Myocardium-to-cavity ratio derived from simultaneous 99mTc-PYP/201Tl dual-isotope SPECT imaging to differentially diagnose transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.

Shozo Yamashita, Kenichi Nakajima, Teppei Kitano, Hiromu Kato, Tatsuya Yoneyama, Haruki Yamamoto, Kunihiko Yokoyama
{"title":"Myocardium-to-cavity ratio derived from simultaneous <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP/<sup>201</sup>Tl dual-isotope SPECT imaging to differentially diagnose transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.","authors":"Shozo Yamashita, Kenichi Nakajima, Teppei Kitano, Hiromu Kato, Tatsuya Yoneyama, Haruki Yamamoto, Kunihiko Yokoyama","doi":"10.1186/s41824-025-00255-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heart-to-contralateral lung (H/CL) ratio, derived from planar imaging, is a standard quantitative metric in <sup>99m</sup>Tc-pyrophosphate (<sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP) studies. However, cardiac-dedicated cadmium-zinc-telluride cameras, which primarily generate single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images, cannot produce planar images. We propose the myocardium-to-cavity (M/C) ratio, derived from simultaneous dual-isotope <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP/<sup>201</sup>Tl SPECT imaging, as an alternative quantitative measure. This study evaluates the clinical utility of the M/C ratio by comparing it to the H/CL ratio.</p><p><strong>Methods/results: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 121 consecutive patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis who underwent dual-isotope <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP/<sup>201</sup>Tl imaging. Anterior planar images were acquired using an Anger camera at 1 h after <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP injection. Dual-isotope D-SPECT <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP/<sup>201</sup>Tl images were acquired from 10 min after <sup>201</sup>Tl injection at 1 and/or 3 h after <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP injection. For M/C ratio calculation, circular regions of interest of equal diameter were set on the myocardium and left ventricular cavity using <sup>201</sup>Tl images, then superimposed on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP images. The optimal cut-off values were 1.5 for H/CL and 1.0 for M/C ratios to distinguish <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP positive and negative uptake. Of 121 patients, 19 (16%) were classified as <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP positive with planar and SPECT imaging, following the stepwise diagnostic flow recommended by the Japanese Society of Nuclear Cardiology (adapted for D-SPECT). Both H/CL and M/C ratios were significantly higher in patients with <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP-positive than in negative cases. Notably, five false-positive cases with H/CL ratios > 1.5 had M/C ratio < 1.0, correctly distinguishing them from <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP-positive patients. The M/C ratio demonstrated 100% sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, irrespective of imaging time. In contrast, the H/CL ratios showed 100% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 79% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. The inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the M/C ratio was excellent with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.99. Additionally, 13 of the 19 (68%) <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP positive patients exhibited a mismatch pattern with decreased <sup>201</sup>Tl uptake corresponding to high <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The M/C ratio demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to the H/CL ratio, particularly in eliminating false positive cases. Its simplicity and reproducibility make it a promising alternative for routine clinical practice, potentially replacing the H/CL ratio in dual-isotope imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":519909,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI reports","volume":"9 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-025-00255-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The heart-to-contralateral lung (H/CL) ratio, derived from planar imaging, is a standard quantitative metric in 99mTc-pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) studies. However, cardiac-dedicated cadmium-zinc-telluride cameras, which primarily generate single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images, cannot produce planar images. We propose the myocardium-to-cavity (M/C) ratio, derived from simultaneous dual-isotope 99mTc-PYP/201Tl SPECT imaging, as an alternative quantitative measure. This study evaluates the clinical utility of the M/C ratio by comparing it to the H/CL ratio.

Methods/results: We retrospectively analyzed 121 consecutive patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis who underwent dual-isotope 99mTc-PYP/201Tl imaging. Anterior planar images were acquired using an Anger camera at 1 h after 99mTc-PYP injection. Dual-isotope D-SPECT 99mTc-PYP/201Tl images were acquired from 10 min after 201Tl injection at 1 and/or 3 h after 99mTc-PYP injection. For M/C ratio calculation, circular regions of interest of equal diameter were set on the myocardium and left ventricular cavity using 201Tl images, then superimposed on 99mTc-PYP images. The optimal cut-off values were 1.5 for H/CL and 1.0 for M/C ratios to distinguish 99mTc-PYP positive and negative uptake. Of 121 patients, 19 (16%) were classified as 99mTc-PYP positive with planar and SPECT imaging, following the stepwise diagnostic flow recommended by the Japanese Society of Nuclear Cardiology (adapted for D-SPECT). Both H/CL and M/C ratios were significantly higher in patients with 99mTc-PYP-positive than in negative cases. Notably, five false-positive cases with H/CL ratios > 1.5 had M/C ratio < 1.0, correctly distinguishing them from 99mTc-PYP-positive patients. The M/C ratio demonstrated 100% sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, irrespective of imaging time. In contrast, the H/CL ratios showed 100% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 79% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. The inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the M/C ratio was excellent with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.99. Additionally, 13 of the 19 (68%) 99mTc-PYP positive patients exhibited a mismatch pattern with decreased 201Tl uptake corresponding to high 99mTc-PYP uptake.

Conclusions: The M/C ratio demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to the H/CL ratio, particularly in eliminating false positive cases. Its simplicity and reproducibility make it a promising alternative for routine clinical practice, potentially replacing the H/CL ratio in dual-isotope imaging.

99mTc-PYP/201Tl双同位素SPECT同时显像获得的心肌腔比鉴别甲状腺素型心脏淀粉样变性
背景:心脏与对侧肺(H/CL)比,来源于平面成像,是99mtc焦磷酸盐(99mTc-PYP)研究中的标准定量指标。然而,心脏专用的镉锌碲化照相机,主要产生单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)图像,不能产生平面图像。我们提出同时采用双同位素99mTc-PYP/201Tl SPECT成像的心肌-腔(M/C)比率作为替代的定量测量方法。本研究通过比较M/C比和H/CL比来评估M/C比的临床应用。方法/结果:我们回顾性分析了121例连续接受99mTc-PYP/201Tl双同位素成像的疑似心脏淀粉样变性患者。注射99mTc-PYP后1小时,使用Anger相机获得前平面图像。双同位素D-SPECT 99mTc-PYP/201Tl图像在注射201Tl后10分钟,99mTc-PYP注射后1和/或3小时获得。为了计算M/C比值,我们使用201Tl图像在心肌和左室腔上设置等直径的圆形感兴趣区域,然后叠加到99mTc-PYP图像上。区分99mTc-PYP阳性和阴性吸收的最佳临界值分别为H/CL 1.5和M/C 1.0。121例患者中,19例(16%)在平面和SPECT成像中被分类为99mTc-PYP阳性,遵循日本核心脏病学会推荐的分步诊断流程(适用于D-SPECT)。99mtc - pypp阳性患者的H/CL和M/C比值均显著高于阴性患者。值得注意的是,5例H/CL比值为bbbb1.5的假阳性患者的M/C比值为99mtc - pypp阳性。无论成像时间如何,M/C比值均显示出100%的敏感性、特异性和预测值。相比之下,H/CL比值的敏感性为100%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值为79%,阴性预测值为100%。M/C比值在观察者间和观察者内的重复性很好,相关系数超过0.99。此外,19例99mTc-PYP阳性患者中有13例(68%)表现出不匹配模式,201Tl摄取减少与99mTc-PYP摄取高相对应。结论:与H/CL比相比,M/C比表现出更高的诊断准确性,特别是在排除假阳性病例方面。它的简单性和可重复性使其成为常规临床实践的有希望的替代方案,有可能取代双同位素成像中的H/CL比值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信