International Perspectives on the Management of Acute Mallet Finger Injuries: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Max McCARTHY, Luke McCARRON, Spencer B Chambers, Brahman Sivakumar, David J Graham, Randy Bindra
{"title":"International Perspectives on the Management of Acute Mallet Finger Injuries: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Max McCARTHY, Luke McCARRON, Spencer B Chambers, Brahman Sivakumar, David J Graham, Randy Bindra","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Mallet fingers are common injuries with management often being guided by presence of fracture, joint subluxation, chronicity and patient requirements and surgeon preferences. The purpose of this study was to understand current trends of management of mallet finger injuries. <b>Methods:</b> This study surveyed an international group of English-speaking hand surgeons (<i>n</i> = 244) with different types of mallet finger injury patterns to assess current trends and identify any regional variations in practice. <b>Results:</b> Nonoperative management with extension splinting was the preferred treatment for soft tissue (93%) and congruent bony (87%) mallet finger injuries amongst surgeons from all regions. Similarly, most surgeons (76%) preferred operative treatment for incongruent bony injuries. The management of subtle joint subluxation was contentious with 36% recommending splinting and the rest opting for closed reduction and wiring or open reduction. <b>Conclusions:</b> While there is no consensus on treatment, surgeons seem to prefer nonoperative treatment for most soft tissue mallet injuries. Surgeon preference seems to dictate the management of bony mallet injuries especially with incongruent joints. Prospective randomised studies would be beneficial in providing evidence-based guidelines for management of this common injury. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level V (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mallet fingers are common injuries with management often being guided by presence of fracture, joint subluxation, chronicity and patient requirements and surgeon preferences. The purpose of this study was to understand current trends of management of mallet finger injuries. Methods: This study surveyed an international group of English-speaking hand surgeons (n = 244) with different types of mallet finger injury patterns to assess current trends and identify any regional variations in practice. Results: Nonoperative management with extension splinting was the preferred treatment for soft tissue (93%) and congruent bony (87%) mallet finger injuries amongst surgeons from all regions. Similarly, most surgeons (76%) preferred operative treatment for incongruent bony injuries. The management of subtle joint subluxation was contentious with 36% recommending splinting and the rest opting for closed reduction and wiring or open reduction. Conclusions: While there is no consensus on treatment, surgeons seem to prefer nonoperative treatment for most soft tissue mallet injuries. Surgeon preference seems to dictate the management of bony mallet injuries especially with incongruent joints. Prospective randomised studies would be beneficial in providing evidence-based guidelines for management of this common injury. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

急性槌状指损伤管理的国际观点:一项横断面调查。
背景:槌状指是一种常见的损伤,治疗通常根据骨折、关节半脱位、慢性、患者需求和外科医生的偏好来指导。本研究的目的是了解锤状指损伤治疗的当前趋势。方法:本研究调查了一组讲英语的国际手外科医生(n = 244),他们有不同类型的锤状指损伤模式,以评估当前的趋势,并确定实践中的任何区域差异。结果:在所有地区的外科医生中,伸直夹板非手术治疗是软组织(93%)和全骨(87%)锤状指损伤的首选治疗方法。同样,大多数外科医生(76%)倾向于手术治疗不一致性骨损伤。轻度关节半脱位的治疗存在争议,36%的人建议夹板固定,其余的人选择闭合复位和固定或切开复位。结论:尽管对治疗方法尚无共识,但外科医生似乎更倾向于非手术治疗大多数软组织槌状损伤。外科医生的偏好似乎决定了骨槌伤的处理,特别是关节不一致。前瞻性随机研究将有助于为这种常见损伤的治疗提供循证指南。证据等级:V级(治疗性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信