“Treating me like a criminal”: A qualitative study of birthing parents' perspectives on racism and biases in newborn drug testing for substance exposure during pregnancy

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jamie L. Huizinga , Lauren Oshman , Regina Onishchenko , Madgean Joassaint , Emily Madlambayan , Murphy Van Sparrentak , Katharine McCabe , Courtney Townsel , Christopher J. Frank , P. Paul Chandanabhumma , Justine P. Wu
{"title":"“Treating me like a criminal”: A qualitative study of birthing parents' perspectives on racism and biases in newborn drug testing for substance exposure during pregnancy","authors":"Jamie L. Huizinga ,&nbsp;Lauren Oshman ,&nbsp;Regina Onishchenko ,&nbsp;Madgean Joassaint ,&nbsp;Emily Madlambayan ,&nbsp;Murphy Van Sparrentak ,&nbsp;Katharine McCabe ,&nbsp;Courtney Townsel ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Frank ,&nbsp;P. Paul Chandanabhumma ,&nbsp;Justine P. Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Black birthing people are more likely to have their newborns undergo testing for drug exposure with subsequent reporting to Child Protective Services (CPS) and termination of parental rights compared to White birthing people. The study aim was to describe the experiences of people who gave birth regarding newborn drug testing (NDT) and explore the impact of racism and other biases. A secondary aim was to elicit participant recommendations for policy changes to address racial inequities in NDT and CPS reporting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative study is the third and last phase of an explanatory sequential mixed methods study (quantitative phase followed by qualitative phase). We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants who had given birth within the last 12 months at a single academic hospital in the midwestern United States. We purposefully sampled racial minorities and those who went through NDT to ensure their perspectives were represented. Our interview guide, data collection, and reflexive thematic interpretation were informed by the Public Health Critical Race Praxis and the Levels of Racism framework. A six member Participatory Council and two external antiracist research consultants provided guidance on study activities and data interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified four major themes: 1) being honest about substance use with healthcare providers can lead to punishment and CPS reporting; 2) historical and contemporary racism perpetuate negative stereotypes about Black patients, contributing to racial disparities in NDT; 3) the medical and legal risks of recreational cannabis use in pregnancy were not clearly explained by healthcare providers; 4) participants advocated for non-punitive, respectful, and early care for substance use during pregnancy, including a clear explanation of local NDT and CPS reporting policies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings highlight the need for policy changes to decriminalize newborn drug testing and address systematic racism and bias against Black parents throughout the process. Participants identified a need to improve early access to non-judgmental substance use counseling and treatment that includes clear and consistent guidance about NDT and in particular, the health and legal implications of cannabis use during pregnancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 209745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Black birthing people are more likely to have their newborns undergo testing for drug exposure with subsequent reporting to Child Protective Services (CPS) and termination of parental rights compared to White birthing people. The study aim was to describe the experiences of people who gave birth regarding newborn drug testing (NDT) and explore the impact of racism and other biases. A secondary aim was to elicit participant recommendations for policy changes to address racial inequities in NDT and CPS reporting.

Methods

This qualitative study is the third and last phase of an explanatory sequential mixed methods study (quantitative phase followed by qualitative phase). We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 participants who had given birth within the last 12 months at a single academic hospital in the midwestern United States. We purposefully sampled racial minorities and those who went through NDT to ensure their perspectives were represented. Our interview guide, data collection, and reflexive thematic interpretation were informed by the Public Health Critical Race Praxis and the Levels of Racism framework. A six member Participatory Council and two external antiracist research consultants provided guidance on study activities and data interpretation.

Results

We identified four major themes: 1) being honest about substance use with healthcare providers can lead to punishment and CPS reporting; 2) historical and contemporary racism perpetuate negative stereotypes about Black patients, contributing to racial disparities in NDT; 3) the medical and legal risks of recreational cannabis use in pregnancy were not clearly explained by healthcare providers; 4) participants advocated for non-punitive, respectful, and early care for substance use during pregnancy, including a clear explanation of local NDT and CPS reporting policies.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the need for policy changes to decriminalize newborn drug testing and address systematic racism and bias against Black parents throughout the process. Participants identified a need to improve early access to non-judgmental substance use counseling and treatment that includes clear and consistent guidance about NDT and in particular, the health and legal implications of cannabis use during pregnancy.
“像对待罪犯一样对待我”:一项关于怀孕期间新生儿药物检测中的种族主义和偏见的定性研究。
与白人分娩者相比,黑人分娩者更有可能让他们的新生儿接受药物暴露测试,随后向儿童保护服务(CPS)报告并终止父母权利。这项研究的目的是描述分娩的人对新生儿药物测试(NDT)的经历,并探讨种族主义和其他偏见的影响。第二个目的是征求与会者对政策变化的建议,以解决无损检测和CPS报告中的种族不平等问题。方法:本定性研究是解释性顺序混合方法研究的第三阶段,也是最后一个阶段(定量阶段之后是定性阶段)。我们对过去12个 月内在美国中西部一家学术医院分娩的15名参与者进行了半结构化访谈。我们有目的地选取了少数民族和那些经历过无损检测的人,以确保他们的观点得到代表。我们的访谈指南、数据收集和反身性专题解释都是由公共卫生关键种族实践和种族主义水平框架提供的。一个六人参与理事会和两名外部反种族主义研究顾问为研究活动和数据解释提供指导。结果:我们确定了四个主要主题:1)与医疗服务提供者诚实地使用物质可能导致惩罚和CPS报告;2)历史和当代种族主义使黑人患者的负面刻板印象永久化,导致了无损检测中的种族差异;3)医疗保健提供者没有明确解释怀孕期间使用娱乐性大麻的医疗和法律风险;4)与会者主张对怀孕期间的药物使用进行非惩罚性、尊重性和早期护理,包括对当地NDT和CPS报告政策的明确解释。结论:我们的研究结果强调需要改变政策,使新生儿药物检测合法化,并解决整个过程中系统性的种族主义和对黑人父母的偏见。与会者确定有必要改善早期获得非判断性药物使用咨询和治疗的机会,其中包括关于无损检测的明确和一致的指导,特别是关于怀孕期间使用大麻的健康和法律影响的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信