The Role of Social Determinants of Health in the Receipt of Systemic Treatment for Metastatic Melanoma.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Hanna Kakish, Maira A Bhatty, Adam Wade, Hailey Seibert, Henry Herrera, Iris Sheng, Ankit Mangla, Richard S Hoehn, Luke D Rothermel
{"title":"The Role of Social Determinants of Health in the Receipt of Systemic Treatment for Metastatic Melanoma.","authors":"Hanna Kakish, Maira A Bhatty, Adam Wade, Hailey Seibert, Henry Herrera, Iris Sheng, Ankit Mangla, Richard S Hoehn, Luke D Rothermel","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Simple summary: </strong>The development of contemporary immune and targeted therapies for patients with metastatic extended survival compared to the previous standard of care treatments. Therefore, equitable access to these therapies for all patients with advanced melanoma is of high importance. We aimed to understand the association between SES with treatment receipt and prognosis. Furthermore, we aimed to identify detailed reasons why patients with stage IV melanoma do not undergo systemic treatment. Our findings would help us understand what interventions are most helpful to improve the care of patients with advanced melanoma within our regional hospital system.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) has not been used to study the effects of socioeconomic status (SES) in the receipt of treatment in melanoma. We set out to understand the effect of SES on the receipt of systemic treatment upon diagnosis of stage IV melanoma patients within our health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried patients with stage IV melanoma at our institution between 2010 and 2021. We defined SES based on ADI (highest quartile considered \"low SES\"). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of systemic therapy receipt. Additionally, we reviewed granular reasons for not receiving systemic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred seventy-nine patients were included, of whom 119 (66.5%) received any type of systemic treatment. Patients were less likely to receive systemic therapy if they had worse performance status, low SES, or were diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. The majority of barriers to receiving systemic therapy included poor baseline medical condition and advanced disease with recommendation for hospice care (39 patients, 65%). Potentially modifiable reasons included refusal by the patient (5 patients, 8.3%), which did not differ between high and low SES patients, and occurred in only 1 patient ≥2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low SES predicted lower systemic treatment receipt for stage IV melanoma at our institution; however, most limitations to treatment came from nonmodifiable barriers to care at the time of diagnosis. These findings provide valuable insight into equity-focused programming at our institution and others.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simple summary: The development of contemporary immune and targeted therapies for patients with metastatic extended survival compared to the previous standard of care treatments. Therefore, equitable access to these therapies for all patients with advanced melanoma is of high importance. We aimed to understand the association between SES with treatment receipt and prognosis. Furthermore, we aimed to identify detailed reasons why patients with stage IV melanoma do not undergo systemic treatment. Our findings would help us understand what interventions are most helpful to improve the care of patients with advanced melanoma within our regional hospital system.

Objectives: The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) has not been used to study the effects of socioeconomic status (SES) in the receipt of treatment in melanoma. We set out to understand the effect of SES on the receipt of systemic treatment upon diagnosis of stage IV melanoma patients within our health system.

Methods: We queried patients with stage IV melanoma at our institution between 2010 and 2021. We defined SES based on ADI (highest quartile considered "low SES"). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of systemic therapy receipt. Additionally, we reviewed granular reasons for not receiving systemic treatment.

Results: One hundred seventy-nine patients were included, of whom 119 (66.5%) received any type of systemic treatment. Patients were less likely to receive systemic therapy if they had worse performance status, low SES, or were diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. The majority of barriers to receiving systemic therapy included poor baseline medical condition and advanced disease with recommendation for hospice care (39 patients, 65%). Potentially modifiable reasons included refusal by the patient (5 patients, 8.3%), which did not differ between high and low SES patients, and occurred in only 1 patient ≥2018.

Conclusions: Low SES predicted lower systemic treatment receipt for stage IV melanoma at our institution; however, most limitations to treatment came from nonmodifiable barriers to care at the time of diagnosis. These findings provide valuable insight into equity-focused programming at our institution and others.

健康的社会决定因素在接受转移性黑色素瘤全身治疗中的作用
简单总结:与以前的标准护理治疗相比,当代免疫和靶向治疗的发展延长了转移性患者的生存期。因此,为所有晚期黑色素瘤患者公平获得这些治疗是非常重要的。我们的目的是了解SES与治疗接受和预后之间的关系。此外,我们旨在确定IV期黑色素瘤患者不接受全身治疗的详细原因。我们的研究结果将帮助我们了解哪些干预措施对改善我们地区医院系统中晚期黑色素瘤患者的护理最有帮助。目的:区域剥夺指数(ADI)尚未用于研究社会经济地位(SES)在接受黑色素瘤治疗中的影响。我们开始了解在我们的卫生系统中,SES对IV期黑色素瘤患者诊断后接受全身治疗的影响。方法:我们查询了2010年至2021年间在我们机构患有IV期黑色素瘤的患者。我们根据ADI(最高四分位数被认为是“低SES”)定义SES。进行多变量回归分析以确定全身治疗接受的预测因素。此外,我们回顾了不接受系统治疗的具体原因。结果:纳入179例患者,其中119例(66.5%)接受了任何类型的全身治疗。如果患者的表现状况较差,SES较低或在2010年至2017年期间被诊断出来,则不太可能接受全身治疗。接受全身治疗的主要障碍包括基线医疗状况差和晚期疾病,建议接受临终关怀(39例,65%)。可能改变的原因包括患者拒绝(5例,8.3%),高SES和低SES患者之间没有差异,只有1例患者≥2018。结论:低社会经济地位预示着本院IV期黑色素瘤较低的全身治疗收获率;然而,治疗的大多数限制来自于诊断时护理的不可改变的障碍。这些发现为我们机构和其他机构关注股权的规划提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信