Dana M Johnson, Terri-Ann Thompson, Fiona Scovack, Melissa Grant
{"title":"Characteristics of people obtaining mifepristone and misoprostol and misoprostol-only telehealth medication abortion services in the United States.","authors":"Dana M Johnson, Terri-Ann Thompson, Fiona Scovack, Melissa Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares the characteristics of people using mifepristone/misoprostol, and misoprostol-only telehealth medication abortion regimens in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We abstracted and analyzed characteristics for all clients using a virtual clinic between April 27, 2020, and May 31, 2022. We compare sociodemographic characteristics between clients who used either mifepristone and misoprostol, or misoprostol-only. We conducted multivariable analyses to identify characteristics associated with using each regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 8,790 clients: 84% used mifepristone and misoprostol, and 16% used misoprostol-only. Most clients (54%) were aged 26-35. Characteristics of having fewer years of education, living in the Mid-Atlantic or Midwest, and reporting a lower income were positively associated with using misoprostol-only. Characteristics of identifying as white or a race other than Black or white, as well as having higher levels of education and reporting a higher income, were positively associated with using mifepristone/misoprostol. Although not directly tested, associated characteristics indicate that a difference in regimen price may have influenced regimen use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings demonstrate the range of people who have telehealth medication abortions and suggest some differences between clients who used mifepristone/misoprostol and clients who used misoprostol-only.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>As mifepristone continues to be restricted and telehealth abortions are a growing share of the medication abortions provided in the US, these findings inform service delivery for clinics considering expanding into telehealth to provide misoprostol-only regimens. Findings also inform expanding policies aimed at the affordability of services, including expanding coverage from private, public, and Medicaid insurance programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"111001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study compares the characteristics of people using mifepristone/misoprostol, and misoprostol-only telehealth medication abortion regimens in the United States (US).
Study design: We abstracted and analyzed characteristics for all clients using a virtual clinic between April 27, 2020, and May 31, 2022. We compare sociodemographic characteristics between clients who used either mifepristone and misoprostol, or misoprostol-only. We conducted multivariable analyses to identify characteristics associated with using each regimen.
Results: The analytic sample included 8,790 clients: 84% used mifepristone and misoprostol, and 16% used misoprostol-only. Most clients (54%) were aged 26-35. Characteristics of having fewer years of education, living in the Mid-Atlantic or Midwest, and reporting a lower income were positively associated with using misoprostol-only. Characteristics of identifying as white or a race other than Black or white, as well as having higher levels of education and reporting a higher income, were positively associated with using mifepristone/misoprostol. Although not directly tested, associated characteristics indicate that a difference in regimen price may have influenced regimen use.
Conclusions: Findings demonstrate the range of people who have telehealth medication abortions and suggest some differences between clients who used mifepristone/misoprostol and clients who used misoprostol-only.
Implications: As mifepristone continues to be restricted and telehealth abortions are a growing share of the medication abortions provided in the US, these findings inform service delivery for clinics considering expanding into telehealth to provide misoprostol-only regimens. Findings also inform expanding policies aimed at the affordability of services, including expanding coverage from private, public, and Medicaid insurance programs.