Variability across versions of the self-administered ALSFRS-R: a review and call for harmonization.

IF 2.8
Matti D Allen, Ruben P A Van Eijk, Liam Knox, Jill Carlton, Esther Hobson, Christopher J Mcdermott, Deirdre Murray, James Berry, Thomas Meyer, Angela Genge
{"title":"Variability across versions of the self-administered ALSFRS-R: a review and call for harmonization.","authors":"Matti D Allen, Ruben P A Van Eijk, Liam Knox, Jill Carlton, Esther Hobson, Christopher J Mcdermott, Deirdre Murray, James Berry, Thomas Meyer, Angela Genge","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2025.2522400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease predominantly affecting motor neurons resulting in substantial, progressive disability. The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale - revised (ALSFRS-R) is commonly used to assess and monitor functional status in patients with ALS. Additionally, it is the current regulatory accepted primary outcome measure documenting functional status in ALS clinical trials. The ALSFRS-R was originally designed to be administered to a patient by a trained professional. But over time it has been adapted to be performed independently by patients or their caregivers without assistance. Several different versions of the self-administered ALSFRS-R have been created over the past two decades, each with subtle but important differences. Some of these differences are related to language used in item wording or the platform for which the scale was intended to be administered (e.g. digitally). These differences across versions of the self-administered scale may be problematic as they could increase the heterogeneity of data collected across clinical trials or complicate interpretation of results across trials. Therefore, we highlight the need for a harmonized version of the self-administered ALSFRS-R to be used across all clinics and clinical trial sites internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"631-636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2522400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease predominantly affecting motor neurons resulting in substantial, progressive disability. The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale - revised (ALSFRS-R) is commonly used to assess and monitor functional status in patients with ALS. Additionally, it is the current regulatory accepted primary outcome measure documenting functional status in ALS clinical trials. The ALSFRS-R was originally designed to be administered to a patient by a trained professional. But over time it has been adapted to be performed independently by patients or their caregivers without assistance. Several different versions of the self-administered ALSFRS-R have been created over the past two decades, each with subtle but important differences. Some of these differences are related to language used in item wording or the platform for which the scale was intended to be administered (e.g. digitally). These differences across versions of the self-administered scale may be problematic as they could increase the heterogeneity of data collected across clinical trials or complicate interpretation of results across trials. Therefore, we highlight the need for a harmonized version of the self-administered ALSFRS-R to be used across all clinics and clinical trial sites internationally.

自我管理ALSFRS-R各版本的可变性:审查和统一的呼吁。
肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,主要影响运动神经元,导致大量进行性残疾。肌萎缩侧索硬化症功能评定量表-修订版(ALSFRS-R)通常用于评估和监测肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的功能状态。此外,它是目前监管机构认可的记录ALS临床试验中功能状态的主要结局指标。ALSFRS-R最初是由训练有素的专业人员对患者进行管理的。但随着时间的推移,它已经适应了由病人或他们的护理人员在没有帮助的情况下独立进行。在过去的二十年里,已经出现了几个不同版本的自我管理ALSFRS-R,每个版本都有细微但重要的区别。其中一些差异与项目措辞中使用的语言或用于管理量表的平台有关(例如,数字)。不同版本自我管理量表之间的这些差异可能是有问题的,因为它们可能增加临床试验中收集的数据的异质性,或使不同试验结果的解释复杂化。因此,我们强调需要一个统一版本的自我给药ALSFRS-R,以便在国际上所有诊所和临床试验地点使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信