An Intersectional Examination of Anxiety and Depression in Sexual and Gender Minorities.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Teresa A Graziano, Natalie J Shook
{"title":"An Intersectional Examination of Anxiety and Depression in Sexual and Gender Minorities.","authors":"Teresa A Graziano, Natalie J Shook","doi":"10.1002/nur.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive evidence demonstrates higher rates of anxiety and depression in sexual and gender minorities (SGM) compared to the general population. However, few studies have examined the intersection of sexual orientation and gender identity. Status as a multiple minority may further increase the risk for anxiety and depression. The goal of this study was to assess the extent to which anxiety or depression diagnosis, clinical cutoff, or symptom severity differed by gender identity, sexual orientation, or the intersection of the two. A sample of 554 US adults (75.6% White, between 18 and 65 years) were recruited through social media to complete an online survey. Of the sample, 44.2% were sexual minorities and 35.6% were gender minorities. Results from logistic regression analyses indicated that heterosexuals were 41% more likely to be diagnosed with anxiety, but sexual minorities were nearly three times more likely to be diagnosed with depression and 20 times more likely to meet PHQ-9 cutoffs. Based on analyses of covariance, gender minority participants reported significantly greater depression severity than cisgender participants. Sexual orientation and gender identity interacted in the depression, but not the anxiety symptom severity model. Cisgender sexual minorities had greater depression severity than cisgender heterosexuals, but lower depression severity than gender minorities who were also sexual minorities. These findings suggest that dual minorities experience greater minority stress, which worsens depression symptom severity. This has important clinical implications for nurses caring for SGMs. Future studies should consider intersectional analysis to elucidate further the compounding effects of dual minority status on SGMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive evidence demonstrates higher rates of anxiety and depression in sexual and gender minorities (SGM) compared to the general population. However, few studies have examined the intersection of sexual orientation and gender identity. Status as a multiple minority may further increase the risk for anxiety and depression. The goal of this study was to assess the extent to which anxiety or depression diagnosis, clinical cutoff, or symptom severity differed by gender identity, sexual orientation, or the intersection of the two. A sample of 554 US adults (75.6% White, between 18 and 65 years) were recruited through social media to complete an online survey. Of the sample, 44.2% were sexual minorities and 35.6% were gender minorities. Results from logistic regression analyses indicated that heterosexuals were 41% more likely to be diagnosed with anxiety, but sexual minorities were nearly three times more likely to be diagnosed with depression and 20 times more likely to meet PHQ-9 cutoffs. Based on analyses of covariance, gender minority participants reported significantly greater depression severity than cisgender participants. Sexual orientation and gender identity interacted in the depression, but not the anxiety symptom severity model. Cisgender sexual minorities had greater depression severity than cisgender heterosexuals, but lower depression severity than gender minorities who were also sexual minorities. These findings suggest that dual minorities experience greater minority stress, which worsens depression symptom severity. This has important clinical implications for nurses caring for SGMs. Future studies should consider intersectional analysis to elucidate further the compounding effects of dual minority status on SGMs.

性和性别少数群体焦虑和抑郁的交叉检查。
大量证据表明,与一般人群相比,性和性别少数群体(SGM)的焦虑和抑郁率更高。然而,很少有研究考察性取向和性别认同的交集。作为多民族的身份可能会进一步增加焦虑和抑郁的风险。本研究的目的是评估性别认同、性取向或两者的交集对焦虑或抑郁诊断、临床界限或症状严重程度的影响程度。通过社交媒体招募了554名美国成年人(75.6%为白人,年龄在18至65岁之间)来完成一项在线调查。在样本中,44.2%是性少数群体,35.6%是性别少数群体。逻辑回归分析的结果表明,异性恋者被诊断为焦虑症的可能性要高出41%,而性少数群体被诊断为抑郁症的可能性要高出近3倍,达到PHQ-9阈值的可能性要高出20倍。基于协方差分析,少数性别参与者报告的抑郁严重程度明显高于顺性别参与者。性取向和性别认同在抑郁中相互作用,但在焦虑症状严重程度模型中不相互作用。性少数群体的抑郁程度高于异性恋群体,但低于性少数群体。这些发现表明,双少数族裔经历了更大的少数族裔压力,这加剧了抑郁症状的严重程度。这对护理SGMs的护士具有重要的临床意义。未来的研究应考虑交叉分析,以进一步阐明双重少数民族地位对SGMs的复合效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信