Multidimensional Pancreatic Islet β-cell Function (PIF) Assessment Improves Predictive Effect of Diabetes Risk Scores.

IF 5.1
Qi Fu, Hao Dai, Jiachen Wang, Lei Liu, Lilian Fernandes Silva, Hemin Jiang, Yu Qian, Zhenzhen Fu, Ruyi Peng, Zhijie Xia, Xiaomeng Chu, Markku Laakso, Xianyong Yin, Tao Yang
{"title":"Multidimensional Pancreatic Islet β-cell Function (PIF) Assessment Improves Predictive Effect of Diabetes Risk Scores.","authors":"Qi Fu, Hao Dai, Jiachen Wang, Lei Liu, Lilian Fernandes Silva, Hemin Jiang, Yu Qian, Zhenzhen Fu, Ruyi Peng, Zhijie Xia, Xiaomeng Chu, Markku Laakso, Xianyong Yin, Tao Yang","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>Comprehensive assessment of pancreatic islet β-cell function (PIF) is crucial for diabetes management. We proposed a multidimensional, relative quantification system for PIF measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our novel approach evaluates PIF using three dimensions: stationary-baseline (PIF-S), load-peak (PIF-L), and accelerated-slope (PIF-A). The system was evaluated in 814 JR Cohort volunteers (195 metabolically healthy, 619 abnormal), 12 Botnia clamp study participants, 3394 type 2 diabetes patients, and 6345 METSIM cohort study participants. Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) modeling determined ideal values based on human physiological parameters. Each subject's actual values were compared with predicted ideals and converted into percentile indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Botnia clamp experiment confirmed distinct meaning of three PIF indices. Cluster analysis in metabolically abnormal individuals identified three clusters. Cluster 1, with the highest PIF-A, had the best metabolic profiles and lowest cardiovascular and renal disease risks. Cluster 3, with the highest PIF-S and PIF-L but lowest PIF-A, had the poorest metabolic profiles and highest disease risks. Type 2 diabetes patients with high PIF-S and PIF-L were more prone to complications. Similar patterns were observed in the METSIM cohort, Cluster 1 showing the lowest diabetes risk, with hazard ratios for Clusters 2 and 3 at 2.499 (95% CI 1.932-3.233, P = 3.11E-12) and 3.185 (95% CI 2.353-4.311, P = 6.35E-12), respectively. The novel three-dimensional PIF indices surpass previous indicators in predicting diabetes. Combined with existing diabetes risk scores, novel PIFs also significantly improved their predictive efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel system offers an effective method for PIF assessment, enhancing diabetes prediction and management by deepening the understanding of diabetes complexity and aiding in precise therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Comprehensive assessment of pancreatic islet β-cell function (PIF) is crucial for diabetes management. We proposed a multidimensional, relative quantification system for PIF measurement.

Methods: Our novel approach evaluates PIF using three dimensions: stationary-baseline (PIF-S), load-peak (PIF-L), and accelerated-slope (PIF-A). The system was evaluated in 814 JR Cohort volunteers (195 metabolically healthy, 619 abnormal), 12 Botnia clamp study participants, 3394 type 2 diabetes patients, and 6345 METSIM cohort study participants. Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) modeling determined ideal values based on human physiological parameters. Each subject's actual values were compared with predicted ideals and converted into percentile indices.

Results: The Botnia clamp experiment confirmed distinct meaning of three PIF indices. Cluster analysis in metabolically abnormal individuals identified three clusters. Cluster 1, with the highest PIF-A, had the best metabolic profiles and lowest cardiovascular and renal disease risks. Cluster 3, with the highest PIF-S and PIF-L but lowest PIF-A, had the poorest metabolic profiles and highest disease risks. Type 2 diabetes patients with high PIF-S and PIF-L were more prone to complications. Similar patterns were observed in the METSIM cohort, Cluster 1 showing the lowest diabetes risk, with hazard ratios for Clusters 2 and 3 at 2.499 (95% CI 1.932-3.233, P = 3.11E-12) and 3.185 (95% CI 2.353-4.311, P = 6.35E-12), respectively. The novel three-dimensional PIF indices surpass previous indicators in predicting diabetes. Combined with existing diabetes risk scores, novel PIFs also significantly improved their predictive efficiency.

Conclusions: This novel system offers an effective method for PIF assessment, enhancing diabetes prediction and management by deepening the understanding of diabetes complexity and aiding in precise therapy.

多维胰岛β-细胞功能(PIF)评估提高糖尿病风险评分的预测效果。
目的/假设:全面评估胰岛β细胞功能(PIF)对糖尿病治疗至关重要。我们提出了一个多维的、相对量化的PIF测量系统。方法:我们的新方法使用三个维度来评估PIF:平稳基线(PIF- s),负载峰值(PIF- l)和加速斜率(PIF- a)。该系统在814名JR队列志愿者(195名代谢健康,619名代谢异常)、12名博特尼亚钳研究参与者、3394名2型糖尿病患者和6345名METSIM队列研究参与者中进行了评估。限制三次样条(RCS)建模根据人体生理参数确定理想值。每个受试者的实际值与预测理想值进行比较,并转化为百分位数指数。结果:Botnia钳形实验证实了PIF三个指标的不同意义。代谢异常个体的聚类分析确定了三个聚类。PIF-A最高的第1组具有最佳的代谢特征和最低的心血管和肾脏疾病风险。聚类3具有最高的PIF-S和PIF-L,但最低的PIF-A,具有最差的代谢谱和最高的疾病风险。高PIF-S和高PIF-L的2型糖尿病患者更容易出现并发症。在METSIM队列中也观察到类似的模式,聚类1的糖尿病风险最低,聚类2和聚类3的风险比分别为2.499 (95% CI 1.932-3.233, P = 3.11E-12)和3.185 (95% CI 2.353-4.311, P = 6.35E-12)。新的三维PIF指标在预测糖尿病方面超越了以往的指标。结合现有的糖尿病风险评分,新的pif也显著提高了其预测效率。结论:该系统通过加深对糖尿病复杂性的认识和帮助精准治疗,为PIF评估、糖尿病预测和管理提供了有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信