Utility And Real-World Clinical Outcomes Of Next-Generation Sequencing In Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer In South Indian Population.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf168
Anoop Tm, Lakshmi Raj, Pallavi Nair, Athira Vincent
{"title":"Utility And Real-World Clinical Outcomes Of Next-Generation Sequencing In Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer In South Indian Population.","authors":"Anoop Tm, Lakshmi Raj, Pallavi Nair, Athira Vincent","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an advanced sequencing technology that enables rapid sequencing of numerous DNA strands and perform simultaneous analysis of various genes and diverse genomic characteristics. While there is a lack of substantial evidence available, the extent to which NGS may improve clinical outcomes among cancer patients in a real-world scenario remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical utility of NGS in patients treated with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its impact on real-world clinical outcomes, treated with targetable or non-targetable agents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study conducted in 322 participants distributed over two broad categories- next-generation sequencing (NGS) and non-NGS. The NGS category consisted of patients who underwent genetic mutation screening by the NGS method. This group was further categorized into two sub groups- NGS - targetable and NGS- non targetable. The non- NGS category consisted of patients who did not undergo mutation testing by the NGS method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in overall survival between NGS and non-NGS groups (p=0.0038). There was a significant difference between NGS targetable and non- targetable groups in terms of PFS (p= 0.0016) and overall survival (OS) (p<0.0001). There was a significant difference between NGS- matched and non-matched groups in terms of PFS (p<0.00011) as well as OS (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NGS significantly improved survival in advanced NSCLC. Patients who received treatments matched to their NGS results experienced significantly longer survival compared to those with non-matched treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an advanced sequencing technology that enables rapid sequencing of numerous DNA strands and perform simultaneous analysis of various genes and diverse genomic characteristics. While there is a lack of substantial evidence available, the extent to which NGS may improve clinical outcomes among cancer patients in a real-world scenario remain uncertain.

Objective: To investigate the clinical utility of NGS in patients treated with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its impact on real-world clinical outcomes, treated with targetable or non-targetable agents.

Materials and methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in 322 participants distributed over two broad categories- next-generation sequencing (NGS) and non-NGS. The NGS category consisted of patients who underwent genetic mutation screening by the NGS method. This group was further categorized into two sub groups- NGS - targetable and NGS- non targetable. The non- NGS category consisted of patients who did not undergo mutation testing by the NGS method.

Results: There was a significant difference in overall survival between NGS and non-NGS groups (p=0.0038). There was a significant difference between NGS targetable and non- targetable groups in terms of PFS (p= 0.0016) and overall survival (OS) (p<0.0001). There was a significant difference between NGS- matched and non-matched groups in terms of PFS (p<0.00011) as well as OS (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: NGS significantly improved survival in advanced NSCLC. Patients who received treatments matched to their NGS results experienced significantly longer survival compared to those with non-matched treatments.

新一代测序在南印度晚期非小细胞肺癌中的应用和实际临床结果
背景:下一代测序(NGS)是一种先进的测序技术,可以快速测序大量DNA链,并同时分析各种基因和多种基因组特征。虽然缺乏充分的证据,但NGS在多大程度上可以改善现实世界中癌症患者的临床结果仍不确定。目的:探讨NGS在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者治疗中的临床应用及其对现实世界临床结果的影响,包括可靶向或非靶向药物治疗。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,共有322名参与者,分为两大类-下一代测序(NGS)和非NGS。NGS类别包括通过NGS方法进行基因突变筛查的患者。这一组进一步分为两个亚组- NGS-目标和NGS-非目标。非NGS类别包括未通过NGS方法进行突变检测的患者。结果:NGS组与非NGS组总生存率差异有统计学意义(p=0.0038)。NGS可靶向组与非靶向组在PFS (p= 0.0016)和总生存期(OS)方面差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与未接受匹配治疗的患者相比,接受与NGS结果相匹配的治疗的患者的生存期明显更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信