Response to the letter ‘Balancing methodological rigor and simplicity in ROBUST-RCT: is optional assessment of bias domains the ideal path forward’

IF 5.2 2区医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111892

Ying Wang, Gordon Guyatt

引用次数: 0

查看原文本刊更多论文

对“平衡方法的严谨性和简洁性：对偏倚域的可选评估是理想的前进道路吗”这封信的回应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

12.00

自引率

6.90%

发文量

320

审稿时长

44 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.