Blending De-implementation and Implementation to Promote Adoption of Universal PrEP Guidelines: Determinants, Strategies, and Outcomes.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Critical Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1080/09581596.2025.2498714
Jahn Jaramillo, Tyler S Bartholomew, Audrey Harkness
{"title":"Blending De-implementation and Implementation to Promote Adoption of Universal PrEP Guidelines: Determinants, Strategies, and Outcomes.","authors":"Jahn Jaramillo, Tyler S Bartholomew, Audrey Harkness","doi":"10.1080/09581596.2025.2498714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) proposed updated clinical practice guidelines for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), marking a significant shift from risk-based screening to discussing PrEP with all sexually active adults. To ensure widespread adoption of new guidelines, this commentary posits that intentional de-implementation of the previous CDC guidelines is necessary to facilitate the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of new guidelines. Based on a review of the literature, the authors leveraged implementation science frameworks (i.e., CFIR, ERIC taxonomy, and RE-AIM) to map theoretical determinants, corresponding strategies, and outcomes in the context of de-implementing previous CDC guidelines for PrEP and simultaneously implementing the new guidelines. Potential barriers identified included resource constraints, staff capability, and structural characteristics of organizations that may impede de-implementation efforts. Potential facilitators included provider motivation and incentive systems that encourage providers to discuss PrEP with sexually active clients. Strategies like normalizing PrEP education and services, workflow redesign, and task-shifting could tackle workforce challenges. These strategies could aid in phasing out old guidelines, implementing new guidelines, increasing PrEP referrals, and reducing HIV incidence. Phasing out previous PrEP guidelines demands intentional (de-)implementation to enhance universal HIV prevention efforts and advance national plans for Ending the HIV Epidemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":51469,"journal":{"name":"Critical Public Health","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2498714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) proposed updated clinical practice guidelines for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), marking a significant shift from risk-based screening to discussing PrEP with all sexually active adults. To ensure widespread adoption of new guidelines, this commentary posits that intentional de-implementation of the previous CDC guidelines is necessary to facilitate the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of new guidelines. Based on a review of the literature, the authors leveraged implementation science frameworks (i.e., CFIR, ERIC taxonomy, and RE-AIM) to map theoretical determinants, corresponding strategies, and outcomes in the context of de-implementing previous CDC guidelines for PrEP and simultaneously implementing the new guidelines. Potential barriers identified included resource constraints, staff capability, and structural characteristics of organizations that may impede de-implementation efforts. Potential facilitators included provider motivation and incentive systems that encourage providers to discuss PrEP with sexually active clients. Strategies like normalizing PrEP education and services, workflow redesign, and task-shifting could tackle workforce challenges. These strategies could aid in phasing out old guidelines, implementing new guidelines, increasing PrEP referrals, and reducing HIV incidence. Phasing out previous PrEP guidelines demands intentional (de-)implementation to enhance universal HIV prevention efforts and advance national plans for Ending the HIV Epidemic.

将非实施和实施相结合,促进采用普遍的预防工作指南:决定因素、战略和结果。
2021年,美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)提出了最新的暴露前预防(PrEP)临床实践指南,标志着从基于风险的筛查到与所有性活跃的成年人讨论PrEP的重大转变。为了确保新指南的广泛采用,本评注认为有必要有意取消以前的疾病预防控制中心指南,以促进新指南的采用、实施和维持。在文献综述的基础上,作者利用实施科学框架(即CFIR, ERIC分类法和RE-AIM)来绘制理论决定因素,相应的策略,以及在取消实施先前CDC PrEP指南和同时实施新指南的背景下的结果。确定的潜在障碍包括可能阻碍非执行工作的资源限制、工作人员能力和组织的结构特征。潜在的促进因素包括鼓励提供者与性活跃客户讨论预防措施的提供者动机和激励制度。诸如使PrEP教育和服务正常化、工作流程重新设计和任务转移等策略可以解决劳动力挑战。这些战略有助于逐步淘汰旧指南,实施新指南,增加PrEP转诊,并降低艾滋病毒发病率。逐步取消以前的预防艾滋病指导方针要求有意地(取消)执行,以加强普遍预防艾滋病毒的努力,并推进终止艾滋病毒流行的国家计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Critical Public Health (CPH) is a respected peer-review journal for researchers and practitioners working in public health, health promotion and related fields. It brings together international scholarship to provide critical analyses of theory and practice, reviews of literature and explorations of new ways of working. The journal publishes high quality work that is open and critical in perspective and which reports on current research and debates in the field. CPH encourages an interdisciplinary focus and features innovative analyses. It is committed to exploring and debating issues of equity and social justice; in particular, issues of sexism, racism and other forms of oppression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信