Psychosocial considerations in pediatric heart transplantation: Initial validation of the Pediatric Psychosocial Assessment Tool at a single center

Michael O. Killian PhD, MSW , Sonnie E. Mayewski MSW , Schyler E. Brumm MSW , Zhe He PhD , Dipankar Gupta MBBS, DCH, MD
{"title":"Psychosocial considerations in pediatric heart transplantation: Initial validation of the Pediatric Psychosocial Assessment Tool at a single center","authors":"Michael O. Killian PhD, MSW ,&nbsp;Sonnie E. Mayewski MSW ,&nbsp;Schyler E. Brumm MSW ,&nbsp;Zhe He PhD ,&nbsp;Dipankar Gupta MBBS, DCH, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pre-transplant psychosocial assessment, in conjunction with medical and surgical evaluation, is a critical component of determining pediatric heart transplant candidacy. Psychosocial factors such as family dynamics, health literacy, mental health, financial stability, and adherence potential are often multidimensional and interdependent, making their assessment both vital and complex. However, few standardized tools exist to guide these evaluations in pediatric heart transplant settings, and even fewer have demonstrated empirical validity or predictive value. To address this gap, the Pediatric Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PPAT) was developed to provide a structured, semi-quantitative framework for evaluating psychosocial risk in pediatric transplant candidates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study presents initial validation data for the PPAT, based on 189 assessments conducted at a large pediatric heart transplant center. The tool evaluates nine psychosocial domains, assigns risk ratings, and yields a total risk score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the tool, and internal consistency was strong (α = 0.89). Higher PPAT scores were significantly associated with lower odds of being listed for transplant by the center’s multidisciplinary medical review board (MRB), even after accounting for clinical factors. Domain-level findings revealed financial and health literacy issues as commonly identified risk areas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PPAT holds promise as a valid, reliable, and clinically useful instrument for guiding MRB discussions and targeting interventions to support high-risk families. Future directions include expanding implementation to other centers and integrating the PPAT into digital platforms using artificial intelligence and natural language processing to enhance efficiency, consistency, and patient-centered care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425001144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pre-transplant psychosocial assessment, in conjunction with medical and surgical evaluation, is a critical component of determining pediatric heart transplant candidacy. Psychosocial factors such as family dynamics, health literacy, mental health, financial stability, and adherence potential are often multidimensional and interdependent, making their assessment both vital and complex. However, few standardized tools exist to guide these evaluations in pediatric heart transplant settings, and even fewer have demonstrated empirical validity or predictive value. To address this gap, the Pediatric Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PPAT) was developed to provide a structured, semi-quantitative framework for evaluating psychosocial risk in pediatric transplant candidates.

Methods

This study presents initial validation data for the PPAT, based on 189 assessments conducted at a large pediatric heart transplant center. The tool evaluates nine psychosocial domains, assigns risk ratings, and yields a total risk score.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the tool, and internal consistency was strong (α = 0.89). Higher PPAT scores were significantly associated with lower odds of being listed for transplant by the center’s multidisciplinary medical review board (MRB), even after accounting for clinical factors. Domain-level findings revealed financial and health literacy issues as commonly identified risk areas.

Conclusion

The PPAT holds promise as a valid, reliable, and clinically useful instrument for guiding MRB discussions and targeting interventions to support high-risk families. Future directions include expanding implementation to other centers and integrating the PPAT into digital platforms using artificial intelligence and natural language processing to enhance efficiency, consistency, and patient-centered care.
儿童心脏移植中的社会心理因素:单中心儿童社会心理评估工具的初步验证
背景:移植前心理社会评估,结合内科和外科评估,是确定儿童心脏移植候选资格的关键组成部分。家庭动态、卫生知识普及、心理健康、财务稳定和坚持治疗潜力等社会心理因素往往是多层面和相互依存的,因此对这些因素的评估既重要又复杂。然而,很少有标准化的工具存在,以指导这些评估在儿童心脏移植设置,甚至更少已经证明了经验有效性或预测价值。为了解决这一差距,开发了儿科社会心理评估工具(PPAT),为评估儿科移植候选人的社会心理风险提供了一个结构化的半定量框架。本研究基于一家大型儿童心脏移植中心进行的189项评估,提出了PPAT的初步验证数据。该工具评估九个社会心理领域,分配风险等级,并产生总风险评分。结果验证性因子分析支持工具的一维结构,内部一致性强(α = 0.89)。即使在考虑了临床因素后,较高的PPAT分数与较低的被中心多学科医学审查委员会(MRB)列入移植名单的几率显著相关。领域层面的调查结果显示,金融和卫生知识普及问题是普遍确定的风险领域。结论PPAT有望成为指导MRB讨论和靶向干预以支持高危家庭的有效、可靠和临床有用的工具。未来的方向包括扩展到其他中心的实施,并使用人工智能和自然语言处理将PPAT集成到数字平台中,以提高效率、一致性和以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信