,&nbsp;Edzia Carvalho PhD ,&nbsp;Angela Daly PhD ,&nbsp;Maeve Malone HDip ,&nbsp;Xaroula Kerasidou PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital self-diagnosis tools, or symptom checkers, many of which incorporate artificial intelligence technology, are intended to provide diagnostic information and triage advice to lay users. This narrative overview of reviews explores the common themes and issues raised by existing evidence synthesis literature on these tools to establish a common ground for interdisciplinary research. We searched 3 bibliographic databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) and Google Scholar using keyword combinations of <em>artificial</em>, <em>self-diagnosis</em>, <em>intelligence</em>, and <em>machine learning</em> for publications from 2019 to 2023. We included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, narrative syntheses, and opinion pieces that discussed tools where users proactively entered personal health information to acquire a predicted diagnosis of their symptoms or triage advice. This overview reveals significant gaps in understanding the key areas of development, implementation, impact, and oversight of digital self-diagnosis tools. Additionally, the terminology used to describe these tools and their underlying technologies varies widely, encompassing technologies ranging from simple branching logic algorithms to complex deep neural networks. Our interdisciplinary analysis identified gaps and critical areas for future research across all stages of the lifecycles of these tools. The diverse challenges uncovered highlight the necessity for multiagency and multidisciplinary efforts promoting responsible development and implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761225000495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital self-diagnosis tools, or symptom checkers, many of which incorporate artificial intelligence technology, are intended to provide diagnostic information and triage advice to lay users. This narrative overview of reviews explores the common themes and issues raised by existing evidence synthesis literature on these tools to establish a common ground for interdisciplinary research. We searched 3 bibliographic databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) and Google Scholar using keyword combinations of artificial, self-diagnosis, intelligence, and machine learning for publications from 2019 to 2023. We included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, narrative syntheses, and opinion pieces that discussed tools where users proactively entered personal health information to acquire a predicted diagnosis of their symptoms or triage advice. This overview reveals significant gaps in understanding the key areas of development, implementation, impact, and oversight of digital self-diagnosis tools. Additionally, the terminology used to describe these tools and their underlying technologies varies widely, encompassing technologies ranging from simple branching logic algorithms to complex deep neural networks. Our interdisciplinary analysis identified gaps and critical areas for future research across all stages of the lifecycles of these tools. The diverse challenges uncovered highlight the necessity for multiagency and multidisciplinary efforts promoting responsible development and implementation.
数字自我诊断工具中的人工智能:综述
数字自我诊断工具或症状检查器,其中许多都结合了人工智能技术,旨在为非专业用户提供诊断信息和分类建议。本综述探讨了现有证据综合文献中关于这些工具提出的共同主题和问题,以建立跨学科研究的共同基础。我们检索了3个书目数据库(PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)和谷歌Scholar,使用人工、自我诊断、智能和机器学习的关键字组合检索了2019年至2023年的出版物。我们纳入了系统评价、荟萃分析、范围评价、叙述综合和意见片段,讨论了用户主动输入个人健康信息以获得对其症状的预测诊断或分诊建议的工具。这一概述揭示了在理解数字自我诊断工具的开发、实施、影响和监督的关键领域方面的重大差距。此外,用于描述这些工具及其底层技术的术语差异很大,包括从简单的分支逻辑算法到复杂的深度神经网络等技术。我们的跨学科分析确定了这些工具生命周期所有阶段的差距和未来研究的关键领域。所发现的各种挑战突出了多机构和多学科努力促进负责任的发展和执行的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信